Quick Links to Articles:

Matt's Take On The News

subscribetweetfacebookdiggLinkedIn

Fannie Mae Gets Tough With Walk-Away Mortgage Defaulters

Alex Finkelstein from the Real Estate Channel brings us an article that may impact quite a few people.  The subject of  “strategic defaults” or “Walk Aways” has been the topic of conversation at cocktail parties or around water coolers for sometime.  Simply put, a strategic default involves an individual who has no hardship and can afford to make payments but chooses not to.

According to Mr. Finkelstein:

“Under the new rules:

  • The five-year waiting period is eliminated.
  • Borrowers who can't document "extenuating circumstances" or show that they made an effort with their lender to avoid foreclosure will have to wait seven years to get a new loan.
  • Those who can demonstrate hardship or attempted a workout with their lender may have to wait only three years.
  • Fannie plans to step up legal actions to seek deficiency judgments in states that allow lenders to go after borrowers' other assets. In addition,
  • Fannie will instruct its lender partners to monitor delinquent loans owned by Fannie, and recommend cases that warrant attention.”


In my opinion the biggest detriment for strategic defaults revolves around going after deficiency judgments.  I’m not sure that tacking on a few extra years to the “waiting period” required to secure a new loan will make much of a difference.



Fannie Mae Gets Tough With Walk-Away Mortgage Defaulters

Posted by Alex Finkelstein 07/05/10 8:01 AM EST

The good times are gone for residential mortgage defaulters in the U.S.

Fannie Mae has just changed the rules of the game for people who walk from their home loans, better known as strategic loan defaults.

The government-owned agency that backs up loans from lenders says it will lock out borrowers from getting a new loan for seven years if they default on a mortgage they could afford to pay, the Wall Street Journal reports.

Under the new rules:

  • The five-year waiting period is eliminated.
  • Borrowers who can't document "extenuating circumstances" or show that they made an effort with their lender to avoid foreclosure will have to wait seven years to get a new loan.
  • Those who can demonstrate hardship or attempted a workout with their lender may have to wait only three years.
  • Fannie plans to step up legal actions to seek deficiency judgments in states that allow lenders to go after borrowers' other assets. In addition,
  • Fannie will instruct its lender partners to monitor delinquent loans owned by Fannie, and recommend cases that warrant attention.


Fannie Mae is taking the new steps after finding:

  • The majority of the defaulters are in Florida, Nevada and Arizona Nearly one in four homeowners with a mortgage is under water, or owes more than their home is worth, according to CoreLogic,
  • A Morgan Stanley report estimates that around 12% of all mortgage defaults in February were 'strategic', meaning homeowners were financially able to pay on the loan but chose not to do so.
  • In 2008, Fannie revised to five years from four the period that borrowers with a foreclosure must wait before they are eligible for a new loan.

The WSJ reports that even as Fannie Mae steps up penalties, the agency is preparing to reduce waiting periods for borrowers facing hardship who surrender their homes and avoid foreclosure.

Under previously announced rules that take effect next month, Fannie will reduce waiting periods to two years for borrowers who agree to transfer their homes to the company through a "deed in lieu of foreclosure," or who complete short sales, where homes are sold for less than the amount owed.

The move to lock out borrowers from getting a new loan for seven years represents the latest effort by the mortgage industry to prevent a new wave of losses that could result if more borrowers who can afford their monthly payments instead opt to "strategically" default on loans, because they owe far more than their homes are worth.

Terence Edwards

"Walking away from a mortgage is bad for borrowers and bad for communities, and our approach is meant to deter the disturbing trend toward strategic defaulting," Terence Edwards, Fannie's executive vice president for credit portfolio management, said in a prepared statement.

Fannie's move comes amid greater concern that it has become socially acceptable for borrowers to stop paying their loans, and that such a shift could exacerbate the housing bust. Those worries are particularly acute in Arizona, Nevada, Florida and other hard-hit housing markets where it could take years for borrowers to return to positive equity.

Fannie Mae's smaller sibling, Freddie Mac, also requires borrowers with a foreclosure to wait at least five years. Foreclosures can stay on a credit report for up to seven years.



Fed owns nearly half of all foreclosed homes

Ryan McMaken from the Christian Science Monitor reports on a growing problem within our government.  The government owns close to 50% of all homes that have been foreclosed upon.  Mr. McMaken astutely points out that bullish calls on the state of the housing market (i.e. prices) have caused lenders, servicers, investors etc. to stand pat when evaluating offers (pre foreclosure) in the hope that housing prices would miraculous bounce back.  This is not happening anytime soon.

This is best exemplified by the following passages from the article, “The latest data for the S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Index were released. The home price index for April is still down considerably from the July 2006 peak:

As of April 2010, average home prices across the United States are at similar levels to where they were in late summer/early autumn of 2003. From their peak in June/July of 2006 through the trough in April 2009, the 10-City Composite is down 33.5% and the 20-City Composite is down 32.6%. The peak-to-date figures through April 2010 are -30.5% and -30.0%, respectively.

To paraphrase Donald Rumsfeld from a different context, it is close to impossible now to deny that the housing markets are in for a long, hard slog. Well, the places that have hit bottom are in for a slog. Some places, such as Las Vegas, are still on their way down. Comparing year over year, Las Vegas home prices actually fell 8.5 percent. April of 2009 was a disastrous month for home prices, but Vegas is now below even that.”

Fed owns nearly half of all foreclosed homes
The protracted growth of non-performing loans will likely continue to have a deflationary effect as lender portfolios contract with the value of residential real estate.


By Ryan McMaken, Guest blogger / July 1, 2010

The latest data for the S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Index were released. The home price index for April is still down considerably from the July 2006 peak:

As of April 2010, average home prices across the United States are at similar levels to where they were in late summer/early autumn of 2003. From their peak in June/July of 2006 through the trough in April 2009, the 10-City Composite is down 33.5% and the 20-City Composite is down 32.6%. The peak-to-date figures through April 2010 are -30.5% and -30.0%, respectively.

To paraphrase Donald Rumsfeld from a different context, it is close to impossible now to deny that the housing markets are in for a long, hard slog. Well, the places that have hit bottom are in for a slog. Some places, such as Las Vegas, are still on their way down. Comparing year over year, Las Vegas home prices actually fell 8.5 percent. April of 2009 was a disastrous month for home prices, but Vegas is now below even that.

This all assumes an owner’s perspective, of course. It’s a nice buyers’ market out there right now for some people.

This is April data, so it doesn’t compare directly to the May data I commented on here a few days ago, but the data continues to drive home the fact that home prices simply aren’t going to bounce back. Thanks to bad public policy and perennial but unwarranted bullishness about real estate, lenders assumed that prices were going to bounce back. Consequently, mortgage servicers and investors have been dragging their feet on approving short sales and the liquidation of foreclosed properties.

Nevertheless, the holders of REO properties (foreclosed properties returned to the bank) are going to have to do something with them sooner or later. And worse yet, almost half of those REOs are held by the government:

Based on Radar Logic’s analysis, the federal government’s REO inventory — including homes owned by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, HUD, and the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) — has increased steadily for over 24 months and now accounts for approximately 46 percent of the nation’s total REO supply.

Looking at information from the GSEs and HUD, Radar Logic says the government currently owns 209,500 homes as a result of foreclosure, and the company estimates there could be an additional 9,560 homes held by the VA, for a total of 219,060 government-owned foreclosed homes.

This will create additional downward pressure on prices for the foreseeable future.

In a larger context, the protracted growth of non-performing loans will likely continue to have a deflationary effect as lender portfolios contract with the value of residential real estate.

Mansion Foreclosures Surge

Robert Frank from the Associated Press reports on a trend that just keep on increasing.  He reports that, “The percentage of $1 million-plus loans more than 90 days delinquent rose to 13.3% in February.”  Mortgages that are delinquent and are greater than $5M also continue to rise.

Mr. Frank reports that, “Lenders to the wealthy are taking a hit. Bank of America’s U.S. Trust unit reported a nearly six fold increase in its loan-loss provision in the first quarter, to $184 million from $31 million a year earlier. “  The point here for those realtors and real estate buyers that are involved in short sales is that the higher end foreclosures are crushing banks bottom lines.  As a result they are more apt to take discounts on these mortgages in order to keep them off of their books.

JUNE 29, 2010, 11:14 AM ET
Mansion Foreclosures Surge

For those who think all is well again in the world of Richistan, consider the following statistic.

The percentage of $1 million-plus loans more than 90 days delinquent rose to 13.3% in February, half again as high as the 8.6% overall delinquency rate, according to First American CoreLogic, which tracks U.S. real estate and mortgages.

The statistic, from this Reuters article, points to a sobering reality amid the happy talk of newly minted millionaires. Many affluent and wealthy can’t keep up with their mortgage payments.

Last month, there were 205 foreclosure filings for mortgages of $5 million or more, the third straight month such filings rose, according to RealtyTrac. The 205 foreclosures totaled $813 million.

“Early on in the crash, the weakness was in the lower-price tiers. In the past year, most of the biggest price declines have been in the upper tiers,” Mark Zandi, chief economist of Moody’s Analytics, told Reuters. “That suggests high-end households are coming under increasing pressure.”

Lenders to the wealthy are taking a hit. Bank of America’s U.S. Trust unit reported a nearly sixfold increase in its loan-loss provision in the first quarter, to $184 million from $31 million a year earlier. Net charge-offs at Northern Trust rose to $31 million from $2.7 million a year earlier, though they were down from the 2009 fourth quarter, according to Reuters.

While some say the weakness at the top is part of every economic cycle, real-estate experts say the mansion market has rarely if ever been hit so hard. “This recession is unlike prior recessions. It hit the high end just as much as the low end,” said Sam Khater, senior economist at CoreLogic.

Of course, the foreclosures could be the result of over-leveraged speculators and developers as opposed to once-wealthy families. Or it could be the result of a poor stock market in 2010, along with higher taxes.

Why do you think the mansion market is getting hit so hard even as the finances of the wealthy are reported to be improving?

Less Than One Percent Of Modified Mortgages In Obama Foreclosure Plan Involve Principal Cuts

Shahien Nasiripour from the Huffington Post reports on an alarming fact that involves principal reductions.  I speak with homeowners ,weekly, who hold out hope that the lenders are going to forgive a portion of the principal that they owe on their home.  While this is certainly possible, it is very unlikely.

Mr. Nasiripour reports that  0.1% (not 1% but one tenth of one percent!) of loan modifications resulted in principal reductions!  Only 121,000 mortgages have been modified under the Obama Administrations Home Affordable Modification Program through March 2010.  Of these only 120 (one hundred and twenty!) resulted in principal reductions.  Those that are of the half is half full crowd might say, “Yeah but it’s still possible!”  While that is certainly true. It is very unlikely.

The article reports that, “More than 11.2 million homeowners with a mortgage, or 24 percent, owe more on their mortgage than the home is worth, according to real estate research firm CoreLogic. The firm estimates that the typical "underwater" homeowner won't return to positive equity until late 2015 to early 2016.

"In some depressed markets, the typical borrower in negative equity may not experience
positive equity until 2020 or later," the firm cautions.

A January report by the State Foreclosure Prevention Working Group noted that principal reduction is the best way to stem the foreclosure crisis.

"Given the correlation between negative equity and likelihood of default, the failure to write down principal in connection with loan modifications is a glaring flaw in current efforts," the state regulators noted in their report. With so many homeowners underwater, "doing 'business as usual' only adds to the likelihood of ultimate default."

The article quotes, Rep. Darrell Issa, the top Republican on the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform as saying,  "The inescapable reality is that the economic problems facing our country [are] exacerbating the foreclosure problem, and until we have economic policies that enable and foster private sector job creation, efforts like HAMP will continue to fail and ultimately hurt those who need help the most,"  Unemployment is still a major problem and lynchpin in this recovery.

Less Than One Percent Of Modified Mortgages In Obama Foreclosure Plan Involve Principal Cuts



As few as 0.1 percent of mortgage modifications initiated under the Obama administration's signature foreclosure prevention program involve reductions of principal, according to a federal report released Wednesday.

Research by state regulators, academics, and by the Federal Reserve shows that principal reductions lead to more sustainable loan modifications. In other words, they're the best way to ensure that troubled borrowers don't lose their homes.

But of the nearly 121,000 troubled loans that have been modified by large banks and thrifts under the administration's Home Affordable Modification Program through March, just 120 of them involved a cut in principal, according to the report by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and Office of Thrift Supervision.

The Treasury Department has consistently said that the share of modified mortgages that incorporate a permanent reduction in principal is "under 10 percent." Phyllis Caldwell, chief of Treasury's Homeownership Preservation Office, reiterated that figure Wednesday on a conference call with reporters, acknowledging that the figure fluctuates as more trial modifications convert to five-year plans.

The low number reported by the federal bank regulators -- less than 0.1 percent -- calls into question the administration's entire approach to modifying the mortgages of distressed borrowers suffering from negative equity, a stagnating economy, and near-10 percent unemployment.

On Tuesday, members of the Congressional Oversight Panel sharply criticized the administration's approach during a hearing with Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner. Damon Silvers, a member of the bailout watchdog, told Geithner that the administration's $75 billion Making Home Affordable program doesn't sufficiently address the problem posed by unemployed homeowners.

Nearly 15 million workers are unemployed. More than 45 percent of them have been unemployed for at least six months.

"The inescapable reality is that the economic problems facing our country [are] exacerbating the foreclosure problem, and until we have economic policies that enable and foster private sector job creation, efforts like HAMP will continue to fail and ultimately hurt those who need help the most," Rep. Darrell Issa, the top Republican on the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, said Monday.

The administration announced Wednesday that five states can begin to use $1.5 billion in federal bailout money for their own local programs to help struggling homeowners avert foreclosure.

Caldwell told reporters that the state agencies estimate that as many as 90,000 homeowners could be helped.

About three million homes will receive foreclosure notices this year, estimates real estate research firm RealtyTrac. More than one million of them will be repossessed by lenders.

Through March, the largest banks reported nearly 1.2 million foreclosures in process, federal bank regulators said. In the first three months of the year those servicers, which represent more than 64 percent of all outstanding first-lien home mortgages, initiated nearly 371,000 new foreclosures, a jump of 19 percent from the previous quarter. They completed nearly 153,000 during the same period, the OCC/OTS report shows, also a 19 percent increase.

HAMP is part of the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP). It's scheduled to end in October.

"We only have three months left with hundreds of thousands of families facing foreclosure," Congressional Oversight Panel Chairman Elizabeth Warren told Geithner on Tuesday. "Is it time to rethink whether or not a mortgage foreclosure prevention program that is based on a group of servicers whom you describe as having done a 'terrible job' is a program that perhaps should be redesigned?"

More than 11.2 million homeowners with a mortgage, or 24 percent, owe more on their mortgage than the home is worth, according to real estate research firm CoreLogic. The firm estimates that the typical "underwater" homeowner won't return to positive equity until late 2015 to early 2016.

"In some depressed markets, the typical borrower in negative equity may not experience
positive equity until 2020 or later," the firm cautions.

A January report by the State Foreclosure Prevention Working Group noted that principal reduction is the best way to stem the foreclosure crisis.

"Given the correlation between negative equity and likelihood of default, the failure to write down principal in connection with loan modifications is a glaring flaw in current efforts," the state regulators noted in their report. With so many homeowners underwater, "doing 'business as usual' only adds to the likelihood of ultimate default."

In a bright spot, though, Wednesday's report by the federal bank regulators showed that homeowners who modified their mortgage under the administration's plan stayed current on their new mortgage at a higher rate than others. Three months after their loans were modified, nearly 17 percent of HAMP homeowners were at least 30 days delinquent on their new mortgage versus 25 percent of all modified home loans. Less than eight percent of HAMP homeowners were at least 60 days late compared to 11 percent of all homeowners with modified mortgages, data through March shows.

"These lower early post-modification delinquency rates may reflect HAMP's emphasis on the affordability of monthly payments and the requirements to verify income and complete a successful trial period," the report noted.

About four-fifths of homeowners with modified loans under HAMP saw their monthly payments decrease by at least 20 percent, data from the OCC/OTS report shows. Treasury data through May shows that homeowners in HAMP saw their median monthly payment drop by about 41 percent, meaning that half the homeowners saw a bigger drop than 41 percent while half experienced a smaller decrease.

Treasury officials stressed that the Wednesday report by federal bank regulators relied on a different set of data, so the 0.1 percent figure may be misleading. That report, which looked at data through March, reported 120,659 five-year HAMP modifications. Through March, Treasury reported 227,922 active five-year modifications.

The OCC/OTS report uses data from the largest banks and thrifts. Those firms represent roughly 70 percent of the mortgages eligible for HAMP, according to Treasury data.

On Monday, the Huffington Post requested from Treasury the total number of permanent modifications utilizing reductions in principal through May. At the time of publication, Treasury had yet to provide that number.

Treasury officials hope to see an increase in the number of HAMP modifications that incorporate reductions of principal. While the administration has ramped up the incentives it provides for principal reductions, it still relies on voluntary participation by servicers.

The low number of modified mortgages that include principal cuts may reflect the efficacy of Treasury's incentives.

More than 16 months after President Barack Obama announced his plan to help struggling homeowners, HAMP is stalling. Nearly 436,000 borrowers have been kicked out of the program while just 340,000 have received permanent relief through May.

Last month, about 155,000 homeowners were bounced from the program; just 30,000 entered the program with new temporary trial plans.

"Our current efforts to end this crisis, including the administration's initiative, have fallen woefully short," Rep. Maxine Waters, a California Democrat, said Tuesday. "[HAMP], a voluntary program with little enforcement from Treasury, remains challenged and has failed to put a dent in the epic numbers of foreclosures sweeping our country."

Herbert M. Allison, Jr., Treasury's assistant secretary for financial stability, reiterated Wednesday the administration's commitment to struggling homeowners.

"While we've made important progress stabilizing the housing market and keeping responsible families in their homes, the Obama administration will continue to do everything it can to help those who are struggling the most during this difficult time," Allison said in a statement.

Congressional criticism of the administration's approach is growing.

"Voluntary programs don't work," Waters said Tuesday. "I'm going to speak honestly: HAMP was written by the Treasury and the servicers. They're not doing anything in that program that they don't want to do. And that's why the program isn't working."

Lenders collecting foreclosure deficiencies

Dina ElBoghdady from the Washington Post writes about a subject that I speak to realtors and sellers about on a daily basis.  The subject is deficiency judgments!  Uneducated homeowners and realtors oftentimes assume that if a bank forecloses on a property, then the homeowners financial obligations are behind them.  While this may be true in specific states and for particular types of mortgages, it’s not true everywhere.

Dina offers the following passage which emulates the plight of many people, “After the bank foreclosed on Fernando Palacios’s home in March, he thought he was done with what he described as the most stressful financial situation of his life.

The bank sold the home for far less than Palacios owed on it, as often happens with foreclosures. What Palacios did not see coming was the letter from his lender demanding that he pay the shortfall: $148,064.02. ‘I really thought I was through with this house,’said Palacios, who fell behind on payments when the economy soured and his cleaning business stumbled.”  Lenders are coming after judgments if they are unable to recoup what they are owed when the property goes to auction (in fact, lenders (in most cases) can recoup their losses from a short sale as well).

Another trend is that lenders are selling their rights to collect to credit collection companies.  Ms ElBoghdady writes about the Somers family who completed a short sale last year, ‘Last year, their first lender and their home-equity line lender granted permission for the short sale. But the second lender reserved the right to come after the couple. Six months later, a collection agency called demanding $85,000 for related losses.’”

So people think that they are taking the easy way out when agreeing to a short sale, yet they leave the door open for a deficiency judgment.  My prediction has always been that if and when this mess settles out, the lenders that will sell their rights to collect on deficiencies in bulk to collection agencies.

The best advice comes from an attorney quoted in the article.  The passage reads, “Borrowers should get a waiver in writing from their lenders to protect themselves, said Diane Cipollone, an attorney at the nonprofit Civil Justice. “Nobody should assume the deficiency is forgiven,” she said.”



Lenders collecting foreclosure deficiencies
By Dina ElBoghdady
WASHINGTON POST

After the bank foreclosed on Fernando Palacios’s home in March, he thought he was done with what he described as the most stressful financial situation of his life.

The bank sold the home for far less than Palacios owed on it, as often happens with foreclosures. What Palacios did not see coming was the letter from his lender demanding that he pay the shortfall: $148,064.02. “I really thought I was through with this house,” said Palacios, who fell behind on payments when the economy soured and his cleaning business stumbled.

Over the past year, lenders have become much more aggressive in trying to recoup money lost in foreclosures and other distressed sales.

In many localities, lenders have the right to pursue borrowers whose homes have sold at a loss to collect the difference between what the property sold for and what the borrower owed on it, also called a deficiency.

Before the housing bust, when the volume of foreclosures was relatively low, lenders seldom bothered to chase after deficiencies because borrowers had few remaining assets to claim and doing so involved hassles and costs. But with foreclosures soaring, lenders are more determined to get their money back, especially if they suspect borrowers are skipping out on a loan they could afford, an increasingly common practice in areas where home values have tanked.

Palacios said he was committed to staying in his Gainesville, Va., house, which he bought in 2005. He sunk $20,000 into improving it and hoped to raise his children there. But his lender refused to modify his loan, he said. To avoid personal liability for the deficiency, Palacios is filing for bankruptcy protection, as many people do who are in similar situations, said Nancy Ryan, his bankruptcy attorney.

“I am definitely seeing more people come through my door who walked away from houses a year or two ago and thought they were as free as the dead,” Ryan said. “They’re stunned when they realize they’re not.”

Several lenders contacted for this story declined to say how often they pursue deficiencies. But many said they try to collect the debt if they conclude the borrower can repay all or part of it.

“Lenders are not going after people who face a hardship,” said John Mechem, a spokesman for the Mortgage Bankers Association. “If they can’t pay their mortgage because they have a loss of income, there is no point in going after them.”

Those who had a second mortgage, such as a home-equity line of credit, in addition to their primary mortgage may find themselves particularly vulnerable, especially if they tapped into the equity line for cash.

Second lenders are last in line to get paid when a distressed property is sold. There’s usually little or no money left over for them, making it more likely that they will pursue large deficiencies, several attorneys said.

Gretchen Somers said she and her husband understood the risks last year when they completed a “short sale,” a transaction that allowed them to sell their Manassas, Va., home for about $150,000 less than they owed on it. But they felt they had no other options.

Somers said her family hung onto the house as long as possible. They tried but failed to sell it when her husband was transferred to Arizona for his job in early 2006, just as home prices were softening. They moved back into the house then tried to sell it again in 2008, after their adjustable-rate mortgage reset and their monthly mortgage payment nearly doubled. But home prices had plunged further by then, making it even tougher to sell.

Last year, their first lender and their home-equity line lender granted permission for the short sale. But the second lender reserved the right to come after the couple. Six months later, a collection agency called demanding $85,000 for related losses.

In hindsight, Somers said she and her husband should have just walked away from the house. “We took care of the house because we wanted it to sell,” Somers said. “If they were going to come after us anyway, we shouldn’t have done them the favor of making sure it looked good and cutting the grass even after we moved out, we should have mailed them the key and said: ‘Here you go.’ ”

A handful of states do not allow lenders to pursue deficiencies, nor does a federal program that took effect April 10. Lenders participating in that initiative are paid for approving short sales and as a condition, they cannot go after outstanding debt.

In many states, lenders can go after deficiencies, though laws vary widely. Some states limit how long the banks have to file a claim or collect the debt. Others may calculate deficiencies based on the fair-market value of the house, Rao said. For instance, if a home sells for $200,000 yet its fair market value is $250,000, “the borrower who owes $240,000 on the mortgage would not have a deficiency,” he said.

Borrowers should get a waiver in writing from their lenders to protect themselves, said Diane Cipollone, an attorney at the nonprofit Civil Justice. “Nobody should assume the deficiency is forgiven,” she said.

Why a Foreclosure Defense Attorney is So Important

Gary Carlson from the Viral Socialite brings us an article that is an important one to read.  The headline says it all!  Rather than me paraphrasing a very well written article, click the link to read the entire article.  You will be glad that you did!

Why a Foreclosure Defense Attorney is So Important
Posted by VS News On June - 20 - 2010

In today’s economic climate, more and more people are finding themselves in deep financial trouble. In 2009, there were an unbelievable 3 million+ foreclosures nationwide. If you are suffering from money troubles and you’re faced with a potential impending foreclosure, then help is at hand and that help will come from a foreclosure defense lawyer. It is possible that by engaging with such an Attorney this can you stop or at the very least slow down the foreclosure proceedings you are facing.

A foreclosure defense lawyer can be one of the most important elements in a foreclosure case, they will have plenty experience in dealing with cases exactly like yours and they will have the connections available to ensure that you receive any debt relief you may be entitled to. A lawyer can give you all the information you need about the options you have available to you, and you will receive helpful and honest suggestions about what could benefit you and your family the most in this kind of situation. A foreclosure defense lawyer can help you along every step of the way because they understand what it’s like to be suffering the effects of a foreclosure, so they can help relieve you of this one stress while you focus on taking care of your family.

A lot of people each year make the mistake of choosing to represent themselves, this can present severe pitfalls, no matter how confident or knowledgeable you feel you are. The laws that surround foreclosure and mortgage law can be heavily complex and representing yourself is not something you should be considering lightly. Foreclosure and mortgage laws are often changed regularly, so much in fact that a person who is not skilled in the defense of such cases could struggle to keep up with the pace, as well as this, you’re faced with the issue that you’re battling to save your home and sometimes your emotions can get ahead of you. A foreclosure defense lawyer can keep a calm demeanor in order to battle your case effectively, not to mention they have a lot of experience and knowledge in the routes that will need to be taken throughout the case that you might not be aware of. Allowing a professional to fight on your behalf is the best chance you’ll get at winning the fight for your home.

Contrary to popular belief, a foreclosure is the last thing that a lender will want, so more often than not they will be more than willing to come to some sort of agreement or solution that will help make things easier on you. To lenders, foreclosure often means large expenses and very long procedures, so they will do what they can to avoid this from happening. Provided you contact the lender early enough in the process and you are upfront with them letting them know you feel a foreclosure may be imminent. Given this situation you could actually be more likely to get a better resolution from the lender which will help you significantly. Upon early notification of your problem, most lenders will then consider the possibility of reviewing and restructuring your loan, so that it becomes a lot more affordable for you, and this is happening even more frequently now, considering the continued pressure of the Obama Administration has put on Loan Servicers and Lenders to expedite the process and assist more homeowners.

A foreclosure does not need to be part of your future, in most cases a solution can be found, and a foreclosure defense lawyer can help you find this solution quickly and efficiently to try and bring some normality back to your life and save keep you and your family where they belong, living in your home.

By: Gary Carlsen

U.S. Housing Market Recovery Dependent on Jobs Growth, Harvard Report Says

Kathleen Howley of Bloomberg writes an interesting article that reflects on our common sense.  No matter what kind of programs our government unveils, the key is going to be sustained job growth.  Why?  Because, while the foreclosure mess is being fueled by the big bad banks and their crazy loan programs, unemployment is what will continue the foreclosure debacle.

The projected unemployment rate for 2010 is 9.6% which would be the highest rate since 1983.  The one program that seems to have helped with a slight housing recovery was the home buyers tax credit.  The credit contributed to 1 million new home sales.  This incentive has ended, so the eyes are on the bottom.  People are sitting on the sidelines, waiting to buy “when the market hits bottom.”  When will this be?  Anyone's guess.

Potential solution....buy property at distressed prices based on the actual market value.

U.S. Housing Market Recovery Dependent on Jobs Growth, Harvard Report Says
By Kathleen M. Howley - Jun 14, 2010

Job growth will be the key factor in whether the U.S. real estate market can extend a recovery after the end of the federal homebuyer tax credit, according to a Harvard University study.

High unemployment is fueling the foreclosure crisis and discouraging the household formation that drives property demand, according to the State of the Nation’s Housing report issued today by Harvard’s Joint Center for Housing Studies. The weak labor market resulted in people “doubling up,” or sharing residences, rather than buying their own home, the report said.

“What happens with jobs will matter the most to the strength of the housing rebound,” said Eric Belsky, executive director for the center in Cambridge, Massachusetts. “If employment growth surprises on the upside or downside, housing numbers could too.”

The U.S. unemployment rate dropped to 9.7 percent last month from 9.9 percent in April, the Labor Department said June 4. For all of 2010, it probably will be 9.6 percent, the highest for any year since 1983, according to the average estimate of 82 economists polled by Bloomberg.

The homebuyer tax credit of as much as $8,000 required buyers to have a signed contract by April 30 and close on a property by July 1. The credit resulted in 1 million additional home sales between February 2009, when it began, and its expiration this year, according to Lawrence Yun, chief economist of the Chicago-based National Association of Realtors.

Consumer confidence now needs to improve for the market to sustain itself, he said in an interview. The percentage of consumers who planned to buy a home in the next six months fell to 1.9 percent in May after touching a seven-month high of 2.8 percent in March, the New York-based Conference Board said in a report last month.

‘Self-Fulfilling Prophecy’

“It comes down to whether consumers perceive that the market has bottomed or if they continue to wait,” Yun said. “If they wait, it pushes the market down and becomes a self- fulfilling prophecy.”

Mounting foreclosures are another headwind for a real estate recovery, according to the Harvard report. There were 2.1 million loans in the foreclosure process in the first quarter, almost quadruple the number from three years ago.

“The foreclosure trend is going to get worse before it gets better,” Thomas Lawler, an independent housing consultant in Leesburg, Virginia, said in an interview. “The biggest risk for housing is that you’ll see more foreclosed homes hitting the market and not have an offsetting rebound in household formation triggered by a recovering jobs market.”


Legal mess over foreclosures deepening

Todd Ruger of the Sarasota Herald Tribune brings us a very interesting article that discusses more legal maneuverings in the State of Florida.  The Florida Supreme Court is attempting to crack down on the often shoddy paperwork produced by the foreclosure mills that are strewn across the state.  They are focusing on incomplete filings that are being used to boot people out of their homes.

While several judges in Manatee and Sarasota Counties have used the rule to throw out several foreclosure cases in the last month, the foreclosure mills are not going down without a fight.  They are questioning the language in the rule that leaves open whether the rule is actually enforceable...yet.

Mr. Ruger comments, “The bottom line for homeowners: when a foreclosure is filed, do not give up your property easily. Rather, make sure the bank or lender retaking your home has the paperwork to show it can, attorneys say.”  Who best to fight the fight?  You got it...a foreclosure defense attorney.

Legal mess over foreclosures deepening
By Todd Ruger


An attempt to fix the sloppy legal work plaguing thousands of foreclosure cases in Florida has been ineffective, and has now caused a legal mess of its own.


The Florida Supreme Court got tough on attorneys for banks and lenders in February, responding to stories of homeowners losing their property based on shoddy or incomplete paperwork. The incomplete filings also wasted judicial resources and clogged up the courts.

To combat that, a new rule enacted by the high court requires the attorney or bank filing a foreclosure to verify -- under penalty of perjury -- that the allegations and paperwork are accurate when a residential property is at stake.

But attorneys have not followed the rule. Some contend they do not have to, arguing that the Supreme Court said the rule was not in effect yet.

"The decision by the Supreme Court in Florida specifically says 'Not final,'" said Miami attorney Gerald Richman, who is still fighting the new requirement on behalf of one of the state's largest foreclosure firms.

The issue may have to be settled by the Florida Supreme Court, though no action is scheduled.

The continuing problems with the foreclosure process could affect the speed at which the housing market recovers by slowing the process of reselling properties and stabilizing the market.

The vast majority of the state's housing lawsuits come from Florida's five so-called foreclosure mills, where attorneys can each handle thousands of cases gushing from the deflated housing market.

A court-sanctioned review of hundreds of residential foreclosure filings in Sarasota and Manatee counties -- unofficially dubbed "Stop the Slop" -- found that nearly all the lawsuits lacked basic documentation.

Of the 52 cases in the first round of review in Sarasota, all lacked the new verification requirement or other proof the bank is entitled to take the property, an attorney who reviewed the cases says.

Backed by local Chief Judge Lee Haworth, who served on the state task force that recommended the new rule, judges in Manatee and Sarasota counties used the new rule to throw out dozens of foreclosure complaints in the past month.

But Miami attorney Richman, who represents banks and lenders, contacted Haworth last week and told him he and the other judges were jumping the gun.

The confusion results from the wording of the Supreme Court's ruling.

Haworth, along with other judges and attorneys across the state, rely on the part of the ruling that states the rule "shall become effective immediately upon the release of this opinion." The opinion was released Feb. 11.

But the foreclosure mills cite a line later in the opinion that states the ruling is "not final" until any motions for rehearing are considered. That interpretation delays implementation of the rule, which benefits their bottom lines because verifying the documents takes time and could bring perjury accusations if wrong.

Richman filed a motion for rehearing in February, saying the new rule needs to be clarified. But the top court has not acted on that motion, set a date to hear arguments or otherwise clarified its ruling.

A spokesman for the Supreme Court said ethical rules prevent anyone there from commenting on the opinion, or clarifying whether the verification rule is in effect.

The confusion sent Haworth backpedaling last week, after Richman said his client would appeal the tossing of the cases. Haworth temporarily suspended that part of the "Stop the Slop" program Friday, saying he was not alone in having questions.

"I'm expecting they'll do something to clarify the situation," Haworth said.

The bottom line for homeowners: when a foreclosure is filed, do not give up your property easily. Rather, make sure the bank or lender retaking your home has the paperwork to show it can, attorneys say.

Sarasota-Bradenton had one foreclosure for every 61 housing units last year, according to RealtyTrac. There were 544,000 foreclosure filings in Florida last year.

The number of foreclosures spiked following the downturn in Florida's housing market and the mortgage crisis.

Courts in Sarasota and across the state started "rocket dockets" to handle cases in bulk and more quickly, even as examples of poor lawyering for banks and lenders came to light.

Some of the most egregious Florida examples come from Sarasota County. In one case, an attorney for a lender used a false reason to schedule a Sarasota widow's home for a foreclosure sale. A judge canceled that sale.

And one circuit judge in Sarasota, after an attorney assured her everything was in order, happened to glance at foreclosure paperwork and realized the two properties were in Miami, far outside her jurisdiction.

Judges have said they can only catch a few errors as they try to keep the rest in line, and do not have the resources to police all the complaints.

Foreclosure defense attorneys had already pointed to Haworth's "Stop the Slop" program as an example that should be followed across the state.

Haworth said he will continue policing foreclosure documents aside from the Supreme Court verification requirements.


I sent out a newsletter last year regarding the subject of pets and foreclosures.  Cheryl Hanna from the Rescue Examiner reminds us that 1,000,000+ pets this year will be affected by foreclosures.  I have a Labrador Retriever and 2 cats.  The loss of them would be difficult to swallow.

If you have pets or know someone that does, take the time to read the entire article.

Pet owners facing tough times with foreclosures
May 23, 8:57 PM Pet Rescue Examiner Cheryl Hanna

According to the ASPCA, one million pets could lose their homes this year due to tough economic conditions. With 63% of US households having at least one pet, it is up to us as responsible owners to provide proper care, reciprocal respect and love when faced with tough financial decisions pertaining to our pets.

In order to keep a pet with us  when facing home foreclosure, it is necessary to start planning well in advance. Start with saving money. Ask your vet if there is a less expensive, but still nutritious pet food you can use. When supplies are needed, go to thrift stores or garage sales. In order to save on veterinarian bills,  just  get the most vital vaccinations and preventative health care. Always keep your dog on a leash; safety is a great way to keep medical emergencies to a minimum. Sometimes pet insurance on young animals is very cost effective and can minimize the shock and cost of an unexpected injury.

When looking for a new place to live, utilize the internet and locate real estate agents who specialize in pet friendly properties. Apartments have to accept children, but do not have to accept pets. Find websites that list pet friendly rentals. If the landlord is reluctant to allow a pet, provide documentation that shows you are a responsible owner. Show the landlord veterinarian records of vaccinations, spay/neuter, and rabies certificates. Ask your vet for a reference letter to show a landlord how you are a responsible pet owner. Reach out to family, friends, and co-workers to temporarily care for your pet until you find a new home.

Never underestimate the power of local assistance to help you keep your pet. Pet food pantries have become popular since it is less expensive to subsidize food expenses than taking in someone's pet. There are also low cost veterinarian care available, boarding facilities and placement services. The Pet Pantry in Richmond Virginia's SPCA provides food for those owners suffering financial hardships.
The Humane Society of the United States has a Pet Foreclosure Fund, and $80,000 in grants are available through local non-profit organizations to help organize food banks, subsidize veterinarian care, low cost spay and neuter programs, foster care and provide help with security deposits for animal friendly rentals.

There are also organizations that can provide temporary placement and can search for animal shelter and organizations in your area where you can surrender ownership of your pets which do not euthanize adoptable animals. At www.petfinder.com, you can be connected to a shelter who will care for your pet up to 60 days for no cost, and then you can be reunited. If you do not reclaim your pet, the animal will be put up for adoption. Some organizations are also able to find foster homes for temporary care until you get yourself re-established.
If you plan to put your pet up for adoption, never place an ad, "Free to Good Home." Always ask for an adoption fee and write out a contract so you have peace of mind that your pet has been offered some written protection by you.

Be aware that local animal control and humane society shelters that offer local open admission and accepts all animals ( strays too) do not guarantee adoption. If the shelter is overcrowded, your pet may be facing euthanasia no matter what breed, what age or what temperament. It is absolutely critical you always ask questions before surrendering your pet.

There are many options people  have for their pets when faced with foreclosure, but don't ever leave an animal behind to fend for themselves. There are too many horror stories of dogs and cats patiently waiting for their families to return while they slowly die of starvation and dehydration. A dog or cat can become dehydrated within 24 hours without water and could die in extreme heat within a few days. Animals have been deserted and found tied to trees, and thrown away like trash and dumped in the "country."

In  all states animal abandonment is considered neglect and animal abuse, and in some states an owner could face felony animal cruelty charges with mandatory prison time and fines.  There is no excuse to abandon an animal; some consider it the highest form of animal cruelty.

Stagecoach log home goes to foreclosure

Tom Ross from Steamboat Today reports on a ski house that recently went to foreclosure.  While this in itself is not an interesting story, the background behind it sounds familiar.

Ultimately the house was taken back by the bank for $350,000.  The listing realtor had an offer for $330,000 placed with Chase 2 months before the auction.  Doing the math, when you incorporate holding costs, insurance, taxes etc, the bank probably would have fared better with the $330,000 offer.  Why Chase didn’t accept it is anyone's guess.

When I read the article I noticed a few things.  First and foremost was that the listing agent appears to have tried to negotiate the short sale herself.  In my opinion, that’s a huge mistake and a massive waste of time.  I noted that she was trying to communicate with the banks attorney...again a big mistake.  Who is better positioned to negotiate with a lenders attorney, a realtor or the sellers attorney?  With all due respect to the realtors that are reading this, my money is with the attorney to attorney negotiation.

While previous offers weren’t discussed, the story seems to imply that the $330,000 offer came within a few months of the sale date.  This, unfortunately, is an issue that realtors can be plagued with.  That of retail buyers coming and going.  Ask me how we address this issue (and others).

Stagecoach log home goes to foreclosure
By Tom RossSunday, May 23, 2010

Steamboat Springs — A property auction at the Routt County Courthouse this week illustrated the thin line in today’s distressed home market between losing one’s home to foreclosure and salvaging a portion of one’s credit rating.

Steamboat Springs Realtor Denise Cantafio was frustrated Wednesday when her clients’ log home in Stagecoach was claimed by the original lender in a public trustee’s sale.

“That was a sale that really shouldn’t have happened,” Cantafio said. “We’ve had a standing offer of $330,000 on that home for two months.”

Chase Home Finance took the home back during a foreclosure sale at the Routt County Courthouse on Wednesday morning after no third-party bidders appeared to top the bank’s own deficiency bid of $349,726 on the home in the Meadowgreen subdivision. A bid of an amount just $1 higher than the bank’s bid would have claimed the home that sold for $695,000 in August 2007, virtually at the peak of the Steamboat real estate bubble.

Cantafio was representing the previous owner in a short sale process when another Realtor brought her a buyer who made the $330,000 offer. It was within $20,000 of what the bank indicated it was willing to accept in the foreclosure auction, and Cantafio was optimistic at the time.

Cantafio, who is with Real Living Real Estate in Steamboat Springs, said she has helped to close several short sales in the recent past. It’s a process that results when a homeowner realizes that a change in their circumstances, for example a job loss, means they won’t be able to keep up with their mortgage payments. Instead of waiting until they are in arrears on their mortgage payments, they go to the bank and work out a plan in which the bank agrees to sell the property for less than what is owed on the mortgage.

Even when the sale is successful, the homeowner loses their property and their equity, but the hit to their credit is not as severe as it would be in a foreclosure.

Routt County Public Trus tee Jeanne Whiddon said Wed nesday the total outstanding indebtedness on the home at 23425 Willow Highland Trail was $587,730.

Stephen Caragol, who invests in distressed properties, said the home, built in 2006, appeared to be an attractive investment. However, he did not attend Wednesday’s sale.

Caragol’s Steamboat-based company, Blue Rhino Investments, sometimes acquires foreclosed properties in Routt County, but more often in Front Range cities. He said that had the Meadowgreen home been offered at foreclosure auction in a market with a community of active investors, it might have been bid up to the neighborhood of $375,000.

The two-story, four-bedroom, 3.5-bath home comprises a total of 2,299 square feet. Of that, 1,713 square feet is livable space, according to records at the Routt County Assessor’s Office. The home has a two-car garage and luxuries such as granite countertops and a large corner bathtub. Large log posts support the vaulted paneled ceiling in the great room. Of course, there are views of Stagecoach Reservoir.

Cantafio said when she initially described the short-sale offer to a representative of Chase, she was told not to submit it because it was too low. She said an attorney representing the bank advised them to take a closer look, and she submitted the offer despite instructions to the contrary. She called the representative weeks later and was told again that the offer was too low.

Typically, the next step would be for the bank to engage a Realtor specializing in foreclosures to sell the house.

Efforts to reach the previous owner of the home at a phone number in Westminster were unsuccessful.

New Poll Reveals Americans' Feelings On Foreclosure

Daniel Indiviglio from the Atlantic reports on a recent poll that discusses how Americans feel with the subject of foreclosure.  While foreclosure used to be a social stigma, it is now a topic of conversation at cocktail parties.  A couple of interesting tidbits from the poll:

  • 1% of respondents said that walking away is their first choice if they are unable to pay their mortgage. 69% would first try modification. Clearly, most people want to remain in their homes
  • 59% polled said they would not consider walking away from their home no matter how much it is underwater. Of course, the flipside is that 41% would consider it
  • 78% of those polled believed there were downsides to buying a foreclosed property. That might sound like a lot, but it's lower than the 85% who had that same response a year earlier.
  • 92% of those polled said they would be willing to invest in improvements such as renovations and remodeling if they purchase a foreclosed home. Moreover, 65% of that group would be willing to invest up to 20% of the home's purchase price in upgrades. This provides a little hope that some construction jobs could return as more foreclosures continue to be bought up.
  • Foreclosure activity will likely peak in 2011, according to Sharga. He says somewhere between 5 and 5.5 million mortgages are in some stage of serious delinquency. He expects foreclosures to reach normal levels in late 2013. But he also believes that banks' strategy of releasing foreclosures into the market slowly should keep prices from falling much further nationally. At the same time, however, he doesn't expect prices to rise much, if at all, over the next several years.


While statistics are just that...statistics, they do provide a window that shows what has happened.  It’s apparent that foreclosures will be with us for awhile and price stability is further away than expected.

New Poll Reveals Americans' Feelings On Foreclosure
MAY 21 2010

Do homeowners like the idea of walking away from their homes? Are many Americans considering buying foreclosed properties? Do they intend to spend much to renovate them? These are a few of the questions answered by a new poll sponsored by foreclosure expert RealtyTrac and real estate search website Trulia.com. Its results and the market observations of executives from these two companies provide some insight into the future of housing.

The Underwater Problem

At this point, most foreclosures aren't caused by wacky subprime mortgage products: they're caused by unemployment. And if you don't have any equity -- or even negative equity -- in your home, then you may be less likely to do whatever it takes to prevent foreclosure. These so-called underwater borrowers now make up one out of five mortgages in the U.S. They're driving foreclosures at this time.

But according to the poll, a mere 1% of respondents said that walking away is their first choice if they are unable to pay their mortgage. 69% would first try modification. Clearly, most people want to remain in their homes.

Another problem is strategic default. This occurs when homeowners actually can pay, but since they are so far underwater, they decide to default instead. Yet, 59% polled said they would not consider walking away from their home no matter how much it is underwater. Of course, the flipside is that 41% would consider it, which is a sizable portion of homeowners who could consider strategic default.

Interest in Foreclosures

So what's going to happen to all these foreclosures -- someone has to buy them. It turns out that there's a little less negative stigma surrounding foreclosures these days.78% of those polled believed there were downsides to buying a foreclosed property. That might sound like a lot, but it's lower than the 85% who had that same response a year earlier.

Yet, the poll also revealed that 45% of adults are at least somewhat likely to consider purchasing a foreclosed home in the future. That's lower than the 55% who had this response a year ago. This is a little bit worrying, as there are an awful lot of foreclosures available, and those numbers aren't slowing down very much.

Finally, 57% of renters said they were at least somewhat likely to purchase a foreclosed home in the future, while only 40% of homeowners said they would consider it. Again, these numbers aren't very impressive, considering how many foreclosed homes have and will continue to hit the market.

Renovating the Job Market

Construction was probably the biggest industry hit by the collapse of the housing market and recession that followed. Many of those jobs aren't coming back, but if renovations to foreclosed properties ramp up, some of these workers will find employment. The good news is that 92% of those polled said they would be willing to invest in improvements such as renovations and remodeling if they purchase a foreclosed home. Moreover, 65% of that group would be willing to invest up to 20% of the home's purchase price in upgrades. This provides a little hope that some construction jobs could return as more foreclosures continue to be bought up.

Shadow Inventory

On the conference call to discuss the poll results, RealtyTrac Senior Vice President Rick Sharga also discussed the foreclosure market in general. He spent some time explaining that there was still a significant shadow foreclosure inventory. Those are defaulted homes banks are purposely preventing from hitting the real estate market. He said that banks are releasing these properties slowly, so not to flood the market and bring down prices.

How big is the shadow inventory? According to Sharga, it consists of about two-and-a-half times as many foreclosed properties as are currently available for sale. That's probably around 600,000, says Sharga. And that doesn't include the additional properties that default each month.

Looking for Recovery

So how long will homeowners foreclose at elevated rates? Quite a while. Foreclosure activity will likely peak in 2011, according to Sharga. He says somewhere between 5 and 5.5 million mortgages are in some stage of serious delinquency. He expects foreclosures to reach normal levels in late 2013. But he also believes that banks' strategy of releasing foreclosures into the market slowly should keep prices from falling much further nationally. At the same time, however, he doesn't expect prices to rise much, if at all, over the next several years.

The Other Foreclosure Menace

The national news is plastered with articles about people losing their homes due to delinquent mortgage payments.  Fred Schulte from the Huffington Post reports on another way people are losing their homes to foreclosure for much smaller amounts of money.  

When people fail to pay property taxes, city liens etc, the municipalities sell these liens to investors.  Investors earn a certain percentage when the liens are redeemed or paid off.  If the liens are not paid off, the investor has the right to foreclose, oftentimes securing the title to the house for very little money (i.e. for the price they paid for the lien).

When working on short sales, I would highly suggest (whether you are a realtor or buyer) you secure a preliminary title search.  While home owners typically have a handle on what is owed, many forget all of the liens that are attached to the property.  A preliminary title search should give you an indication of what is owed and to whom.  I hope this helps.

The Other Foreclosure Menace
Mortgage Paid Off, Woman Loses Home -- Over a Small Water Bill

By Fred Schulte, Ben Protess and Lagan Sebert
Huffington Post Investigative Fund

Valentine lost the two-story brick row home after the city sold her debt to investors through a contentious and byzantine legal process called a "tax sale." (Photo by Lagan Sebert / Investigative Fund)

One raw day in early February, Vicki Valentine stood by helplessly as real estate investors snatched her West Baltimore home over what began with an unpaid city water bill of $362.

As snow threatened to fall, she watched a work crew hired by the new owners punch out the lock on her front door. A sheriff’s deputy was on the scene while Valentine and her teenage son piled whatever they could into a borrowed car.

Running out of time, Valentine scrambled to pack up clothing and mementos. The home had been her family’s for nearly three decades, and her father had paid off the mortgage in 1984. “It’s hard to say goodbye to this house,” she said. “It’s like someone forcing you out of something that belongs to you. I don’t get it.”

Valentine lost the two-story brick row home after the city sold her debt to investors through a contentious and byzantine legal process called a “tax sale.” This little-known type of foreclosure can enrich investors as growing numbers of property owners struggle to pay their bills.

These foreclosed homeowners are not the families making headlines for taking on mortgages they could ill afford. Families ensnared in the tax sale sometimes are unable to overcome relatively small debts owed to local tax collectors.

Rather than collect the overdue money they are owed, many local governments are selling tax liens. Buyers range from behemoths such as JPMorgan Chase & Co, and some regional banks and law firms, to small-fry investors lured by late-night television commercials promising quick riches. Investors generally bid in an auction for the right to collect delinquent taxes and other municipal debts on property owners, sometimes by paying only a few hundred dollars. When owners can’t pay, investors can pick up property at bargain prices.

It can be a good deal for everyone except the property owner. Selling the debts to investors can help governments efficiently ease budget woes without having the added expenses of debt collection, foreclosing and being a landlord.

Investors, meanwhile, can rake in hefty profits. That’s because they can tack on fees and steep interest rates, which can amount to 18 percent annually in Baltimore.

In Valentine’s case, legal fees and other charges climbed past $3,600 – nearly 10 times her original bill.

Investors purchased an estimated $30 billion of real estate tax debt held by governments across the country in 2009, double the amount a year earlier, according to the Florida-based National Tax Lien Association. Altogether, 29 states and the District of Columbia can sell tax lien debt to investors.

Lien sales in Baltimore have nearly doubled since the housing bubble of 2006. On Monday, the city sold 12,689 liens – a probable record. Properties ranged from boarded-up shells and vacant lots to row homes in gentrified neighborhoods and some commercial buildings.

Last February, Vicki Valentine was evicted when she couldn't pay $3,603.41 to rescue her Baltimore home. Valentine's wasn't a typical foreclosure -- the mortgage was paid off. But when she failed to pay a $362.28 water bill, the city auctioned her debt off in a tax lien sale. An investor now owns her home.

City records show that one in five of these liens on properties is for unpaid taxes or other municipal bills amounting to $1,000 or less. If Baltimore’s 2009 tax sale is any indication, hundreds will stem from delinquent water bills; there were 666 such liens last year.

Although the brisk tax lien trade thrives beneath the radar, largely unnoticed, it has occasionally drawn scrutiny from law enforcement authorities.

Some of Maryland’s most prominent tax sale investors have been swept up in a criminal investigation into bid rigging at the sales. Federal prosecutors allege that those investors agreed in advance which properties to bid at some auctions, improperly reducing the money earned by municipalities.

So far, Justice Department prosecutors have secured three convictions in the ongoing investigation. At a May 4 sentencing hearing for two of the defendants, a witness for the government was lawyer John Reiff, part-owner of the company that currently owns Valentine’s lien. He was not charged in the case.

Investing in liens can be risky, with profit on a particular property anything but certain. Investors generally compensate for such uncertainty by buying in large volumes, sometimes at a clip of thousands of liens each year.

Two of the investors who pleaded guilty in the bid rigging case made at least $10 million from fees and other costs collected from owners of some 6,000 property liens they bought over six years, according to federal prosecutors.

Prosecutors said in court filings they suspect bid-rigging occurs in other areas of the country. A JPMorgan subsidiary called Xspand and at least two other companies received grand jury subpoenas last year as part of a Justice Department anti-trust investigation in New Jersey, according to Bloomberg.

‘Unintended Consequences’

Some state lawmakers have questioned the fairness of the tax sale foreclosure process,  which often sticks homeowners with thousands of dollars in legal fees and other costs. But cities and counties in Maryland earlier this year fended off an effort to keep water bills out of the tax sale, arguing that without the threat of losing homes many people would fail to pay their bills.

Revenue collectors defend their tax sales as a necessary, if sometimes distasteful, means for feeding the public treasury. In aging cities such as Baltimore, there’s also hope that new owners will rehab decaying or abandoned properties, restoring them to the tax rolls.

Investors say they aren’t the bad guys – they’re providing a service that helps plug holes in municipal budgets. Homeowners should face consequences for failing to pay their bills, they argue, noting that people faced with losing property have many opportunities to redeem it. The mounting fees, they say, reflect the costs involved in navigating complex legal requirements, tracking down property owners and taking them to court to enforce the liens. In Valentine’s case, they noted, a judge approved the fees.

“We are essentially the city’s bill collector,” said lawyer and tax lien investor Reiff.

Critics of tax sales question the morality of government tax collectors acting to enrich private investors at the expense of property owners with low incomes or facing hard times. They ask whether it's the best way to compel people to honor their debts — especially involving relatively paltry public utility bills.

After all, when water bills go unpaid, some cities and counties simply shut off service. In Baltimore, officials often leave it on. Another alternative would be to have private collection agencies track down debtors.

“This is a case where good intentions have led to severe unintended consequences,” said Debra Gardner, of the Public Justice Center in Baltimore, a non-profit advocacy group for minorities and the poor.

Asked about Valentine’s story, David Vladeck, director the Federal Trade Commission's Bureau of Consumer Protection in Washington, said it was “just horrifying to me."
While noting that his comments did not reflect agency policy, Vladeck said he believed more recession-wracked homeowners across the country could face a similar plight. “It’s beyond tragic that this poor woman lost her home.”

Pleas – and More Fees

Valentine was incredulous when the price to keep her property shot past $3,600. Jobless and lacking the savings to pay, she said she could do little to stave off the day of reckoning.

That day arrived on February 3, when a Baltimore City Sheriff’s Department deputy served her with a court-issued “writ of possession” stripping her claim to the home.

Valentine, a former mental health counselor and rehab specialist with four children, said she moved back to her childhood home about a decade ago to care for her ailing father, Charles L. Turner. A retired brewery worker, he had Alzheimer’s disease.

As his condition worsened, he tended to hide bills from the family. (City records confirm that Turner often fell behind in meeting his obligations during the final years of his life and nearly wound up in the tax sale as early as 2000 over unpaid water bills and property taxes.)

When her father died in 2003, Valentine took over the home and stayed there with her son, Dimitrian, now 17. She said she fell into a serious depression in the wake of her father’s deteriorating health and death, and was unable to work or pay her bills on time. She has worked only sporadically since his death. Though she made partial payments on the water and sewer account in 2006, she acknowledges her failure to pay a bill of $462.28 in full. She went down to city hall and paid $100, but never took care of the balance.

When the deadline passed for paying up, the city added 2005-2006 property taxes of $287.92, interest and city tax-sale processing charges. That brought the total she owed to $710.57, according to city records.

The City of Baltimore washed its hands of Valentine’s debt in May 2006 when it sold the lien to Sunrise Atlantic LLC, an arm of the BankAtlantic in Fort Lauderdale. The Florida bank has bid on tax liens in a range of states, from Florida to Illinois, though it has largely sold off its Maryland lien portfolio and is not implicated in the bid-rigging case. BankAtlantic did not return phone calls seeking comment.

Unlike mortgage foreclosures initiated by banks, there’s no appealing a tax sale debt once it is sold off; a property owner has no option other than to abide by the investors’ terms and pay the fees. The lien holders also have little incentive to be flexible about repayment terms.

Maryland law gives property owners six months to redeem a tax lien with only minimal added costs. But if they don’t pay by then, lien holders can sue to seize the property and stick the homeowner with a slew of fees, including legal bills incurred in taking the matter to court. Sunrise Atlantic filed such a case on Valentine’s home in Baltimore City Circuit Court in December 2006, records show.

More than a year later, the court awarded the property to Sunrise Atlantic.

At that point, Valentine sent a handwritten letter to the court, begging for mercy and more time to repay.

In the letter, dated Feb. 9, 2008, Valentine described being unable to work because of depression and other problems. “For now, this is the roof over my son and my head. I am trying to get the money together to catch up on my delinquent bills.” She added: “Please allow more time to pay all bills connected with the foreclosure of said property.”

But the longer she waited and the more she protested, the more legal fees and other charges she incurred.

In 2008, Baltimore attorney Anthony De Laurentis, who represented Sunrise Atlantic, submitted itemized charges to the court: $305.91 in interest on the lien; a $1,500 bill for responding to Valentine’s requests to cut the fees and other legal work; more than $1,000 in assorted expenses, including $325 for a title search of the property and $79 for photocopies, according to court records.

The price list passed muster with a judge, who on Sept. 19, 2008 ordered that Valentine pay $3,603.41 – or forfeit her property.

She asked for another hearing, which delayed the process for more than a year.

While the case dragged on, the Florida bank started divesting its tax lien certificates from Maryland, eventually transferring the lien on Valentine’s home to a firm called Montego Bay Properties. Part of the firm is owned by a trust set up to benefit members of the family of lawyer De Laurentis. Reiff, one of De Laurentis’ law partners, also owns part of the firm.

In an interview in their Baltimore office, De Laurentis and Reiff said 90 percent or more of property owners eventually pay whatever is necessary to keep their homes.

They said most of the properties they take over are vacant and thus nobody is displaced. They also said they had repeatedly tried to settle the matter with Valentine and showed Investigative Fund reporters a thick file of court papers and other records as well as notes of more than a dozen contacts with her to make arrangements to clear the debt.

“We bent over backwards for her,” Reiff said, adding that his staff had tried for more than two years to “work something out” to no avail.

Feds Say Bids Rigged

Though Valentine had no way of knowing it, some investors rigged the 2006 Baltimore tax sale auction that led to her eviction, federal prosecutors alleged in court.

The roots of that conspiracy run deep, prosecutors said. For years, a handful of Baltimore real estate lawyers and their investment partners quietly dominated Maryland tax sale auctions, with few questions asked about their bidding tactics or collection policies.

That changed after The Baltimore Sun used city records and court filings to report in March 2007 that hundreds of mainly low-income city residents had been kicked out of their homes over small unpaid bills, ranging from water and sewer charges to minor environmental citations. Some people were driven from family property because they couldn’t afford to pay thousands of dollars demanded by lien holders.

The Baltimore newspaper also documented for the first time that while dozens of parties bid in Baltimore tax auctions in 2006 and 2007, just three investment groups had won about two-thirds of the liens.

Prosecutors went on to charge three men with conspiring to rig bids at 21 auctions in Baltimore and four other jurisdictions, including Montgomery and Prince George’s counties in the suburbs of Washington D.C. between 2002 and 2007. All three have since pleaded guilty. No other charges have been filed.

Another investment group involved in the conspiracy was DRT Fund, according to court filings by federal prosecutors. DRT is owned in part by De Laurentis and Reiff. DRT participated in a dozen of the 21 fixed auctions, though not the Baltimore City auction in 2006 in which Valentine’s lien was sold, according to court filings.

The Justice Department filed no charges against DRT, which came forward in the fall of 2007 and “fully and truthfully reported their own wrongdoing and that of their co-conspirators and terminated their part in the conspiracy,” prosecutors wrote in court papers filed last month.
DRT went on to sign an amnesty agreement with the Justice Department that commits it to “pay restitution to any person or entity injured as a result of the bid-rigging activity being reported in which it was a participant,” court records state.

Neither De Laurentis nor Reiff would discuss DRT’s settlement with the Justice Department.

Water Bill Woes

Some law makers have tried for years, with modest success, to rein in the tax-sale fees that can steamroll low-income homeowners. Maryland legislators passed a bill in 2008 that raised the minimum lien sold from $100 to $250. But a bill to prohibit cities and counties from selling delinquent water bills to investors failed in the state Senate earlier this year by a single vote.

Legislators also rejected a bill that would have prevented the sale of any lien of less than $750, as happens in some other locales outside of the state.

Both bills failed, lawmakers said, largely due to fierce opposition from tax collectors and officials in Baltimore, which conducts the largest tax sale in the state.

Andrea Mansfield, of the Maryland Association of Counties, testified that the tax sale process provides “a much-needed device to ensure that property owners remit payment for their fair share of taxes and charges connected to public services.”

Eliminating water bills from the tax sales would result in more “deficient accounts,” and lead to “increased rates on citizens who properly pay,” she wrote.

Sen. James Brochin, a Democrat from Baltimore County who co-sponsored the legislation that would have banned the sale of delinquent water bills to investors, vehemently disagrees. “It's just disgusting. It's highway robbery. It's dead wrong. It's immoral," he said.

While city officials publicly defend the practice, he said, in reality “they're humiliated and embarrassed by it. Deep down they know how immoral it is."

Baltimore’s mayor, Stephanie Rawlings-Blake, declined requests for an interview on the topic with the Investigative Fund.

City officials were more talkative earlier this year when they sought to block lawmakers from banning the sale of water bill liens. Mary Pat Fannon, a lobbyist for the mayor’s office, said in prepared testimony for a February 5 hearing that the city had begun offering repayment plans for water bills to help homeowners avoid tax sale.

She said that the 666 water bill liens sold by Baltimore City in 2009 was way down from the 1,129 sold to investors the previous year and credited the repayment plans for the reduction.

And she went further, testifying that nobody had lost a home due to an unpaid water bill from either sale in 2008 or 2009. What Fannon neglected to mention: Because of the lengthy transfer process in the courts, it was too early for those groups of property owners to begin losing their homes. Most tax sale lawsuits have taken longer than two years to resolve through the courts.

Fannon also said that without the tax sale, the city would need to file debt collection lawsuits against each delinquent property owner, which she said “would be very expensive, time consuming and flood the courts.”

Two days before Fannon’s testimony at the state capital, Valentine stood watching as her belongings piled up on the sidewalk in Baltimore.

A Neighborhood’s Decline

More than three years after Valentine’s small debt drew her into the tax sale, neither the city nor the investors seem to have won much.

The property is unlikely to be fixed up any time soon. Instead, it adds to a sense of decay that permeates some parts of urban Baltimore. On Valentine’s old block in the Sandtown neighborhood, all but a handful of houses, abandoned long ago, are boarded up.

Such decline has summoned other ills. “Drugs moved in and replaced the good with the bad,” said Valentine, who is living temporarily with her mother. Many of her possessions are in storage.

De Laurentis and Reiff now hold a “writ of possession” for a property that’s in need of substantial repair. Though the home is assessed at $46,000, in such dilapidated condition the investors said they probably would have trouble selling it for more than $16,000.

In addition, investors could be on the hook for a $7,000 water bill of their own. Just how that happened is unclear; there may have been an undetected leak in Valentine’s home. Last month, the city finally turned off the water.

If the investors take the final step to secure a deed to the property, they would have to pay the city roughly $6,300, which the city is then supposed to turn over to Valentine. The law entitles original property owners to receive at least some compensation.

De Laurentis and Reiff say they’re still willing to work with Valentine to resolve the matter. Reiff said he gave her a key to the new lock so she could > have more time to remove her belongings as a good faith gesture.

“We'll definitely work something out with her,” Reiff said.


Phoenix foreclosures attract Canadians

Marty Hope from the Calgary Herald reports on Canadian money coming back into the market. Because Canadian currency is increasing in value relative to the American dollar, Canadians are coming into the US and buying property in droves.  Now, it’s not just because of the strength of the Canadian currency that is ringing our friends form the North down.  They are seeing properties that can be purchased, and then rented with positive cash flow.

Phoenix foreclosures attract Canadians

Rents rising within Arizona city

BY MARTY HOPE, CALGARY HERALD
MAY 15, 2010

It was the end of the month -- and as in every city anywhere in North America, people were on the move.

From Scottsdale to Queen Creek, streets throughout greater Phoenix, Ariz., were dotted with half-ton trucks and rented vans moving families from one home to another.

In this desert state, relocation is always a big deal come month-end.

Some people are taking advantage of foreclosures to move around in the marketplace while others, unfortunately, are packing up because they've lost their homes.

Still others are getting into rental digs -- a proposition that is becoming challenging, says the Cromford Report, which tracks the current status of the Phoenix area resale market on a daily basis. Earlier this month, the analyst who publishes the report says demand for single-family home rentals is outrunning supply and causing an unprecedented fall in the inventory of available rentals.

I know there are several Calgarians who have become landlords in the Phoenix area, having scooped up firesale-priced homes as income-producing properties.

And as the Canadian dollar fights for parity with the U.S. greenback, there will, doubtless, be another wave of investors from here heading there.

An article in the Arizona Republic says that since last September, the number of available rental homes in metro Phoenix has dropped by 40 per cent.

If you're looking for family-sized homes in some of the more desirable neighborhoods, the decline is even more severe, says the article.

The sharp drop, the newspaper article suggests, is another ripple effect of the foreclosure crisis that is playing havoc with real estate across Arizona, but particularly in the Sonoran Valley metropolitan area.

My, how the rental market has turned.

In the early days of the foreclosure fiasco, foreclosures increased the number of houses in the rental market.

People who lost homes, or who just walked away from mortgages that were higher than the value of their home, found they could rent similar-sized houses, often in the same neighborhood, for less than their mortgage payments.

This was occurring all over, including many of the newer neighborhoods on the west side where the foreclosure total was huge. Even tenants with bad credit could negotiate lower rents and how long they wanted to stay.

I recall talking with realtor Mike Orr down there and asking why the west side was hit so badly with foreclosures.

"We had a circumstance down here among first-time buyers who would drive until they qualified -- and that happened mostly on the west side," he said.

But back to the rental situation. In the past few months, as more of those former owners became renters, demand for those three-to four-bedroom rental homes climbed.

As lenders foreclosed on more homes, but were slow to resell them, the number of available houses dropped.

When houses do come onto the rental market, rents are rising and landlords of family-size homes are receiving multiple offers and filling houses in days, said the Arizona Republic article. Orr said that while the detached home rental situation is worsening and rental agencies managing properties have waiting lists, many Phoenix area apartment complexes still are having a tough time attracting tenants.

If you're the least bit handy or have the money to hire someone to do some improvements, there are some great foreclosure opportunities at, or just under, $100,000 US in the Phoenix area.

Many of the homes, with posted notices of foreclosure taped to the front doors, are in desperate need of a good cleaning, new paint, flooring and wall repairs -- and in some of the more extreme cases, new walls to fix those damaged by frustrated or angry owners prior to leaving the property.

Queens DA: Fraud Scheme Preyed on Homeowners Facing Foreclosure

Chris Herring from the Wall Street Journal reports on a foreclosure fraud scheme that was cracked in NY City.  While the scheme took advantage of people in common ways (read the article), one part of it really stuck out.  The thieves were targeting properties that had legitimate equity in them but were also in preforeclosure.  If you are reading this you need to understand that some houses can solve their own problems.  In this case, houses with equity that are in pre foreclosure can typically be sold and settle the existing debt (obviously it depends on how much equity, how much debt but we will assume that the equity will more than cover the debt).  So, if you are in a situation where the property can be sold and cover the debt without putting the property through a short sale....do the right thing.

Queens DA: Fraud Scheme Preyed on Homeowners Facing Foreclosure


By Chris Herring

A group of 17 people was charged in a multimillion-dollar real estate fraud Thursday, a scam prosecutors say left some victims homeless. The list of those charged includes attorneys, mortgage brokers and real estate advisors.

The charges, brought forth by Queens District Attorney Richard Brown, accuse two men of having led a predatory scheme to take advantage of homeowners in Queens, Brooklyn and the Bronx who were trying to avoid going into foreclosure. Brown said the fraud cheated victims and various lending institutions out of more than $3 million of equity at 26 residential properties.

Prosecutors accused those in the scheme of targeting homeowners who had substantial equity in their homes but either faced foreclosure or were behind in mortgage payments.

Roger Huggins and Inderpaul Sookraj, who prosecutors pinpointed as the scheme’s ringleaders, are accused of setting up sham realty and construction companies in Queens. They face an array of first- and second-degree felony charges — including accusations larceny, money-laundering, identity-theft and falsified-records — and a maximum of 25 years in prison if convicted.

Among other things, prosecutors said Huggins and Hookraj basically stole peoples’ homes through trickery. The pair was charged with using false documents and forging their clients’ personal information to make it look like the homeowners had agreed to sell their homes over to Huggins and Hookraj.

In other cases, prosecutors said, they simply induced distressed homeowners into selling or transferring their properties for reduced prices — a move that allowed them to “flip” the properties and sell them for more.

Attorney information for Huggins and several other people charged wasn’t immediately available, as arraignments hadn’t begun as of early yesterday evening. The arraignments were expected to take start and run into night court. Prosecutors said Sookraj remained at large.

A pair of attorneys from Queens, Trevor Rupnerain and Shawn Chand, were also accused in the fraud. Prosecutors charged them with fraudulently preparing financial and real-estate documents when closing out deals with victims.

Chase's Foreclosure Disgrace

Greg Kaufman reports on what Chase has done to 3 homeowners that have played by the rules.  The article highlights 3 people that applied for and met all of the requirements for a permanent loan modification but were denied by Chase.  Mr. Kaufman surmises that the reason behind these (and may others I’m sure) rejections revolves around the fact the loan modifications are purely voluntary.

The particular homeowners that are highlighted in this article were also awarded foreclosures by Chase!  How nice of Chase to do so!  The home owners are not laying down, though.  They are suing Chase.  Can anyone say, “Class Action”?

Kaufman points out, “It doesn’t matter whether someone is losing their home because of a bad subprime mortgage, a lost job, or because they owe more on the mortgage than the home is now worth. Every foreclosure decreases the property value of a neighbor’s home. Every dollar lost in property value--and over $7 trillion in wealth has now been lost by American households--reduces local and state revenues. As revenues are lost, so are jobs and services. And the vicious cycle which devastates our communities continues. A HAMP program that was supposed to help three to four million homeowners has only made 230,000 permanent modifications. March set a new monthly record with 367,056 foreclosure filings, up nearly 19 percent from February, according to RealtyTrac, which has been tracking foreclosure filings since 2005.

So while loan mods are oftentimes good for the public, they are not embraced by the banks and the servicing companies.  As the lenders dawdle with these applications, houses slide closer and closer towards foreclosure.

Chase's Foreclosure Disgrace
Greg Kaufmann: If Big Banks Won't Play by the Rules, Where Does That Leave Homeowners in Distress?

Here's the problem with the Obama Administration’s approach to foreclosure prevention: it depends entirely on the banks voluntarily doing the right thing, even when homeowners have held up their end of the bargain to prevent a foreclosure.

Take the case of three homeowners in Queens, New York. Each one met the requirements for a “permanent” modification of their mortgages--which means a reduction of payments for five years--as laid out under the Administration’s Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP). They did so by making three months of trial modification payments to JP Morgan Chase and verifying their incomes. They had contracts with Chase and fulfilled their obligations under those contracts.

So how did Chase reward them?

Permanent modifications denied. Delinquency reports to credit rating agencies issued. And the cherry on top--foreclosure.

These three homeowners-each working full-time, with at least one job, working up to six days a week--are fighting back. With the help of the Urban Justice Center, a non-profit legal services provider in New York, they filed suit last Tuesday against the bank in federal court in Brooklyn.

“We want Chase to live up to the contracts that they entered into and give permanent modifications to these homeowners,” said Ted De Barbieri, an attorney at the Urban Justice Center. “If you’re going to sign onto HAMP, you have to follow the rules. These homeowners followed the rules, and now it’s time for Chase to.”

A spokesman for the bank told the Wall Street Journal that Chase would be “happy to talk with the customers, review their situations and see if we can help.”

This official response stands in stark contrast to what the homeowners have experienced in dealing with Chase up until now. De Barbieri said that prior to filing the lawsuit, even with the help of community-based HUD certified home loan counselors and the Urban Justice Center, the homeowners had been unable to get an adequate response from Chase.

Three Life Stories

Here’s a little moreinformation about these three citizens who Chase--post-lawsuit--suddenly says it will try to help.

Shanaz Begum lives with her husband and two sons--one of whom is headed to college in the fall--in a home they purchased in 2005. She fell behind on mortgage payments in September 2008 after she lost her job as manager of a retail business. Begum now works for the Department of Transportation on weekdays, and on weekends as a server at Boston Market. Her husband is a full-time taxicab driver. Begum has made trial modification payments of $1576 on time for eight months.

Tamara Williams lives with her two sons in a home she purchased in 2005 and has made three on-time trial payments of $1,274 this winter. She fell behind on her mortgage when she lost her job in November 2008, and went into foreclosure four months later. She now works doing post-renovation and demolition cleanup for a contractor and also attends school.

The lawsuit alleges that Chase instructed homeowner Alex Lam to deliberately miss mortgage payments in order to become eligible for a modification. Lam bought his house in 2002 and refinanced in 2005. Lam says he skipped payments in February and March of 2009 on the bank’s advice. Those are the only payments he has ever missed but he now faces foreclosure. Chase says its Net Present Value (NPV) test--required by HAMP to determine if the value of a modification is worth more to investors than a foreclosure--is the reason Lam isn’t receiving a modification. The infuriating thing about the NPV is that HAMP doesn’t require banks to disclose the data they use for their analysis. Banks don’t exactly have a stellar record for good behavior where transparency is lacking.

“The Obama administration’s program was supposed to give people like me a lifeline and a chance to save our homes. But if the banks won’t play by the rules, what else are we supposed to do?” said Williams.

That’s why more and more homeowners are turning to the courts. Reporter Paul Kiel of ProPublica writes that “at least 50 homeowners have recently filed lawsuits alleging the servicer foreclosed with a loan mod request pending or even while they were on a payment plan.” De Barbieri told me, “We’re part of an advocate community that’s representing homeowners who are in similar situations around the country. There are [similar] lawsuits in Massachusetts, Ohio, California, and Washington State. It’s one tool that advocates are using to do what’s right.”

As Kiel notes, there are still no penalties for servicers who don’t comply with the rules. According to the Wall Street Journal Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner recently “threatened to crack down on banks that don’t ‘hold up their end’ of the bargain.”  

But Treasury was whistling that same tune at a hearing in December. “We’re putting them on notice, and then we will exact penalties of them, and be publicly outspoken about who’s performing well and who’s not,” railed Herbert Allison, Assistant Secretary for Financial Stability. “We’re going to move to the point where we’re disciplining the banks if they don’t perform better than they are today.”

Move when exactly? I’m not sure which planet the Obama Administration is living on that they still believe the banks will do the right thing simply because they are being asked to--or because they are being offered a few carrots (a couple thousand dollars per modification--not even a garnish for the banks). Here on Earth, where the rest of us reside, we know that nothing will change until banks are forced to do the right thing.

Congressional Weakness

For that reason, the Housepassed legislation that would allow bankruptcy judges to modify the principal on people’s mortgages--known as a “cramdown”--for primary residences just like they are able to do for rich people’s vacation homes. It was defeated in the Senate. Why haven’t we seen one of President Obama’s virtuoso performances demanding that the weak-kneed Senate take it up again--perhaps even as an amendment to the financial reform bill?

Representatives Raúl Grijalva and Marcy Kaptur have also introduced legislation that would allow homeowners the right to rent at fair market rental value for five years once they receive a foreclosure notice. Not only would that allow homeowners time to find alternative affordable housing, or new employment, it would give them time to expose banks like Chase for any bad behavior. The right to rent concept was initially proposed by Dean Baker, co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research, and has been embraced by individuals across the political spectrum.

Grijalva and Kaptur also signed a letter to Secretary Geithner along with twenty-five House Democratic colleagues suggesting the establishment of “a new federal entity” modeled after FDR’s Home Owners’ Loan Corporation (HOLC), to be capitalized through remaining TARP funds. The letter notes, “During the Great Depression, the government successfully acquired, refinanced, serviced and sold more than a million mortgages, accounting for one in every five non-farm dwellings in the United States. Such actions prevented untold foreclosures, and even managed to return a small profit to the Treasury.”

Finally, in towns like Philadelphia, mandatory mediation has proven effective in foreclosure prevention. Rhode Island Democratic Senator Jack Reed has introduced legislation that would create an $80 million grant program to support those kinds of efforts.  

A Treasury spokesman told me the Administration is very concerned about moral hazard--rewarding people for taking out loans they never should have taken. But clearly the most hazardous moral around is continuing to cater to the banks’ interests.  

It doesn’t matter whether someone is losing their home because of a bad subprime mortgage, a lost job, or because they owe more on the mortgage than the home is now worth. Every foreclosure decreases the property value of a neighbor’s home. Every dollar lost in property value--and over $7 trillion in wealth has now been lost by American households--reduces local and state revenues. As revenues are lost, so are jobs and services. And the vicious cycle which devastates our communities continues. A HAMP program that was supposed to help three to four million homeowners has only made 230,000 permanent modifications. March set a new monthly record with 367,056 foreclosure filings, up nearly 19 percent from February, according to RealtyTrac, which has been tracking foreclosure filings since 2005.   

As John Taylor, president and CEO of the National Community Reinvestment Coalition, recently put it, “Everybody has a dog in this hunt when it comes to these foreclosures.”

This week in Brooklyn, three Queens’ homeowners took action. They said to the banks, “No more,” and the court is giving Chase until the end of the month to respond.

The time for President Obama to show that kind of toughness with the banks is tragically overdue.

(The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of the author.)


Phony Audits: A New Twist on Foreclosure Rescue Scams

The Federal Trade Commission reports on the latest flavor of the month...Forensic Loan Audits.   Forensic Loan Audits are being sold as a way for consumers to “beat the bank.”  The idea is for the auditor to comb through the mortgage documents of a seller in pre foreclosure in an attempt to provide discrepancies.  Lore has it that some of these companies promise “forgiveness of all debt.”

Some excerpts from the report include:

In exchange for an upfront fee of several hundred dollars, so-called forensic loan auditors, mortgage loan auditors, or foreclosure prevention auditors backed by forensic attorneys offer to review your mortgage loan documents to determine whether your lender complied with state and federal mortgage lending laws. The “auditors” say you can use the audit report to avoid foreclosure, accelerate the loan modification process, reduce your loan principal, or even cancel your loan.

Nothing could be further from the truth. According to the FTC and its law enforcement partners:

  • there is no evidence that forensic loan audits will help you get a loan modification or any other foreclosure relief, even if they’re conducted by a licensed, legitimate and trained auditor, mortgage professional or lawyer.
  • some federal laws allow you to sue your lender based on errors in your loan documents. But even if you sue and win, your lender is not required to modify your loan simply to make your payments more affordable.
  • if you cancel your loan, you will lose your home and you will have to return the money you borrowed to your lender.


If you are in default on your mortgage or facing foreclosure, you may be targeted by a foreclosure rescue scam. The FTC wants you to know how to recognize the telltale signs and report them. If you are faced with foreclosure, the FTC says legitimate options are available to help you save your home.

Don’t get me wrong, there are legitimate companies that perform loan audits (typically involving attorneys) and their are legitimate reasons to have your loan docs audited.  Beware of false promises.  If the company wants to charge an up front fee, think twice.

If you want to read the bulletin, go to:

http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/pubs/consumer/alerts/alt177.shtm

Phony Audits: A New Twist on Foreclosure Rescue Scams

May 10, 2010by FTC

WASHINGTON, D.C. - May 10, 2010 - (RealEstateRama) — If you are facing default on your mortgage or foreclosure on your home, watch out for the latest scam:  phony “forensic mortgage loan audits.”  Con artists claim that for an upfront fee, their audits can help you hold onto your home.  Don’t believe them.

In a new consumer alert, Forensic Mortgage Loan Audit Scams:  A New Twist on Foreclosure Rescue Fraud, the Federal Trade Commission provides consumers with information and legitimate resources to help save their homes.

To read the alert and learn more about how to spot and avoid forensic mortgage loan audit scams, go to:  http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/pubs/consumer/alerts/alt177.shtm.

The Federal Trade Commission works for consumers to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair business practices and to provide information to help spot, stop, and avoid them.  To file a complaint in English or Spanish, visit the FTC’s online Complaint Assistant or call 1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-4357).  The FTC enters complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database available to more than 1,800 civil and criminal law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad.  The FTC’s Web site provides free information on a variety of consumer topics.




High-End Homeowners Falling Into Foreclosure Trap

Joseph Pisani from CNBC reports on a growing trend in the distressed real estate market.  More and more Luxury Homes (defined as homes with mortgages that are equal to or greater than $1,000,000) are falling into foreclosure.  According to Mr. Pisani, in February of 2010, 4169 homes were in some stage of foreclosure, which represented an increase of 121% versus last year.

Pisani also reports, “Data shows that that may be the case around the county. The 90-day delinquency rate on home loans worth over a million dollars hit a high in February at 13.3 percent, higher than the overall rate of 8.6 percent, according to real estate data firm First American CoreLogic. Foreclosure proceedings generally begin to start after a homeowner has been at least 90 days late on a mortgage payment, experts say”

An interesting observation from the article echoes what we have been saying for a very long time, ““Lenders are far more likely to go the short sale route," says Andrew LePage, an analyst at real estate research firm DataQuick. "There’s a lot more money at stake, and maintenance can be high if a foreclosure just sits there.”  Lenders don’t want high end homes back.  They weigh their bottom line down...they are difficult to sell...they are expensive to maintain etc etc.  

So if you are not focusing on the high end market, don’t you think that you should start?

High-End Homeowners Falling Into Foreclosure Trap

By: Joseph Pisani
CNBC News Associate

Heated pools, ocean views and media rooms are not what most people would expect to find in a foreclosed property, but more high-end homes—priced over a million dollars—have been falling into the hands of banks this year.

Foreclosures of homes worth over $1 million began increasing at the end of 2009, according to exclusive data provided by foreclosure tracking website RealtyTrac. Foreclosures reached a high in February 2010, the last month data is available, when 4,169 homes were somewhere in the foreclosure process; either having received a foreclosure notice, had an auction scheduled or the lender took ownership of the property. That’s a 121 percent increase from a year ago.

The deterioration comes just as housing experts say that foreclosures in the low- and mid- ends of the housing market are showing signs of stabilization.

“They were able to stave off foreclosure longer,” says independent real estate analyst Jack McCabe, CEO of McCabe Research and Consulting in South Florida. “Lower-end homeowners were the first ones to see the escalating foreclosures because they generally do not have the cash reserves or credit available that the luxury homeowners do. They had the ability to take their credit cards and pull out thousands of dollars while the lower end buyers were already tapped out.”

McCabe expects to see foreclosures in the high-end market to increase into 2011.

Though the RealtyTrac data is not available on a regional or metropolitan basis, anecdotal evidence indicates the problem is cropping up across the country. Of course, the high-end and luxury categories vary widely from market to market. In some suburban areas of the Northeast and California, for instance, million-dollar homes are fairly common, but nationwide, they represent only 1.1 percent of the overall housing stock.

“We have seen an in
crease, in the million-plus range, of the number of foreclosures and short sales in the greater Chicago area,” says Jim Kinney, vice president of luxury home sales at Baird and Warner.

He says that of the 295 million-dollar, single-family properties sold in the January-April period this year, 37 were either a foreclosure or short sale (when a bank and homeowner agree to sell the home for less than the loan is worth). During the same period a year ago only 10 of 231 fell into those categories.

In the Fort Myers, Fla. area, a second-home market for the wealthy, Mike McMurray of McMurray and Nette and the VIP Realty Group, says he has seen a few foreclosed homes on the market compared to none last year. He's currently showing a 4,800 square-foot, $3.65 million home on Captiva Island, where foreclosures are usually very rare. The bank-owned home has five-bedrooms and access to 150-feet of Gulf coast beachfront.

"There are more we see coming down the pipeline," McMurray says.

Data shows that that may be the case around the county. The 90-day delinquency rate on home loans worth over a million dollars hit a high in February at 13.3 percent, higher than the overall rate of 8.6 percent, according to real estate data firm First American CoreLogic. Foreclosure proceedings generally begin to start after a homeowner has been at least 90 days late on a mortgage payment, experts say.

One difference in the high-end market is that lenders are willing to do more to head off a foreclosure by either renegotiating the loan or accepting a short-sale transaction, which is essentially a last-ditch effort.


“Lenders are far more likely to go the short sale route," says Andrew LePage, an analyst at real estate research firm DataQuick. "There’s a lot more money at stake, and maintenance can be high if a foreclosure just sits there.”

A $1.15 -million condominium in Chicago in the landmark Palmolive Building started was initially offered as a short sale but , after a buyer did not materialize, is now owned by the bank , says Janice Corley, founder of Sudler Sotheby's International Realty who’s currently listing it. The condo has lake views and a long list of luxury-building amenities including a steam room, doorman and gym.

The rise in foreclosures has one Las Vegas real estate agent flying prospective buyers into the city via private jet for free. Luxury Homes of Las Vegas and JetSuite Air teamed up to offer the complimentary trip for buyers flying from Los Angeles to view three foreclosed homes priced between $4.9 and $6.1 million.

Agent Ken Lowman said he gave three tours over a one-week period and hopes to expand the offer to buyers from other West Coast cities.

There's just too much competition, says Lowman. “It takes an innovative approach like this to get results."

Nine years to dig out of home foreclosure inventory

Rocky Vega reports on a staggering figure.  Based on today's current glut of foreclosed homes that reside in the coffers of lenders around the world, it will take a staggering 9 years to clear the CURRENT inventory!  This doesn’t take into account the additional homes that are pouring into the trough on a daily basis.

This will affect consumers and real estate professionals alike.  While the government has chased several acronyms....I mean housing programs..around, Mr. Vega predicts that they will have little lasting affect on this debacle.

One solution is to use any means to keep properties out of foreclosures.  Methods such as short sales and loan modifications (ones that actually stick rather than tease) are examples.



Nine years to dig out of home foreclosure inventory
It may take nine more years for banks to dig out of the current home foreclosure backlog.



By Rocky Vega, Guest blogger / April 30, 2010

At this point there are so many bank-owned foreclosed homes that it would take almost nine years to clear out the housing inventory. That time frame doesn’t even begin to take into consideration the additional homes that are likely to also enter the backlog while the current inventory of foreclosed homes gets cleared out.

“How much should we worry about a new leg down in the housing market? If the number of foreclosed homes piling up at banks is any indication, there’s ample reason for concern.

“As of March, banks had an inventory of about 1.1 million foreclosed homes, up 20% from a year earlier, according to estimates from LPS Applied Analytics. Another 4.8 million mortgage holders were at least 60 days behind on their payments or in the foreclosure process, meaning their homes were well on their way to the inventory pile. That “shadow inventory” was up 30% from a year earlier.

“Based on the rate at which banks have been selling those foreclosed homes over the past few months, all that inventory, real and shadow, would take 103 months to unload. That’s nearly nine years.”

As we already know, this predicament already includes the government programs at work to artificially improve the situation. For example, the Home Affordable Modification Program, or HAMP, was shown a recent report from the Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program to be operating because, “supporting home prices is an explicit policy goal of the Government.” When this support slows down, and stops altogether, the foreclosed inventory could end up taking a lot longer than nine years to clear out.

Foreclosure Lawyers Face New Heat In Florida

Amir Efrati reports on a growing trend among high volume foreclosure mills.  A few weeks ago I reported on the Law Offices of David Stern and how a representative back dated a notarized document.  The second largest foreclosure mill in Florida, the Florida Default Group, is being accused of similar deeds.

According to Mr. Efrati, the Florida Attorney Attorney’s General’s office has launched an investigation of the Florida Default Group.  According to the AG’s website, it’s looking at whether the firm is “fabricating and/or presenting false and misleading documents in foreclosure cases.” It added: “These documents have been presented in court before judges as actual assignments of mortgages and have later been shown to be legally inadequate and/or insufficient.”

At issue is their relationship with a company called Lender Processing Services (LPS).  Apparently this company is called upon by the Florida Default Group to produce documents that show ownership interest by banks in mortgages.  LPS is under investigation by the Justice Department.


Foreclosure Lawyers Face New Heat In Florida

By Amir Efrati

These are precarious times for lawyers in the business of filing foreclosure cases for banks. This is particularly true in one of the epicenters of the foreclosure crisis, Florida.

As we’ve noted before, the feds in Jacksonville recently started a criminal investigation of a company that is a top provider of the documentation used by banks in the foreclosure process. And a state-court judge ruled that a bank submitted a “fraudulent” document in support of its foreclosure case. That document was prepared by a local law firm.

For more Law Blog background on the foreclosure mess in our nation’s courts, this post will help.

The news today: the Florida Attorney General’s office said it has launched a civil investigation of Florida Default Law Group, based in Tampa, which is one of the largest so-called foreclosure-mill law firms in the state.

According to the AG’s website, it’s looking at whether the firm is “fabricating and/or presenting false and misleading documents in foreclosure cases.” It added: “These documents have been presented in court before judges as actual assignments of mortgages and have later been shown to be legally inadequate and/or insufficient.”

The issue: judges are increasingly running into situations in which banks are claiming ownership of properties they actually don’t own. Some of them end up chewing out the lawyers representing the banks.

The AG’s office said Florida Default Law Group appears to work closely with Lender Processing Services — the company we referenced earlier that is being investigated by the Justice Department.

LPS processes and sometimes produces documents needed by banks to prove they own the mortgages. LPS often works with local lawyers who litigate the foreclosure cases in court. Sometimes those same law firms produce documents that are required to prove ownership.

We’ve reached out to Florida Default Law Group and LPS and will let you know if we hear back.

Man Facing Foreclosure Tries To Tear Down Home With SUV

Stephanie Sklar from New Carlisle OH report on what NOT to do when facing foreclosure!  The article describes a man that took his SUV and proceeded to destroy his house!  I guess he thought felt that if he couldn’t have it, the bank wasn’t going to get it either!  

While this is an extreme example is does demonstrate that many sellers do.  They strip fixtures (items that are physically attached to the house) from homes prior to the bank foreclosing on them.  The issue is that this practice is against the law.

So if a friend or client mentions this tact, explain to them what you have learned today.

Man Facing Foreclosure Tries To Tear Down Home With SUV
BY Stephanie Sklar


A New Carlisle man facing foreclosure, is also facing criminal charges, according to WDTN 2.Clark County officials said that Steve Doak attempted to tear down his Firwood Drive home after he found out that the bank was foreclosing on the property.“As far as I’m concerned I am not done yet,” Doak said on Wednesday. “Not until it’s laying completely on the ground.”

Deputies were called to Doak’s home on Tuesday following neighbors reporting that he was driving an SUV through his yard, colliding into fences and walls.

Officials described the scene as very dangerous. They said there were neighbors outside and, also, Doak could have hit gas or electric lines, potentially causing an explosion.

Doak is now charged with a handful of criminal charges, including inducing panic, disorderly conduct, driving under suspension, and reckless operation.“His actions last night were completely out of control and unwarranted,” said Sheriff Gene Kelly.

“This was conduct that was not called for.”Sheriff Kelly said he will have additional patrols around Doak’s home, making sure that he does not do any extra damage.

The investigation is ongoing and officials said that additional charges could be filed in the future.You can view the news coverage on the story in the video above.

Foreclosure rates highest in 5 years

Alex Veiga from the Associated Press reports on a record number of foreclosures during the first 3 months of 2010.  RealtyTrac Inc. reported that the number of foreclosures increased by 35% during the first quarter of 2010.  Houses that were in pre foreclosure jumped by 16% as compared to the same period in 2009.

A quote from the article reads, “We’re finally seeing the banks start to process the inventory that has been in foreclosure, but delayed in processing,” Sharga said. “We expect the pace to accelerate as the year goes on.”  What they are referring to is the “shadow inventory” that the banks have been sitting on.  The article is also quoted, ”The Obama administration’s $75 billion foreclosure prevention program has only been able to help a small fraction of troubled homeowners.”

So, unfortunately, it appears that the bloodbath is going to continue.  Stay close to those that are, or will be, in need.

Foreclosure rates highest in 5 years

ALEX VEIGA
AP Real Estate Writer
Published: Friday, April 16, 2010 9:46 AM MST


LOS ANGELES — A record number of U.S. homes were lost to foreclosure in the first three months of this year, a sign banks are starting to wade through the backlog of troubled home loans at a faster pace, according to a new report.

RealtyTrac Inc. said Thursday that the number of U.S. homes taken over by banks jumped 35 percent in the first quarter from a year ago. In addition, households facing foreclosure grew 16 percent in the same period and 7 percent from the last three months of 2009.

More homes were taken over by banks and scheduled for a foreclosure sale than in any quarter going back to at least January 2005, when RealtyTrac began reporting the data, the firm said.

“We’re right now on pace to see more than 1 million bank repossessions this year,” said Rick Sharga, a RealtyTrac senior vice president.

Foreclosures began to ease last year as banks came under pressure from the Obama administration to modify home loans for troubled borrowers. In addition, some states enacted foreclosure moratoriums in hopes of giving homeowners behind in payments time to catch up. And in many cases, banks have had trouble coping with how to handle the glut of problem loans.

These factors have helped slow the pace of foreclosures, but now that trend appears to be reversing.

“We’re finally seeing the banks start to process the inventory that has been in foreclosure, but delayed in processing,” Sharga said. “We expect the pace to accelerate as the year goes on.”

In all, more than 900,000 households, or one in every 138 homes, received a foreclosure-related notice, RealtyTrac said. The firm based in Irvine, Calif., tracks notices for defaults, scheduled home auctions and home repossessions.

Homeowners continue to fall behind on payments because they’ve lost their job or seen their mortgage payment rise due to an interest-rate reset. Many are unable to refinance because they now owe more on their loan than their home is worth.

The Obama administration’s $75 billion foreclosure prevention program has only been able to help a small fraction of troubled homeowners.

About 231,000 homeowners have completed loan modifications as part of the Obama administration’s flagship foreclosure prevention program through March. That’s about 21 percent of the 1.2 million borrowers who began the program over the past year.

But another 158,000 homeowners who signed up have dropped out — either because they didn’t make payments or failed to return the necessary documents. That’s up from about 90,000 just a month earlier.

Last month, the administration expanded the program, launching a plan to reduce the amount some troubled borrowers owe on their home loans and give jobless homeowners a temporary break. But the details of those programs are expected to take months to work out.

The states with the highest foreclosure rates in the first quarter were Nevada, Arizona, Florida and California, with Nevada leading the pack, RealtyTrac said.

Rising home prices and speculation fueled a wave of home construction there during the housing boom. But now the state, particularly around the Las Vegas metropolitan area, is saddled with a glut of unsold homes.

Still, the number of homes in Nevada that received a foreclosure filing dropped 16 percent from the first quarter last year.

All told, one in every 33 homes in Nevada was facing foreclosure, more than four times the national average, RealtyTrac said.

Foreclosure filings rose on an annual and quarterly basis in Arizona, however.

One in every 49 homes there received a foreclosure-related notice during the quarter.

Florida, meanwhile, posted the third-highest foreclosure rate with one out of every 57 properties receiving a foreclosure filing.

California accounted for the biggest slice overall of homes facing foreclosure — roughly 23 percent of the nation’s total. One in every 62 properties received a foreclosure filing in the first quarter.

Homeowners face foreclosure after told to stop paying

Lita Epstein brings us an article that hits home.  On a very frequent basis, home owners are being told by lenders and/or servicing companies to “stop paying your mortgage or your loan modification won’t be considered.”  The problem is that very few loan modifications are getting approved.  Because very few get approved and because they take an inordinate amount of time to process, guess what is happening?  You guessed it, the sellers credit is getting wrecked due to the missed payments and the house moves closer and closer to foreclosure!

Lita states the obvious but I want to reinforce one of the points.  Nothing is guaranteed unless you have it in writing.  Remember, servicing companies get paid when they service something.  When the seller goes behind in their payments, guess what?  The servicing companies have to service the delinquent loan therefore they get paid!

The article points out what I have been an advocate of:  Get an attorney on your side.  Let the attorney do battle with the lenders and the servicing companies.  Any fee paid should be worth its weight in gold!

Homeowners face foreclosure after told to stop paying

Banks dragged their feet for months now. They told people that before they can get help they must stop paying their mortgages, so they can qualify for a loan modification. They eventually even sped up the process of giving people temporary modifications.

Now they're starting the final round: foreclosing on homes even after people were promised a modification. Foreclosure problems are reported in almost every state, but the most in depth report was done by The Chicago Reporter.Melissa Huelsman, who specializes in the areas of predatory lending/mortgage fraud lending litigation and foreclosure rescue scam litigation in Western Washington, told me that "unless you have something in writing from the bank that says they will not foreclose on your home," you can't believe the person on the telephone. Only a piece of paper promising you that the bank will not foreclose will protect you protect from foreclosure. When you start the modification process you do sign a piece of paper acknowledging that the foreclosure process can proceed if you fail to get a modification.

Huelsman thinks that if you're having trouble making payments your first call should be to an attorney who specializes in predatory lending or foreclosure rescue. She said there are attorneys taking cases at reduced fees or pro bono in almost every state. You can also make contact with a HUD housing counselor. She definitely does not think you should try to go it alone with the banks. The National Association of Consumer Advocates can help you locate a lawyer near you. Even if you started the modification process, it's not to late to seek help from a lawyer or HUD housing counselor.

Huelsman explained you need to work with an attorney in your state because each state has different foreclosure laws. In fact 35 states allow non-judicial foreclosure, so you won't even get your day in court. Foreclosure and mortgage modification have an "entire vocabulary all its own that people aren't used to. It's this lack of understanding that gets people into trouble," she explained. She also said if there is a second lien holder, they can obstruct the process.

She's had several run ins with Chase and its chairman and CEO Jamie Dimon. She thinks, "Mr. Dimon will spend the bank's money to fight rather than work out solutions." I found that to be true when Chase told me it won't consider principal reduction, even though all other major banks now do put that on the table.

Your state may even offer foreclosure mediation programs. You can find out more about the 26 programs now in operation working with the National Consumer Law Center (NCLC) at the Center's Web site.

In addition to the foreclosure mediation programs, NCLC, with its co-counsel, filed four class action suits on behalf of Massachusetts residents to challenge the failure of Wells Fargo Bank, Bank of America, J.P. Morgan Chase Bank and IndyMac Mortgage Servicers/OneWest Bank to honor their agreements with borrowers to modify mortgages and prevent foreclosures under the United States Treasury's Home Affordable Modification Program ("HAMP").

NCLC says, "These complaints are filed with the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts and assert claims for breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing and promissory estoppel under Massachusetts common law arising from the financial institution's alleged failure to keep its promises to modify eligible loans to prevent foreclosures against homeowners who have lived up to their end of the bargain as required by HAMP."

Clearly, you should not try to go it alone with the banks. They have lawyers on the payroll and you have little chance of being able to defend yourself. Don't wait until its too late and the bank already completed its foreclosure process while you patiently wait for an answer to your modification application.

Foreclosed? Here comes the tax man

This article from Les Christie is a very timely article.  A question that needs to be addressed BEFORE the short sale starts, is one of taxation.  If you are purchasing a short sale or if you are considering listing a short sale, you should require that the seller seek advice regarding the tax effects of a short sale.  They need to make an educated decision to pursue a short sale PRIOR to starting the process.

I would suggest that you click the link that takes you to the article.  Knowing a little will save you allot!

Foreclosed? Here comes the tax man

By Les Christie, staff writerApril 14, 2010: 5:24 PM ET


NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Did you lose your house to foreclosure this year? Did your lender forgive some of your mortgage debt because you sold it for less than it was worth? If so, you could be facing a big tax hit.

It is IRS policy to tax forgiven debt you are personally responsible for as if it is income. Say, for example, your credit card company settled a $10,000 debt for 50 cents on the dollar. You'd have a debt forgiveness of $5,000, which the IRS would count as income, just like your wages.

The same policy held true for most mortgage debt until 2007, when Congress passed the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Act. That ended the liability for many homeowners -- but not all.

In general, if you lose your home to foreclosure or short sale, where you sell your home for less than you owe, the IRS won't add insult to injury by counting the difference as income. At least until 2012.

There are four major exceptions to the rule:

1. You did a cash-out refinance and splurged.

Many homeowners took cash out when they refinanced their homes and used the extra dough to pay for new cars, boats or vacations. Say you did that and then got into trouble, losing the house through a foreclosure or short sale. Even if your lender waived the remaining debt, the IRS will treat as income the portion of the forgiven debt that you took out as cash and spent. Only the funds used to actually improve your home won't be taxed. Yes, even if you spent the money on paying off your student loans or credit cards.

The IRS' reasoning is that only the money spent on home improvement actually added to your home's value. And that, presumably, diminished the difference between what you owed on your mortgage and the value of your home when it was foreclosed.

Beware: Some lenders made refinancing offers contingent on homeowners paying off credit card debt, according to Kent Anderson, a Eugene, Ore.-based attorney and tax expert. If you took one of those deals, the refinance money will be reported to the IRS and you will owe taxes on it.

2. You have a home-equity line of credit.

During the boom years, many homeowners tapped soaring home equity to make all sorts of consumer purchases. But the same rules that apply to refinancings also apply to home-equity loans: The IRS will only forgive the tax liability if the loan money was spent improving your home. And, tax experts advise, you'll need to show receipts to prove you did.

3. You lost your vacation home or investment property.

So the market tanked and you lost your vacation home. Unfortunately, if you didn't use it as your primary residence for at least two of the previous five years, you're going to pay the tax man.

More common, however, may be the case of investment properties gone sour. During the housing boom, buying homes for investment purposes soared, accounting for 28% of all sales during 2005, according to the National Association of Realtors. (Vacation homes made up 12%.) And many of these purchases were made with little down payment.


When the bust hit, second home prices cratered. The median price paid for investment properties fell 43% to $105,000 in 2009, from $183,500 in 2005, according to NAR. For vacation homes, the median price paid dropped 17% to $169,000.

If an investor bought a property in 2005 at the median price and sold it in 2009, he could have run up $75,000 or so in forgiven debt. If the investor is in the 25% income tax bracket, that would add nearly $19,000 to their tax liability. Ouch!

4. You owned a multi-million-dollar home.

It may be hard for Americans struggling in this weak economy to sympathize with anyone wealthy enough, at one time, to afford a multi-million-dollar home. But owners losing one could be on the hook for a huge tax bill.

Only the first $2 million in forgiven debt will be voided under the relief act; all the overage is taxable as income.

So, say, for example, you're Scarlett Johansson. You paid $7 million for your Hollywood Hills villa in 2007. (With a 100% mortgage; this is hypothetical, remember.) But now, you have it on the market for $4.59 million.

Say you can't unload it, your movies tank and you have to a short sale. (Hey, it happened to Nicholas Cage; he went into foreclosure.) If you sell it for $4 million, leaving a $3 million balance, the IRS would forgive the first $2 million. But the remaining million? You better hope you have a good accountant and a lot of deductions.

The good news? Even if you fall under any of these four scenarios, you may have a way out, according to Anderson. "If the taxpayer was insolvent at the time of the foreclosure, the forgiven debt can be excluded for tax purposes," he said. "It can also be discharged in a bankruptcy and approved by court order."

And then there is California
Until last week, California still made you pay taxes on forgiven mortgage debt.

The state, which has endured some of the worst price declines and foreclosure rates in the nation, previously authorized relief, but only for the 2007 and 2008 tax years. But there were struggles trying to extend the benefit through 2009.

One attempt at passing an omnibus "conformity" bill resulted in a veto by Gov. Schwarzenegger for reasons having nothing to do with mortgage debt forgiveness. The governor objected to a different provision covering erroneous tax reporting by businesses.

But the problem was worked out and a new bill signed by Schwarzenegger just before the tax-filing deadline.


Why a short sale often takes so long
REAL ESTATE: It's better for some banks to 'delay and pray,' brokers say

Tom Bayles from the Sarasota Herald Tribune brings us an enlightening article describes the plethora of reasons as to, “Why a short sale often takes so long” to complete. He touches on the obvious ones which include:
• The banks are being flooded by short sale requests • The banks are under staffed • The existence of multiple liens on the house can drag a short sale out

He also touches on a few that are not so obvious:
• Loans are bundled with other loans and sold off as a portfolio that can include hundreds of individual notes. The ultimate decision to approve a short sale is now subjected to yet another layer which is the investor • Mix this in with Private Mortgage Insurance and you have another approval layer to deal with! • Another reason is better expressed through direct quotes from the article, “Some banks are urging federal regulators not to come in and force them to admit all of their problem loans, he said. "Most banks are trying to buy time. It is called the 'delay and pray strategy,'" Thomas said. "You delay valuating the house at market and pray the value will come back. If you mark it down for short sale and do that deal you have to take a hit to your capital." • Then there is “extend and pretend” This is where the bank will extend the term, lower the interest rate or grant a forbearance to the home owner. This strategy is designed to extend the inevitable so the bank doesn’t have to show the bad debt on their books. This happens frequently with higher end homes.

So now you know! Short sales can take a LONG time!

Why a short sale often takes so long
REAL ESTATE: It's better for some banks to 'delay and pray,' brokers say
HERALD-TRIBUNE ARCHIVE / 2010
By Tom Bayles


Nothing is more mercurial in today's Southwest Florida real estate scene than short sales.

No one can fully explain why it remains such a difficult task to complete one short sale -- the process by which a lender agrees to accept less than is owed on a home -- while another sails through. The only certainty as to why lenders do what they do: their bottom line.

Sometimes short sales bring more cash than foreclosures, and vice-versa. Which one it is depends on a host of factors, not the least of which is whether a lender has an agreement with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. for reimbursement of most losses on a bad loan like those sold short.

Multiple liens on a house and fat home-equity lines of credit that must be dealt with first are easy explanations for why a short sale languishes. Another is that lenders -- historically only handling a few cases each year -- are now overwhelmed with hundreds or more in a month, a logjam that builds upon itself.

Then there are the complexities of the post-boom world: loans that have been bundled with hundreds of others, then securitized and sold to an investor, and scores of Florida banks on the verge of insolvency that do not want to account for losses on a short sale.

Even with those hurdles, there are short sales that can take 90 days or less from offer to consummation.

Simply put, the decision an individual lender or investor group makes -- even if that is not to make a decision -- is laden with a convoluted mix of what-ifs, if-thens, no-ways and sure things.

"You never really know why," said Chip Waterman, a Coldwell Banker agent who has specialized in short sales and foreclosures for decades. "You just know that you are not getting a response."

'The logjam'

The Southwest Florida real estate community is keenly focused on short sales because distressed properties are the new normal.

Roughly 4,000 Florida Realtors have completed a short sale certification program since the National Association of Realtors launched it in October.

Nearly half of transactions in the region covered by the Sarasota Association of Realtors involve distressed properties. The proportion is about the same in Manatee.

Those high percentages of distressed sales is the single biggest factor holding back any significant gains in home prices, Realtors say. The enormous backlog of distressed properties also will govern any hope of a return to equilibrium in sales.

Mortgage lenders and servicers were caught unequipped to deal with the crush, said Mickey Ross of National Quick Sale, a Jacksonville-based company specializing in short sales.

"The biggest problem is the logjam," Ross said. "It's like you've got 100,000 people in a football stadium and nobody expected them all to go out the same door at the same time."

'Maniacal problem'

In the worst straits are those borrowers, usually through sub-prime loans, who have had their mortgage wrapped into an investment pool like those held by Citigroup and Bank of America, Ross said.

About 25 percent of boom-time mortgages are contained in such securities. Few of those securities have even basic guidelines for short sales, he said.

"They got into some pretty crazy financial gymnastics," Ross said. "If your loan is in one of those groups it could be very challenging to get a short sale approved."

The process of bundling notes and selling them to investors as a security was a boom-time staple, said Irv DeGraw, a banking professor at St. Petersburg College. AIG, Citigroup, Lehman Bros. and others backed, or insured, these so-called "credit-default swaps." When the housing market began tanking in 2006 and foreclosures began piling up, pay-outs to the investors skyrocketed.

Eventually the federal government stepped in with the multibillion-dollar bailout that shook America's consciousness.

"It was an absolutely maniacal problem," DeGraw said. "Nobody understood exactly what we were dealing with and then it exploded. Those taking the risk did not understand the amount of risk they were exposed to."

In a counter-intuitive move, many investment groups preferred a complete collapse of the security rather than agreeing to short sales.

"When the mortgages start to get into trouble an insurance policy kicks in and they are made whole," DeGraw said. "If they grant a short sale they are not made whole. It's one of these bizarre nightmare scenarios where people got too sophisticated."

'Delay and pray'

Thomas Budzyn, past president of the Mortgage Bankers Association of Southwest Florida, acknowledged the nightmare scenario that banks are facing with these bad loans.

"You are going to see more banks go out of business this year than in the last ten years combined," Budzyn said, noting that dozens of banks nationwide have failed so far this year.

In the midst of that crisis, it is somewhat understandable that getting a short sale done is often difficult.

"Some of the short sale offers I have seen, for example, are on a loan of $400,000, and the offer comes in at $125,000," Budzyn said. "Some of the banks would rather wait until a more reasonable offer comes in rather than take that much of a hit upfront."

Many are loath to approve a short sale because they stand on perilous footing -- one in four by the count of Ken Thomas, a Miami-based expert on Florida banking with a doctorate in economics.

"The banks in Florida are having a very difficult time because they make loans on real estate and we are ground zero for the collapse," Thomas said. "Instead of being hit by a Category 5 hurricane we've been hit with a Category 5 mortgage crisis."

Some banks are urging federal regulators not to come in and force them to admit all of their problem loans, he said.

"Most banks are trying to buy time. It is called the 'delay and pray strategy,'" Thomas said. "You delay valuating the house at market and pray the value will come back. If you mark it down for short sale and do that deal you have to take a hit to your capital."

Others employ what Thomas calls the "extend and pretend" strategy to keep regulators from noticing a delinquent mortgage, whether that be lengthening the term, lowering the interest rate or allowing a distressed homeowner to skip a few payments.

"Banks will say there is nothing wrong with that because we have one on the books for a million dollars and the market will come back in a year, so why we should we hurt our shareholders," Thomas said.

Banks are hoarding assets to avoid the fate that Thomas described, said Matt Augustyniak of Bradenton's Horizon Realty, Horizon Title and Horizon Financial.

"They have to show as much assets as possible to balance the books," Augustyniak said. "That is why these banks are dragging their feet on short sales."

FDIC cash

When Bank A takes over failed Banks B's assets, usually laden with risky mortgages, the FDIC often agrees to a "loss-share" agreement to minimize the acquiring bank's risk. The agreements cover anywhere from 80 percent to 95 percent of any losses on the bad loan portfolio.

In some cases, that prods lenders to agree to a short sale, especially if they can make more with the FDIC cash than the banks would if the house fell into foreclosure.

But the opposite can be true as well, with the lender actually making more from a foreclosure if the loan has a private mortgage insurance payout and can be resold at a good price.

The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, a Washington, D.C.-based think-tank, reports that the FDIC has taken over 203 failed banks since 2008, many with a loss-share agreement. Total deposits so far this year equaled $18 billion. In 2008, it was $389 billion, and at an estimated cost to the FDIC of $64.4 billion.

Seventy-eight percent of the existing loss-share agreements have no deductible, so the FDIC starts paying banks for their losses immediately.

For single-family mortgages, the loss-share agreement stays in effect for 10 years and covers losses when the loan is modified, foreclosed upon, when a second mortgage is charged off, or when the property is sold short.

"It has helped us sell a considerable amount of assets that we normally would have had to keep," said FDIC spokesman David Barr. "We audit the loss-share agreements to look that they are modifying the loans in a timely manner and not just opting for foreclosure or short sale. They have to choose the option that makes the most economic sense to the FDIC."

'Little incentive'

Despite the efforts of the Obama administration to speed and streamline the short-sale process, experts say banks do whatever will provide the best outcome for their bottom lines.

Charryl Youman, a sales agents with Prudential Florida Realty in Venice, has seen that firsthand.

What the banks are often doing by scuttling a short sale seems -- at first -- to make no sense, Youman said.

She had a buyer put in three offers over the course of 240 days on a two-bedroom, two-bath home selling short for $82,000. The buyer gave up.

"I never did hear from the bank," Youman said. "I did, however, hear from the foreclosure listing agent to take off my lockbox because the bank now owned the property. They sold it for $48,000."

But it turns out the lender may have played the game very well, she said.

The bank received mostly interest payments for three years before the buyer defaulted. It also received the payout from the private mortgage insurer, which was about $50,000, and then the proceeds of the foreclosure sale.

"The bank walked away with $98,000 -- and the three years of mortgage payments," Youman said. "The bank is not really losing much and sometimes can actually make money on these deals -- and so they can have little incentive to take a short sale offer."

Foreclosure firm's revenues jump to $260 million

Michael Sasso from the Tampa Tribune brings us a report regarding the law offices of David Stern. David Stern is Florida’s top law firm that represents banks and their investors who are foreclosing on peoples homes. When I say “top” I am not implying that they are the best; they are the largest. They take in 5000+ files per MONTH!

Based on the headlines, one would think that the article focuses on the financial exploits of David Stern. While this is certainly part of the article, a more interesting tid bit involves fraud. Apparently, a Pasco judge has accused the law firm of forging a notary stamp. The firm claims that “it was a simple mistake.” That’s laughable!

Why is this article significant to you? If you demand that a law firm represent the seller in your short sale transaction, don’t you think the law firm is going to be aware of these deeds of mistrust? As realtors, don’t rely on those silly little addendums that you received when you got your SDPE. A good attorney will blow these up in court. Do the right thing. Make sure the seller is represented by counsel.

Foreclosure firm's revenues jump to $260 million
By MICHAEL SASSO | The Tampa Tribune

TAMPA - The housing crisis has been very good for Florida's biggest processor of foreclosure lawsuits: Its revenues have skyrocketed to $260 million since the housing bust began.

In recent years, the Law Offices of David J. Stern, a Broward County-based foreclosure law firm, has become the largest filer of foreclosure suits in Florida. It also is the biggest filer in Hillsborough County, according to local court records.

Stern has taken an unusual step by separating his firm's lawyers from its back-office clerks, title insurance workers and other non-legal staff. Stern spun this back-office staff into a publicly traded company called DJSP Enterprises, which must file financial reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

While it's separate from Stern's law practice, Stern is still chairman and chief executive officer of DJSP Enterprises, and Stern's law practice relies on DJSP for everything that doesn't require a lawyer's hand.

This spin-off provides a glimpse into Stern's foreclosure empire.

According to DJSP Enterprises' recent annual financial report, the back-office operation had profits of about $44.6 million in 2009 on revenues of $260.3 million. That means the company's revenues have multiplied by a factor of six as the foreclosure crisis got worse.

In 2006, for example, the company reported profits of $8.6 million on revenues of $40.4 million, the company's report says.

The SEC report does not include financial information for Stern's separate law practice, which is not publicly traded and does not report its financial information.

DJSP's chief financial officer, Kumar Gursahaney, confirmed the revenue and profit figures in the company's SEC report. Stern could not be reached for comment.

In its financial report, DJSP says the booming number of foreclosures in Florida fueled its growth. So, too, did the huge backlog of homes that banks have taken back from delinquent homeowners. DJSP Enterprises helps lenders dispose of these homes.

Today, it processes more than 5,800 foreclosure files per month and more than 70,000 per year, its SEC filing says. As of Dec. 31, the company had 950 employees and offices in Plantation and Louisville, Ky. Also, DJSP uses outsourced workers in Manila, the Philippines.

DJSP's stock trades for $12.05 per share on the Nasdaq-GM exchange.

Still, even with its boom, companies such as DJSP and its chief customer, the Law Offices of David J. Stern, are getting more attention from judges lately.

Dubbed "foreclosure mills," these firms are known for a factory-like process where most of the legwork of filing lawsuits, researching titles and other duties are handled by clerks and paralegals rather than lawyers.

Some judges around Florida have criticized foreclosure mills for sloppy legal work and cutting corners.

Last week, The Wall Street Journal wrote about Lynn Tepper, a circuit court judge in Pasco County who accused the Law Offices of David J. Stern and a banking client of submitting a fraudulent document.

According to the article, the judge found Stern's office presented a mortgage document with a falsified notary stamp. In an interview with The Tampa Tribune Monday, Tepper said it appeared the document had been backdated in order to give a bank legal standing to foreclose on a home.

Forrest McSurdy, the in-house legal counsel for Stern's law practice, told the Tribune it was not intentional.

"Really it was a mistake by the notary and it was something that was not caught at the time of the hearing," McSurdy said.

Tepper believes otherwise.

"This isn't a clerical error," the judge said. "It wasn't a mistake. A notary isn't supposed to notarize that someone swore an instrument in front of them if, in fact, they didn't sign it in front of them."

Foreclosures Hit Rich and Famous

Craig Karmin and James Hagerty from the Wall Street Journal report on a trend that is spreading across the countryside. Houses with mortgages of $5M or more have seen a dramatic rise in mortgage defaults. People used to make money and could afford these gargantuan money pits but, with job cuts and a struggling economy these properties are going down the tubes, like their lower cost brethren. The article states, “In February alone, 352 homes nationwide in this category were scheduled for foreclosure auction, the final step before a bank acquisition. That is the largest monthly number of these so-called notices of sale since the financial crisis began. By comparison, in all of 2009, there were 1,312 such notices.” Astonishing numbers!

I think that this is the beginning of a trend. Why? Because wealthy people have the means to pump good money after bad to keep a house out of foreclosure. But, the money will eventually run out. Either that, or the home owner will make a business decision and engage in a strategic foreclosure. Either way, there may be opportunity heading your way.

Foreclosures Hit Rich and Famous
By CRAIG KARMIN And JAMES R. HAGERTY

The rich and famous now have something in common with hundreds of thousands of middle and lower-class Americans: The bank is about to take their homes.

Houses with loans of $5 million or more will likely see a sharp rise in foreclosures this year, according to a RealtyTrac study for The Wall Street Journal.

Just this week, a Tudor mansion in Bel-Air belonging to film star Nicolas Cage was in foreclosure auction and reverted to the lender. On Wednesday, Richard Fuscone, a former top Wall Street executive, declared personal bankruptcy, forestalling a foreclosure auction that had been scheduled this week on his 14-acre Westchester mansion. Last month a Manhattan condominium owned by Italian film producer Vittorio Cecchi Gori was sold in a foreclosure auction for $33.2 million.

In February alone, 352 homes nationwide in this category were scheduled for foreclosure auction, the final step before a bank acquisition. That is the largest monthly number of these so-called notices of sale since the financial crisis began. By comparison, in all of 2009, there were 1,312 such notices.

Economists say the super-wealthy are among the last to lose their homes in a mortgage crisis because they usually have high savings, better access to credit and other means for staving off foreclosure. But many of them work in financial services and other industries hit especially hard by the crisis, and have seen their wealth shrink in the market crash.

While the numbers are modest compared with foreclosures at other income levels, they suggest the possibility of a sudden spike in bank takeovers of the wealthiest Americans' property. Typically half the notices of sale result in homes being turned over to creditors, though the figure could be slightly lower for the richest Americans who have more financial options, according to Daren Blomquist at RealtyTrac.

Big borrowers are more likely to default than ordinary people, according to data from First American CoreLogic. Its loan database, reflecting more than 80% of the overall home-loan market, includes 1,700 loans with balances of $4 million or more. About 14.8% of those loans were 90 days or more overdue at the end of January, compared with 8.7% for all home loans tracked by First American. Sam Khater, a senior economist at First American, said the bigger borrowers may be more prone to stop making payments when they have lost all their home equity.

Mr. Fuscone, Merrill Lynch's one-time head of Latin America, put his mansion up for sale in November, asking $13.9 million. But he couldn't find a buyer.

The court had scheduled a foreclosure auction for Thursday for the 18,471-square-foot mansion—with two swimming pools, two elevators, six fireplaces, 11 bathrooms and a seven-car garage. The personal bankruptcy filed in U.S. Bankruptcy Court Wednesday temporarily freezes the foreclosure process.

Reached by phone, Mr. Fuscone declined to comment. Brokers and real estate tracking companies say that his home is one of the most expensive properties to face foreclosure proceedings yet.

The phenomenon is not limited to the New York area. Banks have taken over homes with loans of $5 million or more in Georgia, North Carolina and Colorado, RealtyTrac says.

Mr. Cage had tried to sell his 11,817-square-foot Bel-Air property for $35 million but failed to get any offers, said James Chalke, a real-estate agent who had the listing. At a foreclosure sale Wednesday, the property attracted no bids from investors and so was acquired by the foreclosing lender. Annett Wolf, a spokeswoman for Mr. Cage, said he had no comment.

A representative of Mr. Cecchi Gori, producer of more than 200 films including "Il Postino" and "Life is Beautiful," said his financial situation is improving.

In Florida's Miami-Dade County, the three largest foreclosure filings initiated against homes in the past six months involved a 4,655-square-foot home in Sunset Islands; a 8,443-square-foot house in Coral Gables; and a condo in Miami Beach, according to Peter Zalewski, a principal of Condo Vultures. All three had mortgages of $3.5 million to $4 million.

Mortgage defaults began to surge in late 2006, mostly among borrowers with subprime mortgages, those for people with weak credit records or high ratios of debt to income.

Over the next few years defaults spread rapidly to better-heeled borrowers, especially those who got loans without documenting their income. At the end of 2009, nearly eight million households, or 15% of those with mortgages, were behind on mortgage payments or in the foreclosure process.

Wealthy people have the means to stretch out the distress process, sometimes for years.

"It's very, very difficult for these people to believe they've had such a severe reversal of fortune," says Maggie Navarro, a real-estate agent in Pasadena, Calif.

Marc Carpenter, a San Diego-based foreclosure specialist, adds that while it's much harder for potential buyers to get loans, there are also fewer buyers who can pay for top-dollar properties. "The upper end is definitely a lagging indicator," he says.

In his bankruptcy filing, Mr. Fuscone provided a list of his debts, including ones to the Greenwich Country Day School, American Express, Mercedes-Benz, a local hardware store, a pet store, and Richards of Greenwich, a fine-clothing store.

"My background is in the financial-services industry and I have been personally devastated by the financial crisis which came to a head in March 2008," Mr. Fuscone said in his bankruptcy declaration. "I have been sued by Patriot National Bank" as part of a foreclosure action. "I currently have no income for the 30-day period" following his bankruptcy petition.

C.W. Kelsey, owner of Greenwich Hardware, was among the local merchants owed money by Mr. Fuscone, though he wouldn't say how much.

"Traditionally, the majority of our credit problems were contractors," he said. "Now there are people you'd never expect two or three years ago to have problems, who live in multimillion dollar homes."

—Nick Timiraos and Josh Barbanel contributed to this article.

TO HAFA OR NOT TO HAFA...THAT IS THE QUESTION!

Our government recently introduced yet another acronym....HAFA or Home Affordability Foreclosure Avoidance . People praise this as a new foreclosure prevention program when, in fact, it is a revision to HAMP or the Home Affordability Modification Program.

Jeff Watson, a short sale attorney, has put together a video blog which breaks down what HAFA is and what it is not. I will include a link to this video at the end of this commentary. According to Jeff, HAFA:
• The home owner decides whether they will participate in HAFA, not the lender
• Not all lenders have opted into the HAFA program
• The lender dictates what price the house is listed for, not the homeowner
• There is no guarantee from the government that the house will sell
• The homeowner must make mortgage payments on the 1st of every month until the house is sold that equals 31% of the gross monthly income of the mortgage holder
• The homeowner must be able to provide the new buyer with clear title. If there are junior liens (mortgages, HELOCs, HOA liens, contractor liens, IRS liens etc. etc.), the homeowner must either pay them in full or negotiate short payoffs with a complete settlement and satisfaction with no deficiency judgment.
• HAFA lets homeowners offer up to 3% of the unpaid principal balance on a lien as full settlement. SO if a homeowner owes $10,000 to a lien holder, they are allowed to offer the home owner a maximum of $300 to fully settle the debt!!
• The homeowner is allowed a maximum of $3000 to fully SETTLE all junior liens!
• The person that buys a HAFA house can’t resell the house for 90 days.
• HAFA gives the government the right to collect very sensitive information from the home owner (see video)
• The homeowner has 120 days to sell the house at the banks price. If they don’t sell it in 120 days they can apply for a longer sales period not to exceed 365 days.
• If they can’t sell the house in 365 days, the homeowner must agree to a deed in lieu if the short sale doesn’t work
• Regarding the infamous “10 days to respond”, this have very specific criteria, terms and conditions (see the video)

So you decide, if HAFA is beneficial to the home owner. The link to Jeff's video (titled Jeff Watson Breaks Down HAFA)


Above water?
The Washington Post brings us another article about yet another “refinement” to the Treasury Department's Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) program. The refinement involves forbearances for those that are recently unemployed. They also involve programs that will encourage lenders and loan servicing companies to write down principal balances in order to make a mortgage more affordable.

What these programs don’t address is our bulging unemployment rates. If the government spent as much time coming up with ways to lessen unemployment as they do in coming up with the latest acronym of the month, we might be some where! Wait until you read one of my next commentaries on HAFA...it’s laughable!

Above water?
Sunday, March 28, 2010

DESPITE RECENT, tentative signs of stabilization, the housing market remains fragile, and that translates into insecurity or outright hardship for millions of Americans. Twenty-four percent of all homeowners with mortgages are "underwater," meaning that they owe more on the residence than it is worth. For those borrowers who are unemployed, this situation is especially devastating: They can't tap equity to deal with expenses, and they often can't sell if a job offer requires them to move. In many cases, it's cheaper to walk away and let the bank foreclose than to keep up monthly payments.

The Obama administration, like the Bush administration before it, faces a clamor for relief. But if there were an easy solution to the foreclosure crisis, someone would have found it already. Loan modifications remain the best option, but targeting them to just the right population so as to avoid rewarding irresponsible behavior is a lot easier said than done. Small wonder that the administration's signature program, the Treasury Department's Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP), provided permanent payment relief to only 116,000 of 1.7 million potentially eligible cases through January.

On Friday, the administration announced a plan in response to those who say it must do more. Though billed in some headlines as a big expansion of mortgage relief, the plan is probably better thought of in the term used by the administration's own news release: a "refinement" of the existing program. The major changes involve more temporary loan forbearance for unemployed borrowers and incentives for creditors to offer write-downs of loan principal for underwater borrowers, instead of reductions in interest only. But these new steps still affect only the original HAMP target population of roughly 4 million households and -- crucially -- do not require principal write-downs as many of the administration's critics had urged. The Obama administration rightly resisted mandatory loan-balance reductions, which could have triggered unmeetable demands for similar breaks from other homeowners.

Taken together, the changes may indeed prevent a few more foreclosures than would have otherwise occurred. But the sad reality is that new foreclosures were far outpacing new loan modifications before the new plan came out, and probably will continue to do so until the wider economy begins to produce new jobs and stable, affordable mortgage rates. Economic weaknesses and government debt are what really ails the housing market, and for those ills, even the best-designed mortgage relief is a Band-Aid.

Foreclosure Properties May Take 5 Years To Be Absorbed Into Market

Cheryl Reams brings us an article about a subject that people have heard about but probably know little about. That subject is the “Shadow Market” of houses that will continue to depress out housing market for years to come.

Cheryl points out that , “The shadow inventory is composed of homes with delinquent loans, bank owned properties and foreclosures that are not yet accounted for under banking regulations. Accounting rules allow banks to keep foreclosed properties off their balance sheets until a property is resold. The record number of homes in the shadow inventory will pressure housing prices in the majority of markets, but should not depress prices as much as earlier levels, according to analysts.” She quotes that there are currently 6 million properties in this inventory.....and counting......foreclosures aren’t stopping anytime soon.

Ms Reams mentions that in some states, lenders are more than 30 (thirty!) months behind in processing properties that they have taken back in foreclosure proceedings. This number continues to build.

Foreclosure Properties May Take 5 Years To Be Absorbed Into Market
Written by: Cheryl Reams

Even switching into high gear, the nation’s banks have far to go to catch up with processing an unprecedented number of foreclosures. This could potentially delay recovery for another half decade according to Housing Predictor. Although the true extent of this shadow inventory is unclear, foreclosures have topped 7 million in just the last 3 years. See the following article from Housing Predictor for more on this.

The shadow inventory of homes and other residential properties exceeds 6 million, which will prolong the recovery of the U.S. housing market. The inventory of properties that have not yet been completed as foreclosures, but are under distress represent a growing inventory to be absorbed by the market.

The shadow inventory is composed of homes with delinquent loans, bank owned properties and foreclosures that are not yet accounted for under banking regulations. Accounting rules allow banks to keep foreclosed properties off their balance sheets until a property is resold. The record number of homes in the shadow inventory will pressure housing prices in the majority of markets, but should not depress prices as much as earlier levels, according to analysts.

Bank servicing companies have added staff and upgraded computer systems to handle the record volume of foreclosures. But they are running as much as 30-months behind in some areas of the country, particularly in hard hit California, Florida and Nevada. As a consequence, the time it takes to get foreclosed properties to the market and re-sell them has been delayed.

Banking analysts are reluctant to say how many foreclosures are in the pipeline due to public outcries over the foreclosure crisis. A high placed analyst with one of the nation’s largest lenders says it’s impossible to “really tell the magnitude of the problem.” However, a study of more than 100 markets by Housing Predictor heavily impacted by the housing crisis shows that there are at least six million residential properties in the shadow inventory.

The number of homes already seized by banks in foreclosure proceedings over the past three years has topped 7-million, according to Senate Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd (D-Conn.). A flood of foreclosures could act to further pressure housing prices, but since bankers are slowing the foreclosure process down the market will have more time to absorb the inventory. The efforts by bankers are an attempt to begin to stabilize home prices in a larger portion of the country.

Government programs started by the Obama administration have produced at least some amount of stability in especially hard hit markets in California, Florida and Nevada. Home sales have risen in most of Florida as prices decline. But the inventory of homes has tightened in many areas as a result of fewer foreclosures. California housing prices have been sliding as a result leading to a rise in bank seizures.

The housing market took a decade to recover from the downturn triggered by the Savings and Loan Crisis in 1988, and even longer after the housing bust that accompanied the Great Depression. However, prices had not increased as much as they have in the last thirty years during the 1930s. After the industrial revolution America went through massive changes, and it seems as though more sweeping changes are in store as the nation comes to grips with the digital age.

The artificial housing inflation triggered by derivatives traded on Wall Street that supplied the mortgage money coupled with the toxic new creative mortgages set the stage for the financial crisis.

Housing Predictor analysts project it will take at least another five years for the shadow inventory of foreclosed properties to be absorbed by the market. For home buyers there will be plenty of deals as the shadow inventory is marketed and sold off.

This article has been republished from Housing Predictor. You can also view this article at Housing Predictor, a real estate analysis and forecasting site.

As PBC foreclosure paperwork piles up, so does desperation

Kimberly Miller from the Palm Beach Post brings us an article regarding the mountains of paperwork that are deluging courthouse offices across the United States. Now, you may say that I am pointing out the obvious....which is partly true! But I found a little nugget that may help the real estate professionals out there help those that are seeking to buy properties “on the courthouse steps.”.

Buying properties at auction is the rage. As this article points out, the mountain of paperwork breeds chaos and confusion. One individual that is highlighted in the article paid cash for a house at auction and, 1 month later, is still waiting for the deed! As the old adage says, buyer beware!

As PBC foreclosure paperwork piles up, so does desperation
By KIMBERLY MILLER
Palm Beach Post Staff Writer


Don Cameron's March 8 win in a Palm Beach County home auction is stalled somewhere on the third floor of the courthouse in stacks of foreclosure filings piled several feet overhead.

He'd like to start fixing up the three-bedroom house, renovate the kitchen, maybe get it ready for a first-time home buyer hoping to cash in on the waning days of the $8,000 tax credit.

But nearly a month after his $74,570 purchase, which he is required to pay for in full by noon the next day, the massive backlog of foreclosures in the Palm Beach County Clerk and Comptroller's Office still has him waiting for the home's title.

Despite tripling the number of employees who handle foreclosures, and scanning a feverish 30,000 case pages into the computer every day, staff can't keep up with what amounted to about 2,500 foreclosures each month last year. (In all of 2005, there were 3,049 foreclosures in the county).

By statute, the clerk can't release a title for 10 days, but waiting up to 60 days to claim ownership is cutting into Cameron's profit margin and, some say, the economic recovery.

Getting foreclosures back on the market means paychecks for people who do renovations.

Buyers will purchase furniture and accessories.

Real estate and property taxes get paid.

"We can't do anything. We can't get our money back, we can't work on the property, we can't sell the property, we can't market the property," said Cameron, owner of real estate investment company Hi-Land Properties, a West Palm Beach subsidiary of We Buy Ugly Houses. "It's a domino effect."

This year, the Florida State Courts Administration is requesting $9.6 million from the state to hire more judges and speed the backlog of foreclosures through the system. The administration estimates there are about 500,000 foreclosure cases pending statewide, including 55,000 in Palm Beach County, and 13,750 in Martin and St. Lucie counties combined.

But even if the judges get their money, the cases could still get stuck in a processing logjam on the clerk's side.

And lawmakers are looking to cut $23 million statewide from county clerks' budgets, including a $2.6 million dig in Palm Beach County that could mean a loss of more than 100 clerk employees.

Palm Beach County Clerk and Comptroller Sharon Bock said that kind of staff reduction would mean fewer services in satellite offices, years-long waits for divorces and a continued quagmire for foreclosures.

"These foreclosures are already languishing," Bock said. "By allowing that, there is absolutely a capital loss, a loss in business, a loss in the market and a personal loss to the person stuck in limbo."

Bock estimates an average foreclosure case takes her office an overall 230 minutes to process from the time it is filed, sold on a new online auction system, and to closing.

Last year, when auctions were still live, processing the 30,227 foreclosures took about 118,470 hours of clerk work.

"It's very paperwork intensive," said Mark Broderick, director of Palm Beach County civil court services.

Martin and St. Lucie counties would see 10 percent cuts in their budgets for next year.

In Martin, that would be a reduction of about $360,000 and likely 14 positions, said Martin County Clerk of Courts Marsha Ewing.

While Ewing is still able to get titles on foreclosed properties bought at auction processed in 10 days, she said she's taken employees from other divisions to keep up with the filings.

Martin had 2,082 foreclosures in 2009, compared with 127 in 2005.

In St. Lucie County, proposed budget cuts would equal about $810,000.

"Cutting the budget would be disastrous for the public," said St. Lucie County Clerk of Courts Joseph Smith, whose office processed 8,324 foreclosures last year, compared with 485 in 2005. Smith has a staff of 23 working on foreclosures. Five years ago, it was half that.

The proposal to cut county clerks' budgets is based on a law passed last year requiring clerks to track their average cost per case and base their budgets on the unit cost.

But the clerks have been collecting the data for less than six months, and at least one senator said it was therefore inconclusive.

The plan will go to budget conference for debate.

Meanwhile, Cameron is waiting to get title on five foreclosures he's purchased this year through auction. "We want to help improve the community, put people to work and assist the recovery," Cameron said. "But we keep meeting stumbling blocks all the way through."

A Bold U.S. Plan to Help Struggling Homeowners

David Streitfeld from the New York Times reports on new government initiative that, on the face of it, sounds good. The new program (I’m not quite sure what acronym they’re going to throw at it!) will target those that are behind in payments but also those that own a property that is worth less than what is owed. The plan has a provision that allows for the principal reduction of the mortgage.

The article points out a very nagging fact, “None of these programs have the force of law, and lenders have often seen no good reason to participate.” This has always been the Achilles heel of the residential mortgage meltdown. The government can’t enforce the program. They can probably encourage the lenders that took TARP money to adopt it. The problem that the government will face is that the vast majority of mortgages are owned by investors and investors aren't bound to do anything with respect to the notes that they own.

One aspect of the new program that will effect home owners is, “(that the government) had previously planned to give homeowners that sell their homes rather than let them go into foreclosure a “relocation assistance” payment of $1,500. The plan announced on Friday increases that amount to $3,000.”

Whatever the final plan looks like, I hope it helps the homeowner.

A Bold U.S. Plan to Help Struggling Homeowners
By DAVID STREITFELD New York Times

Once again, the federal government is adding to its arsenal of programs for troubled homeowners, seeking to help those who urgently need it while neither angering nor creating perverse incentives for those who do not.

The new measures, announced by financial policy makers at the White House on Friday, are among the boldest to date. They are aimed not only at the seven million households that are behind on their mortgages but, in a significant expansion of aid that proved immediately controversial, the 11 million that simply owe more on their homes than they are worth.

Some of these people, if the government plan works, will emerge with a house whose payments they can afford and whose new mortgage reflects its market value. Unlike many previous modification recipients, they would presumably be less likely to re-default, helping to stabilize a housing market that remains queasy.

“We’re walking that delicate balance to make sure these solutions are sustainable and not temporary,” said David H. Stevens, commissioner of the Federal Housing Administration.

It is a balancing act in numerous ways. If the plan falls short — and some experts were skeptical on Friday — the Obama administration could find itself having to start over yet again in six months or a year.

“The housing market is the Vietnam War of the American financial system,” said Howard Glaser, a housing consultant. “The federal government is in so deep, they have to keep ramping up to find a way out.”

The latest programs, together with foreclosure assistance efforts already in place, are aimed at helping as many as four million embattled owners keep their houses. But the measures, which will take as long as six months to put into practice, might easily fall victim to some of the conflicting interests that have bedeviled efforts to date. None of these programs have the force of law, and lenders have often seen no good reason to participate.

To lubricate its efforts, the government plans to spread taxpayers’ money around liberally. For instance, it had previously planned to give homeowners that sell their homes rather than let them go into foreclosure a “relocation assistance” payment of $1,500. The plan announced on Friday increases that amount to $3,000.

All told, the new measures are expected to cost about $50 billion. The White House was careful to stress that the money will come from funds already set aside for housing programs in the Troubled Asset Relief Program. There will be “no additional commitment of taxpayer dollars,” Michael S. Barr, an assistantsecretary of the Treasury, said at the White House briefing.

Here is what the $50 billion is supposed to buy:

The simplest component of the plan involves assistance to unemployed homeowners. Mortgage companies will now be encouraged to reduce payments for at least three months and possibly six months while the homeowner pursues a new job.

To be eligible, borrowers must submit proof they are receiving unemployment insurance. The new payments will be 31 percent or less of their monthly income. The missing money will be tacked onto the loan’s principal.

A second and more complicated program is a requirement that mortgage servicers consider writing off a portion of a borrower’s loan to get it down to a more manageable level.

Borrowers in the government modification plan who owe more than 115 percent of the value of their home and are paying more than 31 percent of their monthly income toward the mortgage are eligible. The write-downs are to take three years, with the borrowers in essence being rewarded for making their payments on time.

The third major new program strays the farthest from the government’s previous approach. Borrowers who owe more on their homes than they are worth will get a chance to cut their debt — providing the investor or bank who owns the loan agrees.

Mr. Stevens of the F.H.A. said the program was “for responsible homeowners who through no fault of their own find themselves in a situation of negative equity.”

There is no official requirement that these homeowners be in distress, but it would probably make the investor more receptive to a deal. Whether homeowners will scheme to get into the program is one of the big uncertainties.

The investors will write down the loans to 97.75 percent of the appraised value of the property, at which point the F.H.A. will refinance them through new lenders. The F.H.A., which currently insures about six million homes, will insure the new loans as well.

If the homeowner has a second mortgage, as many do, the total value of the new mortgage can be as much as 115 percent of the value of the property. The F.H.A. will spend up to $14 billion to provide incentives to the banks that service the primary loan as well as the owners of the secondary loans. Some of the money will also provide additional insurance on the new loans.

Numerous parties will have to work together to make these deals fly. The primary loan might have been bundled into a pool and sold to investors during the housing boom. The investor must agree to cut the principal balance for a deal to work, and any bank holding a second mortgage on the property would have to go along, too.

The only incentive for the first lien holder is a quick exit from a loan that might ultimately default. Payments for second lien holders will be made on a sliding scale.

Early reaction to the refinance program among lending groups was less than enthusiastic.

“The magnitude of this program will likely be measured in the tens of thousands rather than the hundreds of thousands of borrowers,” said Tom Deutsch, executive director of the American Securitization Forum. Both banks and investors belong to the forum.

The Mortgage Bankers Association, which represents the banks that service the primary loans and own outright many of the secondary loans, warned that “each servicer will need to determine whether this is the best approach to help the individual borrower.”

The new proposals irked many people, who flooded online forums Friday. Some said those in trouble deserved their fate. Others asked why the government was propping up housing prices when many renters still could not afford to buy a house. And some wondered about the message these rescue plans were sending to those who resisted the housing bubble.

Dave Juliette, a software worker in Pittsburgh, is in the last group. He paid off his loan eight years ahead of schedule and now owns his house free and clear. “I’m a homeowner in a more genuine sense of the word than many of these people with mortgages,” Mr. Juliette said. “But I won’t be seeing a dime.”

Cuyahoga County sheriff to bar appraisers from buying foreclosures
The Columbus Dispatch brings us a short but very interesting piece. The sheriff in Cleveland wants to ban any appraiser from buying houses that are sold at public foreclosure auctions. Sheriff Reid sees a potential conflict of interest. I would agree with his position but would suggest that he (and those throughout our country) take it a step further.

First, I agree with his position because there is a definite conflict of interest. My first assumption is that the appraiser is performing an appraisal for a bank on a pre foreclosure property. If an appraiser plans on purchasing a specific property that he or she is appraising for a bank his or her inclination will be to appraise it very high? Why you might ask? Because a bank uses this value to determine market value and to evaluate offers. If the value that they have been given by a rogue appraiser is too high, the banks inclination is to foreclose and auction it off.

I think they should take it a step further. I think they should ban real estate agents who perform brokers price opinions from re listing the same properties for the banks. These folks are commonly known as REO agents or Real Estate Owned Agents. There is the same conflict of interest. If an agent knows that they or their brokerage has the potential of securing a bank owned listing if the the property that they are evaluating goes into foreclosure, the real estate agents inclination will be to value the property above market. This action could produce the same outcome as a high appraisal.

SO if your involved in a short sale or preforeclosure and you find that the bank is sending out a REO agent, be ready to appeal the BPO if it doesn’t represent the just market value for the property.

Cuyahoga County sheriff to bar appraisers from buying foreclosures

CLEVELAND (AP) - The sheriff in Cleveland plans to bar the 36 appraisers working for his office from buying homes that have gone through public foreclosure.

The move by Cuyahoga County Sheriff Bob Reid is meant to avoid any conflict of interest in setting the value of foreclosed homes. The sheriff's office has overseen nearly 33,000 auctions of foreclosed homes in the past five years.

Under Reid's predecessor, appraisers were an important source of political fundraising for the sheriff's office.

Wine Is Not an Immunity to Foreclosure

Sajid Farooq from NBC writes an article that interests us. There are 10 wineries in Napa Valley that are in danger of being foreclosed upon. While Randy and I enjoy an occasional glass of good wine, we were both amazed at this data. In fact the article goes on to say that over 250 vintners haven't seen economic times in 20 years. If anyone hears of any Napa or Sonoma Wineries that are overleveraged and in danger of default, call me.

Wine Is Not an Immunity to Foreclosure
By SAJID FAROOQ

Cheap wine prices soon may not be the only thorn in Napa Valley's vine. A recent survey suggests decreased land value may be an aging problem in wine country.

Bloomberg News is reporting that as many as 10 Napa Valley wineries and vineyards will likely be sold in distressed sales or worse, fall to foreclosures over the next two years.

The findings are based on a study by the Silicon Valley Bank, which says Napa Valley land values have dropped 15 percent since 2007. About 7 percent of the survey respondents said their finances are "very weak" or on "life support." Still no vineyards have fallen into foreclosure yet.

The bank has more than 250 vintners as clients who are calling their current economic situation the worst they have seen in 20 years. That's bad news for the new kids on the block.

Bill Stevens, the manager of the Silicon Valley Bank's wine division, says "anybody who was late to the party won’t have staying power.”

Giant bank, giant struggle in providing mortgage help
Mary Shanklin from the Orlando Sentinel reports on what many of you already know. Bank of America has a terrible reputation for approving short sales and permanent loan modifications. This is partially due to the systems that they have in place. B of A’s acquisition of Countrywide has also contributed to the poor performance.

Passages from the article include, "Realtors that I work with, if they hear Bank of America, they won't even show the property," said David Pruett, a broker for D.A. Pruett Properties.

The chairman of the Orlando Regional Realtor Association, Kathleen Gallagher McIver, said recently that Bank of America has the worst record for expediting short sales, "and there's not anyone out there who will tell you otherwise."

Another known fact about Bank of America and Countrywide is that if an offer is presented and later cancelled and then a subsequent offer is presented, the ENTIRE negotiation process starts ALL OVER AGAIN! SO what does this mean? The realtors that are reading this are at a major disadvantage. Based on B of A/Countrywides history, the likelihood of your first buyer walking away from their offer prior to their offer being approved is VERY high. This means that you will waste a TREMENDOUS amount of time when processing your own short sales (my contention is that you will ALWAYS waste your time processing any of your own short sales). When we place an offer on a property, our offers will stay in place until negotiations have reached some sort of conclusion.

While B of A presents challenges, we embrace these opportunities and opportunities presented with other lien holders attached. If you have any questions, call me!

Giant bank, giant struggle in providing mortgage help
Foreclosure-assistance pipeline clogged for Bank of America, other lenders
By Mary Shanklin, Orlando Sentinel


Two years after swallowing the troubled mortgage giant Countrywide Financial, Bank of America trails other major U.S. lenders in resolving troubled home loans through short sales or modified loan terms.

The lender, one of the nation's biggest banks, holds more than a million mortgages that are months behind on their payments — twice as many defaulting home loans as any other lender in the country. But it has given permanent mortgage modifications to only about 1 percent of those borrowers — one of the lowest rates among lenders nationally, according to a report released last month on the federal government's Home Affordable Modification Program.

The issue is key in Metropolitan Orlando, which has the nation's 11th-highest rate of mortgage modifications, with 18,000 homeowners in trial modifications and 2,468 in permanent ones, the report stated.

Loan modifications aren't the only way of out a foreclosure. In January, about a quarter of all Orlando-area home closings were short sales, which occur when the lender allows a homeowner to sell the property for less than what's owed on the mortgage.

But when it comes to short sales, Bank of America also lags other lenders, real-estate agents say, by taking too long to respond to offers.

"Realtors that I work with, if they hear Bank of America, they won't even show the property," said David Pruett, a broker for D.A. Pruett Properties.

The chairman of the Orlando Regional Realtor Association, Kathleen Gallagher McIver, said recently that Bank of America has the worst record for expediting short sales, "and there's not anyone out there who will tell you otherwise."

Bank of America acknowledges it needs help with its short sales.

"We clearly recognize the need to improve the short-sale process for both our customers and the real-estate professionals who are critical to a successful transaction," said Jumana Bauwen, a bank spokeswoman.

The company said it has updated its training, enhanced its technology and established a short-sale team to help customers and real-estate agents navigate the process. It is piloting a short-sale program for owners who don't qualify for new mortgage terms. And it has established a 24-hour phone line so agents, buyers and sellers can track the status of their short sales.

Bank of America is not alone in its struggles to deal with the avalanche of defaulting home mortgages, according to the February modification report by the U.S. Treasury Department and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

Wachovia Corp., now owned by Wells Fargo & Co., has approved permanently modified terms for fewer than 1 percent of its 86,461 defaulting mortgage customers. American Home Mortgage Servicing Inc. has a similar track record with the 127,521 mortgages headed toward foreclosure that it holds. Among the nation's largest lenders, GMAC Mortgage Inc. had the best rate: 17 percent of its 65,751 defaulting home loans have been permanently modified.

Bank of America, which inherited much of its mortgage portfolio from Countrywide, says part of the problem is that many homeowners have not been diligent about submitting the documents needed to convert a trial mortgage modification into a permanent one.

Clermont resident George Simmons said he is now totally frustrated, having tried for more than a year to get Bank of America to convert a series of trial modifications into something permanent.

"Let's see, the last correspondence I had from them said they didn't have my income-tax return and my Social Security records," Simmons said. "I sent it to them so many times. I've got my fax receipts and my certified postal receipts. They just keep asking for the same paperwork over and over and over again."

Overall, about a fifth of Bank of America's defaulting-mortgage customers have received temporary, three-month trial modifications. To address the huge volume of troubled loans needing permanent solutions, the company has hired about 15,000 staffers. Workers knock on doors and call homeowners with trial modifications at least 10 times before the temporary terms expire in three months.

At one point, Bauwen said, Bank of America was behind in getting homeowners into trial loan modifications. But it has ramped up those efforts, she said, and many of those trials will be converted into permanent modifications.

More importantly, Bauwen added, the company is not ramping up its foreclosure efforts unnecessarily.

Arizona Leads the Way in Combating Foreclosure

Dean Baker from Truthout reports on an innovative bill that is being considered by Arizona. They want to pass a law that allows home owners to stay in their homes for one year after they have been foreclosed upon!

The bill limits this benefit to low and moderate income home owners. The bill also has a provision that allows the homeowners to rent from the bank on a month to month basis.

In my opinion the bill is sending a message to the lenders and their investors.....do everything you can to avoid foreclosure (i.e. approve a loan modification, a short sale, etc) or we (Arizona) will hold you hostage for a long long time. Frankly, I hope it passes!

Arizona Leads the Way in Combating Foreclosure
by: Dean Baker

As the Obama administration works up its 12,487th plan for keeping underwater homeowners in their homes, Arizona's legislation may have the courage and good sense to do the obvious: let foreclosed homeowners stay in their home as renters. A bill was just introduced in legislature that would allow homeowners in houses that sell for less than the median price to remain in their home as renters for at least one year following foreclosure.

With this simple gesture the Arizona legislature could do more for the nation's underwater homeowners than all the brilliant DC policy wonks have managed to accomplish in the last three years with all their billions of dollars. The legislation would give low and moderate-income homeowners security in their homes. It doesn't make them jump through hoops and prove to bureaucrats that they were worthy. It doesn't require them genuflect before loans servicers or bankers.

This legislation would give homeowners the right to stay in their home. And bingo, every low and moderate-income homeowner in the state would know that the bank could not just throw them out on the street. If this passes the banks may also think more seriously about loan modifications, since they couldn't just throw a foreclosed homeowner out on the street. The proposals doesn't cost the taxpayers any money. It also doesn't require any government bureaucracy. It's easy to see why it's a non-starter in Washington.

Fortunately, this one doesn't have to go through Washington. Every state in the country could follow the lead of Arizona. If legislators are tired of seeing people thrown out on the street, if they are tired of seeing foreclosed homes sit vacant and ruin whole neighborhoods, they can just grant underwater homeowners in their state the same rights as are being proposed for homeowners in Arizona.

Of course, this will mean bucking the banks. The banks don't see any reason that they should suffer just because they made bad loans in the middle of the housing bubble. The banks feel it is especially unjust that they should suffer since they have spent so much money buying politicians who will gladly funnel them taxpayer dollars for mortgage modifications under the guise of "helping homeowners." The whole point is to keep the homeowners paying money as much as possible as long as possible.

Who cares that underwater homeowners will never get any equity in their homes and that they are paying far more on their mortgage than they would ever pay in rent? The interests of the banks can't be held hostage to the welfare of homeowners.

So what if homeowners' debt burdens are dragging down the economy? It is not the banks' problem if mortgage payments leave consumers little money to spend in other areas. Bank profits are more important than sustaining the recovery.

That may be the view in Washington, but this view may not win out in Arizona. At last a group of legislators are prepared to take serious action to address the problems created by the collapse of the housing bubble instead o just repeating silly platitudes about the importance of homeownership.

Of course, other legislatures can and should go beyond the provisions of the Arizona measure. This act ensures homeowners the right to stay in their home for one year with the possibility of staying longer on a month-to-month basis. It would be desirable to provide greater housing security to foreclosed homeowners by extending the right to rent over a longer period such as 5-10 years. This would give foreclosed homeowners enough time to get back on their feet, to let their kids finish their school and in other ways get their life in order. After all, it wasn't that fault that Alan Greenspan and Ben Bernanke were too dumb to recognize the largest housing bubble in the history of the world.

But the bill before the Arizona legislature would be a great step forward. Washington may be controlled by people who can only think of ways to help banks, but the Arizona action shows that at least in some states people can get elected who have other priorities. We should hope that this will be the first in a series of state level measures designed to really help homeowners.

Lenders starting to run after 'walkaway' homeowners

Charles Feldman brings us a very good article regarding “walkaways.” There is a growing group of people that simply walk away from their homes because they are worth less than what is owed. Recently, this trend has caught the eye of bankers and they are not rolling over.

Lenders are securing the deficiency judgments by garnishing wages, stripping banks accounts and even securing IRS tax refunds. It’s not a free lunch. People must understand that simply walking away can impact them in a very negative fashion. Banks are pulling the credit of homeowners and checking to see if they are late on other debt payments (cars, credit cards etc). If they are not late on other payments, banks have been aggressively pursuing judgments.

An interesting passage from the article is, “As one Web site that helps provide homeowners with foreclosure news points out, the extent that a lender can go after you when you walk away from your home depends, to some degree, on the laws of the state you reside in. So it is important you check this out if you are giving serious thought to walking away from your underwater property. Complicating matters, the site also points out, is whether you have a second mortgage on the property. You need to take all that into your calculations when it comes to any future liability.” What does this tell you? Seek an attorney!

Lenders starting to run after 'walkaway' homeowners

It's a variation of "you can run, but you can't hide," in the case of underwater homeowners (those whose homes are now worth less than the remaining mortgage). In increasing numbers, according to reports, people are simply walking away from their homes. Now banks and other lending institutions are starting to run after them.

According to the Detroit Free Press, more and more lenders are either hiring collection agencies or "getting deficiency judgments -- court orders that allow banks to collect on mortgage balances."

And that is bad news for the walkaway ex-homeowner. Such a court order would allow the bank to do everything from garnishing wages to grabbing any tax refund he might be expecting.

It gets worse, too.

If you walk away from your home, you are still responsible for taxes on it. At the moment, many banks are actually paying off that bill because they want to head off a tax foreclosure situation. But once they catch their breath, guess who the lenders will go after to recoup those payments made on your behalf?

Yep. You.

Florida real estate attorney Larry Tolchinsky tells CNN.com: "Banks are pulling credit reports to see if it's a strategic default. If you're behind on all your other payments, you're okay. But if you're not, they'll come after you."

As one Web site that helps provide homeowners with foreclosure news points out, the extent that a lender can go after you when you walk away from your home depends, to some degree, on the laws of the state you reside in. So it is important you check this out if you are giving serious thought to walking away from your underwater property. Complicating matters, the site also points out, is whether you have a second mortgage on the property. You need to take all that into your calculations when it comes to any future liability.

None of this, of course, deals with the larger ethical question: Whether, under any circumstances, it is okay to walk away from a property you still owe money to lenders on? That debate has been intensifying in recent months as more distressed homeowners are taking that option.

But if you have settled this ethical issue in your own mind and with your family, and have decided to go ahead and toss those keys back to the bank, you really do need to be keenly aware that the banks are apparently starting to fight back and your money concerns may not come to an end just because you closed that door and walked away.

Charles Feldman is a journalist, media consultant and co-author of the book, "No Time To Think-The Menace of Media Speed and the 24-hour News Cycle." He has written about real estate related issues for several years

Obama unveils mortgage plan to help California, 4 other states

Peter Nicholas and Ashley Powers report on the governments latest flavor of the month. President Obama announced a $1.5B (yes that’s right BILLION) program designed to help just 5 states. While I live and do business in one of these states (Florida) and do business in two others (California and Arizona), it is my opinion that this is yet another band aid.

The article points out that, “The money will go toward homeowners who have lost their jobs, owe more than their houses are worth or cannot afford to make monthly payments.” While I applaud helping homeowners that are in need, I believe that the money will simply delay the inevitable.

Why not spend money to streamline the short sale process so more families can be saved from the trauma of a foreclosure?

Obama unveils mortgage plan to help California, 4 other states
In Nevada, the president touts a $1.5-billion program designed to help people in danger of foreclosure. He also talks up beleaguered Sen. Harry Reid.
By Peter Nicholas and Ashley Powers


Reporting from Henderson, Nev. - Standing in the heart of the nation's hard-hit foreclosure country, President Obama on Friday rolled out a $1.5-billion mortgage program meant for a handful of states, including California and Nevada, that have endured waves of home foreclosures during the recession.

The president also used the moment to give a needed boost to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's reelection chances, crediting him with helping stave off a depression over the last year

Obama spoke to 1,800 people at a town hall-style event as part of a two-day Western swing in which he raised money for Democrats and campaigned for two senators facing tough campaigns: Reid and Michael Bennet of Colorado.

The announcement of new steps to prevent home foreclosures was aimed especially at Nevada, which has ranked first in foreclosures for 37 consecutive months. Although the administration has already put forward programs to reduce monthly mortgage payments, officials acknowledged that more relief is needed.

Under the new policy, $1.5 billion that had been reserved for the bank bailout will be rerouted to five states that have seen housing prices drop more than 20% since 2006: Nevada, California, Michigan, Florida and Arizona.

The money will go toward homeowners who have lost their jobs, owe more than their houses are worth or cannot afford to make monthly payments.

After announcing the program, Obama got a standing ovation.

"Government alone can't solve this problem," the president said. "And it shouldn't. But government can make a difference. It can't stop every foreclosure. . . . But what we can do is help families who have done everything right stay in their homes whenever possible."

Polls indicate voters are unnerved by the economy and impatient with incumbents, and both Reid and the president seemed intent on showing they grasp the public mood.

Reid got straight to the point in introducing Obama. Speaking in hushed tones, he opened with: "Mr. President, people in Nevada are really hurting. We have people out of work, people that are afraid they're going to lose their jobs."

Nevada's 13% unemployment rate is the nation's second-highest, behind Michigan.

Obama portrayed Reid as a vital partner in passing recovery programs that averted an even worse economic downturn.

Like himself, he said, Reid has been scarred by the prolonged and bruising debate over healthcare. Obama said his political advisors warned him last year not to attempt a healthcare overhaul. He said he ultimately decided it was worth it, but that his advisors had a point.

"The people who were giving me advice at the beginning of the year were right," Obama said. "Healthcare has been knocking me around pretty good. It's been knocking Harry Reid around pretty good."

Rescuing Reid won't be easy. A January poll for the Las Vegas Review-Journal newspaper showed that more than half the voters surveyed disliked Reid.

Championing Obama's call to revamp healthcare has hurt Reid at home, the survey showed. More than half the people polled said they opposed the plan, even though more than 450,000 state residents are uninsured.

Obama said Reid shared credit for the foreclosure plan unveiled Friday and other economic programs.

"I can personally attest that Harry Reid is one of the toughest people I know. He does not give up," Obama said. "He knows what he cares about. He knows what he believes in, and he's willing to fight for it."

The president also sought to rally support for his healthcare overhaul. Next week he will meet with congressional leaders from both parties in a bid to revive the plan, which has been stalled in Congress.

Obama said he was open to Republican ideas, but he made it plain that he would arrive at the meeting with a plan reflecting Democratic priorities. That approach doesn't sit well with Republicans, who say they would prefer to start from scratch.

"We're going to move forward the Democratic proposal," Obama said. "We hope the Republicans have one too. And we'll sit down and let's hammer it out. We'll go section by section."

He urged Americans to watch the session, which will be televised. "Pay attention to what this debate is about," he said.

By visiting Nevada, the president also hoped to make amends for past statements suggesting that Las Vegas was a place budget-conscious Americans should avoid.

This month, Obama angered Nevada officials, Reid included, when he told a New Hampshire audience: "When times are tough, you tighten your belts. . . . You don't blow a bunch of cash in Vegas when you're trying to save for college."

Las Vegas Mayor Oscar Goodman told reporters this week that he wouldn't meet with Obama unless he stopped "derogatory" references to his city.

One man at the town hall meeting gave Obama a chance to patch things up. He introduced himself by saying he was from Arkansas. When the president asked why he was in town, the man replied, "Everybody comes to Vegas."

Obama said: "That's what I'm talking about! There you go. Everybody comes to Vegas! . . . Here's my question: 'Have you spent some money here in Vegas?'"

"Yes, sir," the man said.

"That's good. We like to see that," Obama said.

Reinforcing the message, he spoke later in the day to the Las Vegas Chamber of Commerce and told the audience: "Before I go any further, let me set the record straight. I love Vegas! Always have."

Foreclosure stresses take human toll

In this day and age the news is filled with stats and stories about foreclosures, short sales, loan modifications etc. etc. What many fail to see is the toll foreclosures take on the human race. They take an emotional toll on those that are involved often causing the break up of family and friends. The most devastating impact can be on the children.

If you are involved, in any way, with a property that is involved with a distressed sale, be aware of the human toll.....be aware of the children.

Foreclosure stresses take human toll
By Renae Merle
The Washington Post


The stress of a foreclosure can disrupt marriages and produce behavioral changes in children, according to a recent study.

The study is based on interviews with 25 Latino families by the National Council of La Raza and the Center for Community Capital at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

"People losing their homes is more than losing a physical space, bricks and mortar," said Janis Bowdler, deputy director of Wealth-Building Policy Project at the National Council of La Raza.

"We have been so focused on the short-term impact of the financial crisis, the policy solutions, the physical loss of the house, that we don't always consider the larger picture."

The families, who were from Texas, Michigan, Florida, Georgia and California, said that after the foreclosure, they incurred significant financial losses, on average about $89,000.

Of the parents interviewed, about half reported problems in their relationship, and more than a third were considering divorce or separation.

Thirteen families reported that after they lost their home, their children had academic or minor behavioral problems in school. Many parents reported more conflicts with their children.

"Parents often perceived their children being withdrawn and having trouble making new friends," the study said.

The study is the latest to link foreclosure and mental-health issues, and Bowdler said she hoped it would spur more research.

Last year, researchers at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine found 47 percent of the homeowners going through foreclosure showed symptoms of depression, with 37 percent exhibiting signs of major depression.

Moody's Economy.com has forecast that more than 1.9 million homeowners will lose their homes to foreclosure this year.

Short sales grow as a cheaper alternative to foreclosure
Banks' resistance to the tricky transactions is softening as the number of distressed properties increases.

Alejandro Lazo from the LA Times reports on a trend that should help everyone. Lenders are finally getting clued into the fact that short sales can be a better alternative to foreclosures. Mr. Lazo reports that, “Short sales approved by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which own 57% of U.S. mortgages, nearly quadrupled in the first nine months of 2009 compared with the same period in 2008. At the nation's largest mortgage servicers, short sales soared 165% to 74,513 in the first nine months of 2009 from the year-earlier period.” A study showed that banks (more specifically the investors that own the loans) absorb an average of a 45% loss when they foreclose when compared to a 33% loss when they approve a short sale.

The story chronicles a couples adventure thru the short sale maze. They were approved for a trial loan modification by Bank of America, but the payments were still unaffordable. This isn’t surprising. Last year, LESS than 4% of all PERMANENT loan modifications were approved. Of these, the consensus is that 60+% of these slide back into delinquency.

The article points out that junior lien holders have presented major problems with both loan modifications and short sales. Mr. Lazo is quoted, “Of the 1.2 million U.S. properties in foreclosure, about 34%, or 403,670, have a second loan, according to RealtyTrac. In California, with 280,023 properties in foreclosure, about 46%, or 128,800, have a second loan.” If you don’t have a solution for second mortgages when going into a short sale, why bother. We have a solution.

The article closes with the following passage, “She is facing foreclosure on a Glendora town house that she bought as an investment property. Quinn said she has tried to arrange a short sale four times through her lenders, Bank of America and JPMorgan. Buyers, tired of waiting months for an answer from the banks, walked away on three occasions, and the banks rejected an offer from a fourth as too low, she said. She lined up a fifth buyer, she said, but BofA balked.”

Sound familiar? Buyer after buyer after buyer walks. This wastes your time, the banks time but more importantly the sellers time. Inevitably, it will drive the house into foreclosure. Why waste your time with this kind of process when you don’t have to? Call me.

Short sales grow as a cheaper alternative to foreclosure
Banks' resistance to the tricky transactions is softening as the number of distressed properties increases.

Nineteen months ago, the recession took Bob Walker's job. Then, creditors lined up to take the three-bedroom hilltop home that the computer consultant shared with his wife, Stephanie, a playwright still looking for her first break.

Avoiding the stigma and financial fallout of foreclosure became an obsession for the Walkers. They talked to the banks, found multiple jobs, put their Silver Lake house on the market and tried to stitch together a plan to repay their debts. Finally, they turned to a short sale, chronicled in a popular blog: Love in the Time of Foreclosure.

"We really thought that, worst-case scenario, we will sell the house and break even," Stephanie Walker said. "But it didn't work. We went into great losses."

In a short sale the lender lets a homeowner unload a house for less than what is owed on the mortgage. The transaction recognizes that the home isn't worth what the owner paid for it after more than two years of falling real estate values.

Such deals are appealing to struggling homeowners because they escape weighty house debts -- but they don't get away unscathed. Their credit scores will be damaged, perhaps less severely than in foreclosure, but still badly enough to limit for years their ability to borrow money. There may be tax consequences. And any money invested through down payments and renovations will be lost.

Lenders, which can withhold approval of a short sale if they don't like the price, have resisted such sales because they are difficult to execute, particularly when multiple creditors and other parties are involved. And short sales lock in losses that might be reduced if the sale is delayed until the market improves.

But that resistance is softening. With more Americans losing jobs and missing mortgage payments, banks and investors increasingly are agreeing to short sales as a less costly alternative to foreclosure.

Short sales approved by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which own 57% of U.S. mortgages, nearly quadrupled in the first nine months of 2009 compared with the same period in 2008. At the nation's largest mortgage servicers, short sales soared 165% to 74,513 in the first nine months of 2009 from the year-earlier period.

Short sales are still few compared with foreclosures, but policymakers are looking at such sales to shrink the number of bank-owned homes on the market.

Late last year, the Obama administration added incentives to get short sales done if a borrower is unable to qualify for a modified mortgage as part of the government's $75-billion effort to help troubled homeowners. Starting in April, the government will pay incentives to lenders and borrowers when a sale is completed.

Many economists view short sales as a way to address a problem that mortgage relief hasn't fixed: properties that are "under water," carrying more debt than the home is worth.

"Making short sales easier would go a long way to freeing up the market," said Richard Green, director of the Lusk Center for Real Estate. "Right now, if people are under water on their house, they are really stuck."

Short sales remain difficult. Uncertainty over home prices makes properties hard to value, lenders are understaffed and multiple loans on a home can trip up negotiations among creditors.

The Walkers faced some of these challenges. The couple paid $799,000 for their home in 2006, taking out loans from Countrywide Financial Corp. and National City Corp.

They spent most of their savings and ran up big credit card balances to redo their kitchen and landscaping. Even with her husband's $240,000 yearly salary, they were stretched thin making combined mortgage payments of $5,000 a month, Stephanie Walker said.

When Bob Walker's consulting contract was canceled, the couple fell behind on their house payments. They found jobs but their income suffered.

They listed the home for $875,000 but found no buyers. A foreclosure notice arrived. They were offered a three-month payment reduction from Bank of America but couldn't afford it. A short sale looked attractive.

One factor motivating banks to go along with short sales is that foreclosures typically cost more. Foreclosed properties often sit vacant, susceptible to damage from neglect or vandals. A study by Amherst Securities Group found that prime loans took an average loss of 45% in a foreclosure as opposed to 35% in a short sale.

"The bank or the investor is going to lose money on a short sale or a foreclosure," said J.K. Huey, senior vice president of Wells Fargo Home Mortgage. "You don't lose as much if you sell the property when it is occupied."

Representatives of Wells Fargo & Co., JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Bank of America Corp. said their companies had assigned more employees to handle short sales. But the sheer volume of requests has made it difficult to keep up.

"I wouldn't call it overwhelmed," said Matt Vernon, the executive in charge of short sales and bank-owned properties for Bank of America Home Loans. "But the volume has certainly stressed our current process."

Then there's the problem of second mortgages, which have proved to be a thorny impediment to the housing recovery. The loans were widespread during the boom years as people tapped rising equity or financed a down payment.

Of the 1.2 million U.S. properties in foreclosure, about 34%, or 403,670, have a second loan, according to RealtyTrac. In California, with 280,023 properties in foreclosure, about 46%, or 128,800, have a second loan.

"Those junior liens make short sales much more difficult and they make modification much more difficult," said Michael LaCour-Little, a finance professor at Cal State Fullerton who has studied the issue. The different banks "often have no incentive to cooperate."

Sally Quinn's second mortgage has complicated her short-sale attempts.

She is facing foreclosure on a Glendora town house that she bought as an investment property. Quinn said she has tried to arrange a short sale four times through her lenders, Bank of America and JPMorgan. Buyers, tired of waiting months for an answer from the banks, walked away on three occasions, and the banks rejected an offer from a fourth as too low, she said. She lined up a fifth buyer, she said, but BofA balked.

"It all came crashing down," she said.

The Walkers also found the short-sale process to be emotionally wrenching. Weighed down with debt and fearful they would be pursued by the bank that held their second mortgage, they filed for bankruptcy protection last summer.

In her blog, Stephanie Walker wrote that the struggle helped them focus on what was important: their love for each other.

As the blog grew in popularity, Walker hosted online question-and-answer sessions and the couple were featured in media reports. The attention helped the Walkers secure a plan for the future. A reader hired them as caretakers of a home in Washington state's San Juan Islands.

Last month, Walker retired the blog to focus on her next project, a baby due in July, posting: "I don't want my life to be forever tied to our foreclosure story. It's just time for me to move on."

Surge in foreclosures attracts lawyers who promise to renegotiate mortgages but don’t

What is one of the biggest businesses out there in the real estate spectrum? Loan modifications. What real estate business is fraught with fraud? Loan modifications! Paul Elias from the Associated Press reports about a growing trend of “people” that are victimizing homeowners. He focuses on rogue attorneys who are comfortable in taking peoples money without delivering any service.

An important word in my rant is “rogue”. If a home owner wants to do a loan modification, a QUALIFIED attorney is a great place to start. That said, there are many people (attorneys or not) that are scamming people out of a tremendous amount of money when it comes to loan modifications. If your clients or friends are considering hiring a company to do a loan modification, make sure they check their credentials before they engage. A great place to start is the Better Business Bureau.

Remember, the home owner, if they have the time, can do this themselves.

Surge in foreclosures attracts lawyers who promise to renegotiate mortgages but don’t
By PAUL ELIAS
The Associated Press


“I nearly ended up in a homeless shelter,” Warren Jacobs said of his hiring United Law Group to renegotiate the mortgage on his Mesquite, Texas, home.

SAN FRANCISCO | Warren Jacobs was desperate when he received a “robo-call” that promised to help him stave off foreclosure of his home near Dallas.

The father of six had lost his construction job, lacked health insurance and couldn’t pay the bills for his 17-year-old daughter’s cancer treatment, let alone his mortgage.

So on Jan. 21, he dialed the return number and was connected to the United Law Group. Minutes later, Jacobs agreed to scrape together $2,000 to pay the Irvine, Calif., law firm.

Jacobs unwittingly became one of the many thousands of homeowners who authorities say have been taken in by unscrupulous or incompetent loan-modification lawyers who rushed into a burgeoning niche: helping struggling homeowners renegotiate their mortgages.

Ripoffs of homeowners have become so common that state bar associations from Florida to Arizona are warning their members of the many ethical pitfalls that await those who exploit the mortgage crisis.

The California State Bar is investigating more than 400 lawyers who are suspected of ripping off thousands of homeowners nationwide.

The first to be charged was Sean Rutledge, the founder of the law firm that purported to represent Jacobs and 13 other homeowners.

Just months after securing a law license, Rutledge had been flying high. His United Law Group added several lawyers and opened offices in other states.

Today Rutledge’s license is suspended, his nascent career lies in tatters and he is under investigation in California and Ohio for taking fees of up to $3,500 from desperate homeowners then allegedly doing little — or nothing — to save their homes.

The California Bar in July formally charged Rutledge with not only failing to perform vital tasks to stop foreclosures, but also calling his clients “losers” in the rare occasions he returned their phone calls.

Rutledge has denied the allegations and said he would contest the attempt to disbar him. He is appealing the dismissal of a lawsuit he filed against the California Bar, alleging that the group violated federal laws that protect people with disabilities. Rutledge is diabetic and alleges state bar investigators, when scheduling meetings, ignored his need for treatment.

Rutledge did not return e-mail messages seeking comment, and he could not be reached through the United Law Group, which remains in business.

January was the 11th straight month in which more than 300,000 properties nationwide were subject to foreclosure filings, according to Irvine-based RealtyTrac, which predicts a record 3 million foreclosures this year.

Jacobs told investigators that Rutledge’s law firm advised him to stop making mortgage payments and cease communicating with his lender.

When the bank moved to seize the house for which Jacobs paid $175,000 in 2003, United Law Group failed to formally request “forbearance,” as it promised, to delay foreclosure. On June 1, Jacobs hired another lawyer to file bankruptcy on his behalf to stave off foreclosure the next day. In September, he agreed to a new payment plan with his bank and continues to live in the 4,000-square-foot house in suburban Dallas.

“I nearly ended up in a homeless shelter,” Jacobs said.

Earlier this month, Ohio Attorney General Richard Cordray filed a lawsuit against Rutledge and the United Law Group, alleging they defrauded homeowners in that state.

Nina Vultaggio, a spokeswoman for United Law Group, and others contend that the financial industry is behind the crackdown on lawyers. Vultaggio said that the financial industry is the biggest villain in the mortgage crisis and wants to deprive their customers of legal representation during complicated negotiations to save homes.

“When you get into trouble, you need an attorney to talk to these negotiators,” Vultaggio said.

Vultaggio said United Law Group has filed class-action lawsuits against Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase and Washington Mutual, alleging unfair business practices. The banks deny the allegations.

Legal experts still strongly recommend homeowners in peril hire lawyers to counsel them in how best to deal with their lenders, but state bar officials warn clients to research a lawyer’s background.

Jacobs said he is still waiting for United Law Group to refund the $2,000 fee he paid in January.

Mortgage officials try exits softer than foreclosures

Renae Merle from the Washington Post brings us a very interesting article that discusses what lenders are trying to do to stem the avalanche of foreclosures. She discussed some solutions that I have already commented on i.e.. Fannie and Freddie doing rent backs to the home owners after they have been foreclosed on – you remember...the Government can do this but us common folk cant!! The article discusses this program in more detail. What is new is a program that Citi is going to Pilot.

According to the article, Citi, “.... plans to announce a pilot program on Thursday that would allow delinquent borrowers who don't qualify for or decline mortgage relief the opportunity to stay in their homes without making payments for up to six months before turning over the keys, in return for keeping the property in good condition.” To me this sounds like a deed in lieu. While the home owner will (supposedly) be allowed to stay in their homes for 6 months, Citi failed to mention in the article that this will still count as a foreclosure on the homeowners credit report.

Citi feels that the new program will provide “an orderly process” when bringing bank owned properties back on the market. To me, it would simply delay the process by 6 months. At least Citi is coming up with solutions unlike most lenders who simply contribute to the problem.

Mortgage officials try exits softer than foreclosures
By Renae Merle
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, February 11, 2010


Seeking alternatives to the nation's struggling foreclosure prevention efforts, federal and mortgage industry officials increasingly are looking for ways to get distressed borrowers to leave their homes voluntarily, without going through the expensive foreclosure process or a messy eviction.

Mortgage officials try exits softer than foreclosures

Citigroup, for instance, plans to announce a pilot program on Thursday that would allow delinquent borrowers who don't qualify for or decline mortgage relief the opportunity to stay in their homes without making payments for up to six months before turning over the keys, in return for keeping the property in good condition. The bank estimates that up to 20,000 borrowers in Texas, Florida, Illinois, Michigan, New Jersey and Ohio could be eligible.

The program is just the latest amid a growing acknowledgment that foreclosure prevention efforts will fail to reach millions of borrowers over the next few years.

"This is a graceful way to move on with their lives instead of being foreclosed on and being evicted from their homes," said Sanjiv Das, chief executive of CitiMortgage.

The Citigroup plan attempts to address some common industry complaints, including borrowers who leave their homes in disarray after foreclosure, requiring lenders to spend thousands of dollars fixing up the property before putting it on the market. Also, homeowners who owe far more than their homes are worth increasingly are choosing to "strategically default," even though they can afford to pay their mortgage. The new program gives CitiMortgage more control over when distressed homes are put up for sale, bypassing clogged courthouses that have slowed the foreclosure process in many parts of the country.

By avoiding a glut of foreclosures that could hit the housing market within the next 16 to 18 months, the program -- if it is replicated throughout the industry -- could help prevent another dip in home prices, Das said.

It would be a more orderly process "than if all of the foreclosed properties came crashing at some point in the cycle," he said.

Other initiatives have also emerged for borrowers likely to lose their homes. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the mortgage financing companies, developed programs allowing former homeowners to become renters after a foreclosure or other proceedings. As part of its federal foreclosure prevention program, known as Making Home Affordable, the Treasury Department announced late last year that lenders would be eligible for $1,000 in exchange for allowing borrowers to sell their home in a short sale. In such deals, the borrower sells the home for less than the outstanding mortgage, and the lender forgives the difference.

Moody's Economy.com has forecast that the number of short sales and transactions in which borrowers surrender their deed in lieu of foreclosure will increase more than 50 percent, to about 490,000, this year. That is just a fraction of the 1.9 million homeowners Moody's has forecast will lose their homes to foreclosure this year, up from 1.7 million last year.

But lenders have struggled to make many of these programs effective. The short sale is often lengthy and cumbersome for homeowners. In some cases, borrowers have second liens on the property, which can hang up the process. And lenders are sometimes suspicious of the potential for fraud if the home is sold cheap to a friend or family member of the borrower.

It's unclear how rental programs for former homeowners are working. Fannie Mae launched its "Deed for Lease" program in November, offering borrowers a 12-month lease in return for turning over the keys to their former home and maintaining the property. A company spokeswoman said that it was too early to judge the program's success, but that former homeowners who surrender their deed to avoid foreclosure -- numbering nearly 2,000 through the third quarter of last year -- would be eligible. Freddie Mac's year-old program targets former homeowners after their foreclosure, offering them a month-to-month lease. It has not released specific data on how many homeowners have chosen this option.

Citigroup's program goes further. It targets delinquent homeowners who do not qualify for mortgage relief. During the time the borrower is still in the home, they must continue to pay utilities, but in some cases, the bank may help cover some of the taxes, insurance or homeowner association fees. The borrower would also be eligible for transition counseling to help find a new home, and a minimum of $1,000 to help offset moving costs.

If there is significant demand for the program, Citigroup will expand it, Das said. "There might be complications that we haven't thought about," he said. "What happens if they don't turn over the keys after six months or they don't maintain their house like we would like them to maintain their house?"

Reversal of fortune
After trend of rising prices, some housing markets see about-face

After trend of rising prices, some housing markets see about-face

Like many things in life, some things are too good to be true. Amy Hoak from the Wall Street Journal (MarketWatch) brings to us a very interesting article about a “double dip” in property values. Several major markets had experienced reasonable gains during the 4th quarter of 2009, only to see the gains wiped out by further price erosion. Ms Hoak reports that, “Nationwide, home values fell 5% in the fourth quarter compared with the fourth quarter a year earlier. Values fell 0.5% from the third quarter of 2009.”

Stan Humphries, Zillow's chief economist, said, “What we saw in mid-2009 was a brief respite from a larger market correction that has not yet run its course." Mr. Humphries feels that the second dip wont reach the magnitude of the first dip but is indicative of further price erosion.

Humphries further comments, “The remaining correction in home values we'll see in the first half of this year is a function of market fundamentals, such as the increasing flow of foreclosures, high levels of inventory in the market and a probable decrease in demand as the impact of the tax credit wanes and mortgage rates rise. The next few months will likely show more declines in home values in most markets, Humphries said. But he expects that, on a national basis, home prices should still hit bottom by the middle of the year. Thereafter," he said, "home values are likely to bounce along the bottom with real appreciation remaining negligible for some time."

Reversal of fortune
After trend of rising prices, some housing markets see about-face
By Amy Hoak, MarketWatch


CHICAGO (MarketWatch) -- One in five housing markets entered a second leg of home price declines in late 2009, after showing price increases for nearly half of last year, according to a report released Wednesday by Zillow.com, a real-estate Web site.

In 29 of the 143 markets tracked by the site -- including Boston, Atlanta and San Diego -- prices flattened or began to decrease again in the second part of last year, after five or more months of consecutive monthly increases, according to the site's fourth quarter real-estate market report.

Home prices in another 29 markets, including Los Angeles and New York, increased each month throughout the fourth quarter. But the rate of increase slowed from November to December in 21 markets, according to the data.

Nationwide, home values fell 5% in the fourth quarter compared with the fourth quarter a year earlier. Values fell 0.5% from the third quarter of 2009.

"While we have seen strong stabilization in home values during 2009, there are clear signs that they will turn more negative in the near-term," said Stan Humphries, Zillow's chief economist, in a news release.

"What we saw in mid-2009 was a brief respite from a larger market correction that has not yet run its course," he said.

Still, Humphries said markets that see a "double dip" in values before reaching a bottom won't see a return "to the magnitude of depreciation seen earlier." Instead, the drop will look like a "modest aftershock" of the initial drop in prices. In this scenario, a "double dip" is defined as two periods of sustained declines separated by a brief stabilization or recovery, according to the release.

The report also found the percentage of single-family homes with mortgages in negative equity rose slightly, to 21.4% in the fourth quarter, compared with 21% in the third quarter. Twenty-three percent were underwater in the second quarter.

And homeowners who lost their homes to foreclosure reached a high in December: More than one in every thousand homes was foreclosed on that month, the highest since Zillow began recording national foreclosure data in 2000.

More price drops expected

A home-buyer tax credit, lower interest rates and increased lending backed by the Federal Housing Administration helped fuel the recent stabilization in prices, Humphries said.

"The remaining correction in home values we'll see in the first half of this year is a function of market fundamentals, such as the increasing flow of foreclosures, high levels of inventory in the market and a probable decrease in demand as the impact of the tax credit wanes and mortgage rates rise," he said.

The next few months will likely show more declines in home values in most markets, Humphries said. But he expects that, on a national basis, home prices should still hit bottom by the middle of the year.

"Thereafter," he said, "home values are likely to bounce along the bottom with real appreciation remaining negligible for some time."

Arizona Anti-Deficiency Laws Only Cover Foreclosure, Not Short Sales

While this article comes to us from Arizona, the message needs to be heeded everywhere! Foreclosure laws are constantly changing from state to state. What that means to you is that unless you are a real estate attorney you shouldn’t be in the business of interpreting law. The article is actually more of a message. The message is, “Consulting an attorney sounds like sound advice- no matter what state you live in.”

Arizona Anti-Deficiency Laws Only Cover Foreclosure, Not Short Sales
By twist

Considering a short sale in Arizona? It pays to be careful. M forwarded me the following information that he received, which came from a discussion with Tom Farley, CEO of the Arizona Association of Realtors. It stated:

One issue that Tim made perfectly clear, and we all felt was important to get out to those of you who may not have attended, is this. In Arizona, there is anti-deficiency protection for a large number of property owners who go through foreclosure, however, there is no statute that proves anti-deficiency protection to any property owner in the case of a short sale. Our anti-deficiency laws only cover foreclosure.

Tom Farley stressed that it is important that we not make incorrect representations to the sellers in this regard. The deficiency protection they may be able to receive is only found in the terms of the short sale approval letter provided by the lender. If the lender does not fully release them from the lien, but only releases the property to close and transfer, there is not any guarantee that the lender will not pursue the seller for the remainder of the unpaid balance on the note.

One popular myth that was dispelled at yesterday's meeting is that there was protection if it was purchase money. This is not true. While some lenders are providing the release in these cases they are not obligated to do so. Tom stressed the importance of legal counsel for sellers facing short sale with regards to this issue once again.

I'm not familiar with the law in this case, but consulting an attorney sounds like sound advice- no matter what state you live in.

Short sales soar while foreclosure sales slacken

Buck Wargo from the Las Vegas Sun Times reports on a trend in Las Vegas. Mr. Wargo reports that the number of foreclosures and gone down while the number of short sales has increased. This is a trend that bodes well for homeowners. In most cases a short sale is in the best interest of a home owner as compared to a foreclosure.

Interesting excerpts from the article include, “In Las Vegas, banks make $80 per square foot on foreclosures but $130 per square foot on average in short sales, said Steve Bottfeld, executive vice president of Marketing Solutions.

“I think the bottom line is that short sales ultimately replace foreclosures because of the financial impact on the financial institutions,” Bottfeld said. “The banks are going to look at it differently and opt for more short sales.”

Analysts said short sales will get a boost in 2010 because of a push by the federal government. The Treasury Department is offering incentives on short sales by providing a $2,500 subsidy, $1,000 to the servicer and $1,500 to the seller for moving expenses. In addition, investors can get $1,000 by allowing subordinate lenders to get $3,000 in proceeds from the sale. The program is effective April 5, but servicers can implement it earlier.

Short sales make financial sense for lenders, analysts said.

In Las Vegas, banks make $80 per square foot on foreclosures but $130 per square foot on average in short sales, said Steve Bottfeld, executive vice president of Marketing Solutions.

“I think the bottom line is that short sales ultimately replace foreclosures because of the financial impact on the financial institutions,” Bottfeld said. “The banks are going to look at it differently and opt for more short sales.”

While this article comes from Nevada, other markets are experiencing the same trends. So, while people are banking on loan modifications, short sales can be a solution.

Short sales soar while foreclosure sales slacken
By Buck Wargo (contact), In Business reporter LV Sun
Fri, Jan 29, 2010 (3 a.m.)


Las Vegas and the state may be changing from the nation’s foreclosure capital to a housing market dominated by short sales.

In the last four months of 2009, the number of foreclosure sales has dropped and lenders have consented in greater numbers to short sales — in which they allow homes to be sold for less than the owner owes on the mortgage. That trend should continue in 2010, according to Realtors and housing analysts.

The statistics prove that as well.

Research firm Applied Analysis reported fewer than 300 short sales a month on average in the first four months of 2009 based on homes sold on the Multiple Listing Service. In May the numbers slowly started increasing, and over the last two months, short sales have averaged close to 700 a month. January has similar numbers, said Brian Gordon, Applied Analysis principal.

Short sales averaged about 7 percent to 8 percent of total existing-home closings in early 2009, but averaged 22 percent of the market by the end of the year and in early January, he said.

SalesTraq, another research firm, reported that foreclosures made up 50 percent of existing-home closings in 2009 compared with 67 percent to 70 percent in 2008. The reason is short sales made up a bigger chunk of sales.

“We have seen a decrease in foreclosure activity in Las Vegas, which was puzzling to us,” said Daren Bloomquist, marketing manager for California-based RealtyTrac, which monitors foreclosures in Nevada. “Maybe Las Vegas has become somewhat of a test ground for streamlining short sales. It sounds like it could have an impact in Las Vegas.”

Traditionally, a short sale has been a time-consuming process that for much of the housing downturn has been unsuccessful as lenders prefer homes going into foreclosure. Now, lenders are trying to streamline the process.

One analysts said only one in four short-sale attempts were successful in 2009.

Short sales make financial sense for lenders, analysts said.

In Las Vegas, banks make $80 per square foot on foreclosures but $130 per square foot on average in short sales, said Steve Bottfeld, executive vice president of Marketing Solutions.

“I think the bottom line is that short sales ultimately replace foreclosures because of the financial impact on the financial institutions,” Bottfeld said. “The banks are going to look at it differently and opt for more short sales.”

Analysts said short sales will get a boost in 2010 because of a push by the federal government. The Treasury Department is offering incentives on short sales by providing a $2,500 subsidy, $1,000 to the servicer and $1,500 to the seller for moving expenses. In addition, investors can get $1,000 by allowing subordinate lenders to get $3,000 in proceeds from the sale. The program is effective April 5, but servicers can implement it earlier.

Dennis Smith, president of Home Builders Research, said short sales will be the “story of the year” because of the effect they will have on the housing market.

“It should cause prices to increase a little,” Smith said. “We have seen prices flatten the last five to seven months, and one reason is because we haven’t been flooded with all these foreclosures. They are doing more short sales.”

John Mechem, a spokesman for the Mortgage Bankers Association, said what is happening in Las Vegas is occurring across the country. It is costly for lenders to go through the legal process of foreclosing, and he added that homes can be damaged over time. The return is better on short sale, he said.

Lenders just want to get the home back on the market as soon as possible, Mechem said. “They are not in the business of being landlords or property maintenance.”

Lenders’ willingness to approve more short sales has been a relief to Realtors who have been frustrated because they have worked on deals for more than a year in some cases, only to have the deal rejected in the end.

Linda Rheinberger, president of the Nevada Association of Realtors, said it appears short sales are the future as banks and asset managers catch on ways to avoid letting homes go into foreclosure.

“There is a lot of political and social pressure on banks, especially those that received stimulus money, and they have been highly encouraged to do this,” Rheinberger said.

Some analysts have suggested that the push for more short sales could lead to lenders’ willingness to reduce principal from mortgages and allow homeowners to stay in their home.

Robyn Yates, broker/owner of Windermere Real Estate, said with more than 75 percent of homeowners underwater — they owe more on their homes than the homes are worth — it’s unlikely lenders will agree to that.

“I don’t know how they can do that,” Yates said. “If you think about it, what would happen if 77 percent of homeowners went to the banks and asked their principal to be reduced?”

Bloomquist contends that short sales could be a better way to address the foreclosure problem than modifications because it includes a new borrower with a new loan that is based on reasonable lending standards, Bloomquist said.

“That could be much better for long-term success,” he said.

Flaws plague foreclosure relief program

Senior producer John Schoen from MSNBC, reports on the quagmire known as foreclosure relief! He reports that multiple programs that are supposed to help home owners typically don’t. No one knows how to qualify for a loan mod because the Treasury Department hasn’t released the magical formula that makes this determination. One must also understand that institutions that are servicing loans stand more to gain by dragging the process out (up to 6% of the mortgage amount ) as opposed to the $4000 the government gives to these companies for modifying a mortgage.

2.8 Million foreclosures were filed last year. Experts believe that more than 3.5 Million foreclosures will be filed this year. This is partially due to sky rocketing unemployment but also due to exotic mortgages resetting. While servicing companies can lower interest rates and extend the repayment term, they can also lower the principal that is owed by the homeowner. The problem is that lowering the principal rarely happens.

An interesting comment from the article was, “Under HAMP guidelines, lenders can deny a loan modification if the “net present value” of the new loan is less than the return they would get from not offering a new loan and going through with foreclosure instead. In other words, the official guidelines allow mortgage servicers to base their decision entirely on whether the outcome is in the best interest of the lender or investor, not the homeowner.” Somebody out there has a very strong lobby! I wonder who!?

Flaws plague foreclosure relief program
Latest effort to save homes having only limited impact
By John W. Schoen
Senior producer
msnbc.com


Millions of Americans who are struggling to save their homes from foreclosure are trapped in a labyrinth of disappointment and misinformation created by the very institutions they’ve been told are trying to help them.

Ten months into the government’s third program in two years to stop a record wave of foreclosures, homeowners, housing counselors, consumer advocates and attorneys working with borrowers report that the latest effort is falling far short of its goal. In many cases, lenders are moving to foreclose even after homeowners get approved for loan modification, housing counselors and attorneys say.

The problem, they say, goes beyond the paperwork snafus and staffing shortages at lenders and mortgage servicers that have created massive bottlenecks for the millions at risk of losing their homes. Those have plagued the government’s foreclosure relief efforts since the first government-industry joint program, the Hope Now Alliance, was launched in October 2007.

Homeowners face numerous hurdles trying to get their mortgage modified. In some cases, applications are rejected with little or no explanation. It’s impossible to independently verify if a homeowner qualifies because the Treasury has not disclosed the eligibility formula used by lenders — a complex set of calculations that housing counselors and consumer attorneys have dubbed “the black box.” Housing attorneys report that some lenders are ignoring the program’s guidelines altogether and moving to foreclose without properly reviewing mortgages for possible modification.

“It’s been a stubborn challenge," said a Treasury official, who agreed to an interview but requested anonymity. "But this is something that’s never been done before."

Guidelines ignored

Many of the urgent problems with the government’s $75 billion Home Affordable Modification Program, or HAMP, are systemic. They can be traced to its basic guidelines for lenders and mortgage servicers — the companies tasked with collecting payments from homeowners and forwarding them to the investors holding a homeowner’s mortgage.

Launched last March as part of the Making Home Affordable initiative, HAMP was the Obama administration’s flagship program to halt a wave of foreclosures that two previous government efforts — the Hope Now Alliance and Hope for Homeowners — had failed to slow. In return for signing on to the program, lenders and mortgage servicers who agree to follow standard loan modification guidelines are paid a taxpayer-funded bounty of up to $4,000 for each loan they modify. Homeowners begin with a “trial” modification that is supposed to be made permanent if they keep up with payments for six months.

The HAMP guidelines call on lenders to try to modify every mortgage before moving to foreclosure. But that’s not what’s happening, according to a survey of more than 100 housing attorneys by the National Association of Consumer Advocates.

“Ninety-five percent (of the attorneys surveyed) said that a (mortgage) servicer had attempted to proceed with a foreclosure sale without a proper HAMP review,” said Ellen Taverna, a NACA associate who conducted the survey. Nearly half the housing attorneys said they have represented 10 or more households who had faced a foreclosure without a proper loan review; 14 percent said they have represented 50 or more households in that situation.

So far, the HAMP program hasn’t slowed a record pace of foreclosures. Some 2.8 million households were threatened with foreclosure last year, according to RealtyTrac, a Web site that tracks foreclosure filing nationwide. The company estimates the figure could rise to 3.5 million this year as payments reset on a wave of "pay option" adjustable-rate mortgages, which came with an especially nasty feature called "negative amortization." Simply put, these homeowners face the prospect of a rising mortgage balance - leaving them owing more than they originally borrowed.

Frustrated by the lack of progress with loan modifications, some homeowners are giving up and choosing “strategic default” — simply walking away from their homes. Those defaults, and the ongoing wave of foreclosures, will continue to weigh on the housing market, holding back the nascent economic recovery.

Saving a home from foreclosure can be as simple as rewriting a costly, high-rate subprime loan to prevailing mortgage market rates. If that doesn’t bring the payment to within roughly 31 percent of a homeowners’ monthly income, HAMP guidelines require mortgage servicers to follow a step-by-step process to cut mortgage payments further. First, they can write down the interest rate to as low as 2 percent and then stretch the term of the loan to 40 years. If that doesn’t work, lenders can cut the amount of principal owed.

But cutting principal is entirely voluntary, and most lenders aren’t doing so, housing counselors and attorneys say.

“I don’t think it’s common at all,” said Helene Reynaud, vice president of national grants for the National Foundation for Credit Counseling. “When we ask our counselors, they never seem to see them. Or very, very rarely.”

'More confused than ever' Even if a homeowner gets a “trial” modification - and makes each new payment on time - they can still lose their home.

“The foreclosure and loan modification proceed on two separate tracks,” said Diane Thompson, an attorney with the National Consumer Law Center, who recently wrote a report on financial incentives that often encourage mortgage services to foreclose. “If you allow the foreclosure process to continue you’re going to end up with (foreclosure) sales because there’s not good communication between those two divisions in servicers.”

That’s what happened to Courtney Scott, a retired nurse living in an Atlanta suburb, who has spent the last two years trying to get Bank of America to modify her loan.

A week before Christmas, she got a letter saying that her mortgage was going to foreclosure, even though the bank hadn’t reviewed her application for a loan modification. Desperate to save her home, along with her substantial down payment and the equity she’s accumulated by making repairs, Scott says, she spent several hours on the phone trying to get through to bank representatives. When she finally reached them they were unable to find her application.

They told her that she would have resubmit it, which she did.

So she was thrilled when the good news arrived via e-mail Jan. 4.

“Your loan modification has been approved,” the e-mail said, asserting that a full package of documents was in the mail and that a “workout negotiator” would soon be in touch by phone.

“This will be a great end to what has been an unnecessarily drawn-out story,” she told msnbc.com.

But Scott’s joy was short-lived.

On Jan. 12, she got a call from a bank representative who told her that she didn't qualify for a new loan after all. A follow-up email confirmed the bad news.

“I am more confused than ever,” said Scott.

(A Bank of America spokeswoman declined to comment, citing privacy laws, but said she would look into Scott's case.)

The communications breakdown is more likely when foreclosures are handled by outside attorneys hired by a loan servicer, say housing counselors. If the lender or servicer doesn’t take the extra steps required to stop the clock on a foreclosure proceeding, it can easily overtake the process of modifying a loan, they say.

“The (foreclosure) process carries on a momentum of its own,” said Thompson. “Some of it happens more or less automatically once you start scheduling things. Once a sale is scheduled, someone has to actively intervene to stop the sale, and the current guidance from Treasury allows a (foreclosure) sale to be scheduled even if someone is making current payments on their trial modification.”

The Treasury official said that guideline is under review.

"We certainly hear the issue, and want to make sure the (HAMP) guideline on foreclosure prevents anyone’s home from going to sale," the Treasury official said. "We are looking at guidance to make sure the communication is clear."

The 'Black Box'

Homeowners who have been turned down for a modified mortgage report that servicers often don't spell out why they deny an application, say housing advocates. With no formal appeals process, HAMP makes it extremely difficult for homeowners and their counselors to figure out whether their applications were properly reviewed.

Attempts to contact lenders and servicers often go unheeded, according to Brenda Lopez, chief operating officer at SurePath Financial Solutions, a HUD-approved credit counseling service in Camarillo, Calif.

“They say, ‘I don’t have access to that information,’ and then they transfer you, and then they’ll transfer you again,” she said. “Then they’ll tell you, 'The case is already closed, you cannot reach the negotiator and I don’t have that expertise to tell you why it got denied. It got denied.' And that’s it.”

Late last year, the government "issued instructions for servicers to specify in detail" why a borrower was rejected for the program and to consider other loan mitigation options, the Treasury official said.

Worse, say housing counselors and attorneys, there is no way to independently verify whether a lender or servicer has followed the government’s HAMP guidelines. That’s because the Treasury hasn't disclosed the "black box" formula used to decide which loans will get modified.

Under HAMP guidelines, lenders can deny a loan modification if the “net present value” of the new loan is less than the return they would get from not offering a new loan and going through with foreclosure instead. In other words, the official guidelines allow mortgage servicers to base their decision entirely on whether the outcome is in the best interest of the lender or investor, not the homeowner.

Because the Treasury has kept the formula a secret, homeowners who have been rejected for modification can't check the lender’s math to correct possible mistakes about the borrower's income, home value, credit score or other critical pieces of data.

“As long as there is secrecy around the formula, and it’s not well understood how it functions, that’s a big issue,” said Reynaud.

In response to requests from housing counselors and attorneys, the Treasury plans to provide more information on the formula by the end of the first quarter, the Treasury official told msnbc.com.

That secret formula also has slowed loan modification negotiations with homeowners because many lenders are apparently unwilling to deviate from the formula, even if the investor holding the mortgage is willing to be more flexible, according to housing counselors.

“Many of the investors are anxious to do a workout that goes beyond the standardized approach that the servicers have scripted,” said David Berenbaum, chief program officer at the National Community Reinvestment Coalition, which oversees a national network of housing counselors. “The servicers blow a gasket when (our counselors) call the investors (directly.) They get very upset with us. But ultimately there's nothing they can do.”

That kind of end run is exactly what happened last week in Scott’s case. While she continues to try to appeal her loan modification rejection with her bank, she said she was surprised by a call from someone representing the investor holding her loan, who said they were offering another chance to modify her mortgage with a slightly lower payment. (Scott is working with a local HUD office to follow up on the offer.)

The number of homeowners who have been helped by the program has been dismally small.

When first announced last year, Treasury officials said they hoped to stop as many as 4 million foreclosures. But HAMP guidelines initially were incomplete, and mortgage servicers complained they weren’t given enough guidance on how they should be applied.

For their part, lenders and loan servicers express their own frustrations with the HAMP program. They note that some homeowners don’t respond to their outreach efforts, fail to properly fill out applications and often submit incomplete paperwork.

They also complain that the HAMP program has been plagued with numerous revisions and delays in issuing technical details attached to broad guidelines. Since April 2009, new program requirements were released nine times, and more than 90 clarifications were issued for new or revised forms, reporting changes and policies, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association. The changes meant mortgage servicers had to alter their procedures and retrain employees, which added to delays.

In July, as the pace of foreclosures continued to rise, major lenders were summoned to a Washington meeting with Treasury officials. There, they committed to modify 500,000 mortgages by Nov. 1.

By the end of December just 66,000 homeowners had been issued permanent loan modifications, with temporary modifications in place for about 850,000 more (who still faced the prospect of having it reversed by the lender.)

The Treasury official said the major focus now is on converting those temporary modifications to permanent loans.

Some banks and lenders have done better than others, according to a recent report by ProPublica, an independent, non-profit newsroom that produces investigative journalism.

“The big names are among the worst-performing servicers,” according to ProPublica. “Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, CitiMortgage and Wells Fargo together account for more than 60 percent of the 3.4 million mortgages eligible for the program. All four have converted a small percentage of the trials begun three or more months ago into permanent modifications. The highest is Wells Fargo, with only 13 percent."

Some housing counselors think the Treasury needs to get tougher with lenders and loan servicers who don’t follow the guidelines that call for a thorough loan review before moving to foreclosure.

“I don’t think that Treasury has reached the point where they can even enforce their own directives, either because they don’t have the resources or the tools to punish the servicers,“ said Reynaud.

Others say the lack of enforcement is the result of problems with the program itself, starting with the contracts lenders and servicers signed with the Treasury to participate in HAMP.

“In most circumstances, all (Treasury) can do is ban servicers from the program,” said Thompson. “And that’s not a very effective way of getting them to make modifications if they’re not already making them.”

Treasury officials say they expect to make some relatively minor changes this week to HAMP guidelines. But a growing number of stakeholders think broader changes are needed.

Lenders note that, since foreclosures began surging more than two years ago, the primary cause has shifted from rate adjustments to job loss, which leaves homeowners unable to manage even a lower monthly payment.

The MBA wants to see the HAMP program modified to include standard guidelines for loan forbearance, in which lenders temporarily suspend payments until the borrower can find a new job. It also wants to HAMP guidelines expanded to include interest-only loans, which the trade groups says could help more people get an affordable loan.

Others suggest it’s time to revisit a proposal, fiercely opposed by the lending industry, to allow bankruptcy judges to modify mortgages from the bench. (Primary mortgages are currently the only form of debt excluded from so called “judicial modification.”) Housing advocates say changing the bankruptcy law would dramatically speed the pace of loan modifications and save millions of homes from foreclosure.

“There are many people in the industry who would be glad to see HAMP go or who don’t believe that these modifications can work,” said Thompson. “Most people who are representing consumers think that there are there are significant flaws in the program’s design, but that some kind of government-sponsored modification program is essential to get us out of the foreclosure crisis.”

Cage's Foreclosure Sells Quickly
While this article is specific to Nicholas Cage, it also points out what we have been saying all along. The higher end luxury market segment is fraught with foreclosures. However, the high end luxury market is also flooded with buyers looking for bargains. People are buying high end properties as long as the properties are priced correctly.

Cage's Foreclosure Sells Quickly
26 January 2010 @ 02:04 pm EDT

Actor Nicolas Cage's foreclosed 14,306-square-foot Las Vegas home sold the first day it was on the market for $4.95 million. The deal is expected to close Wednesday.

Cage purchased the six-bedroom, seven-and-a-half bathroom home in September 2006 for $8.5 million. He owes the Internal Revenue Service nearly $6 million in back taxes, and the IRS has foreclosed on four of his homes including two in New Orleans and one in California.

Kenneth Lowman, owner of Luxury Homes of Las Vegas, listed and sold the Las Vegas property. He says the luxury home segment of the market moves in tandem with the stock market. As stock rise, so do top-dollar properties.

"I've been preaching to all of my potential buyers who are waiting in the wings the same message over and over. If you have the wherewithal, now is the time," Lowman says.

Waiver OK'd on flipping houses

Leslie Berkman from the Press Enterprise reports on a recent development with the FHA. Effective February 1, 2010 (with a tentative end date of February 1, 2011), the FHA has eliminated the 90 day seasoning requirement for people that purchase homes that are financed with FHA mortgages. Prior to the change, individuals who purchased homes, could not sell them to buyers with FHA mortgages for 90 days. This effectively shut out many a home owner from purchasing properties that were acquired by investors.

The 90 day seasoning requirement discouraged people from purchasing properties in areas that were typically funded by FHA mortgages. Why? When a person purchases something (whether it be a house, a car or grandfather clock) they want the right and the flexibility to sell it when they want. Pure and simple. So, don’t be a hater! If it helps the economy and helps people, support it! Who knows, maybe Bank of America will get a clue!

Waiver OK'd on flipping houses

10:00 PM PST on Monday, January 18, 2010
By LESLIE BERKMAN
The Press-Enterprise


In a move that could make foreclosed properties more attractive to investors and increase the number of homes available to first-time buyers, the federal government is temporarily lifting a prohibition against providing FHA mortgage insurance for homes that are resold within 90 days.

The Department of Housing and Urban Development designed the regulation to discourage the flipping of houses by investors that drove up prices during the housing market boom of a few years ago. But critics say its unintended effect has been to reduce the options of first-time buyers who already are competing for a shrunken supply of homes for sale.

Last year banks slowed the flow of properties headed to foreclosure, possibly in an effort to modify troubled mortgages to make them more affordable or to avoid posting losses when the homes are sold.

The waiver on the purchase of flipped houses with FHA mortgages, which begins Feb. 1 and is effective for one year, "will give FHA borrowers access to a broader array of recently foreclosed properties," HUD said Friday in announcing the change.

Conditions attached to the waiver are expected to prevent what HUD called "predatory practices" by investors. For instance, when a house is resold within 90 days of purchase at a price that is 20 percent higher, the seller would have to justify the increase, such as by showing how much was spent on repairs and renovation.

Some real estate experts complain that investors who come into the foreclosure market with cash have an unfair advantage over first-time buyers who are less attractive to the banks because they frequently can afford only minimum down payments.

Other experts argue that investors perform a community service by buying and fixing up the most distressed and vandalized foreclosed houses that otherwise would be uninhabitable and ineligible for FHA financing. But they add that in many cases investors have not been able to sell the refurbished houses to FHA buyers because they could not wait 90 days to recoup their purchase, rehabilitation and holding costs.

So instead of first-time buyers with FHA mortgages getting such houses, they often have been sold to investors who have converted them to rentals or to people who could afford the larger down payments required for conventional financing.

Rich Cosner, president of Prudential California Realty with nine offices in Orange, Riverside and San Bernardino counties, said because of the FHA restriction against insuring loans on houses bought from flippers, many first-time buyers "were locked out of some of the best houses."

Investor-owned houses that are "flipped" represent "a small but growing percentage of the resale market," said Andrew LePage, a spokesman for DataQuick Information Systems, which tracks housing sales and prices. LePage said absentee buyers, most of whom are investors, in December accounted for 24 percent of sales in Riverside County and 28 percent in San Bernardino County.

In November homes resold after being owned no more than 180 days represented 3 percent of sales in Riverside County and 4 percent in San Bernardino County, LePage said.

More investors

Nicholas Manfredi, president of the Corona-based Inland Empire Investors Forum, said HUD's waiver was greeted with joy by his investor colleagues.

"They were high-fiving me in the gym this morning," he said Monday.

Manfredi said he is certain the change will attract more investors who will buy houses in neighborhoods dominated by FHA buyers. He said previously some investors shied away from these lower-price neighborhoods, which he said had the effect of perpetuating community blight.

However, Manfredi said the future of the Inland foreclosure market is too murky for him to recommend that investors dive into flipping. His biggest worry, he said, is that the change in federal policy may mean that the government expects banks to start allowing their backlog of delinquent loans to rush to foreclosure. If that happens, he said, home prices will fall and harm anyone needing to quickly sell investment properties.

Several local real estate agents, including Joyce Aragon, a sales agent for All National Realty in Ontario and president of the Inland Valley Association of Realtors, say in recent weeks they have seen an uptick in the volume of repossessed homes coming to market.

Pete Nyiri, owner of Top Producers Realty in Corona, a major broker of repossessed houses, said the number of foreclosures that banks assigned to him last month increased 40 percent and many of those have yet to be listed.

First Bank donates foreclosure in H.P.

The business journal of Winston Salem reports on a bank with a heart. Why can’t each and every lender in each and every state do what First Bank did? First Bank donated a house to a non profit organization. The house will go to a low or moderate income family that otherwise couldn’t afford a house. While this wont extinguish the glut of foreclosed properties, it will certainly help families in need. That’s what life is about, isn’t it?

Monday, January 18, 2010, 10:16am EST
First Bank donates foreclosure in H.P.
The Business Journal of the Greater Triad Area


First Bank has donated a foreclosed home in High Point to the nonprofit group SHARE of North Carolina, according to an announcement.

The home will go to a low- or moderate-income family, the announcement said.

SHARE stands for "self-help and rewarded efforts," and the group provides education, training and affordable housing in High Point. The organization was founded in 2001.

Jerry Ocheltree, CEO of the Troy-based First Bank, said SHARE is a good partner for the bank's philanthropic efforts.

"By joining together with SHARE of North Carolina, one neighbor to another, we can make a difference in the lives of a family by giving them security, support and hope for a brighter future," he said.

Dramatic decline in foreclosures in California

The central Valley Business Times reported that foreclosures dropped dramatically in California in December of 2009. But................that's not the rest of the story. The reason behind this drop is because of the holiday foreclosure moratoriums that were in place. Lenders weren't foreclosing. Expect a dramatic increase in foreclosures in January with delinquencies and unemployment going way up.

Another interesting part of the story involved lenders auction prices. The price that lenders set when auctioning properties at the courthouse step increased by almost 7%. Investors that have been banking on purchasing properties at auction are now paying more for their properties. What does this mean? Who knows. It could mean that the market is stabilizing or it could mean that the banks are getting greedy. You decide!

Dramatic decline in foreclosures in California

DISCOVERY BAY
January 13, 2010 12:01am


• December sees 32.5 percent drop by one measure
• ‘May have been a Christmas gift to homeowners”

Who knew Santa Claus looked like a banker? Hard-pressed homeowners in the Central Valley and elsewhere in California got a sort of Christmas gift from the banks last month when foreclosure rates dropped dramatically, according to a report from ForeclosureRadar Inc. of Discovery Bay, which tracks the state’s foreclosures daily.

Foreclosure activity dropped dramatically in December, especially when looked at on a daily average basis, the company’s newest report says. While Notices of Default dropped 17.5 percent in aggregate, they actually dropped 32.5 percent on a daily average basis due to the fact that December had 22 days on which documents were recorded, versus 18 in November.

“The dramatic drop in foreclosure activity may have been a Christmas gift to homeowners,” says Sean O’Toole, founder and CEO of ForeclosureRadar. “However, given rising mortgage delinquencies it is becoming increasingly clear that foreclosure activity no longer fully represents market realities.” One of the largest declines came in the number of properties sold to third parties, he says.

Auction buying opportunity only exists because lenders have been discounting opening bids to levels attractive to investors, the report says. That discounting declined in December, and with it so did third party sales.

“The discounts received by third party investors at the courthouse steps dropped dramatically in December, likely explaining the steep drop in the number of foreclosures sold to third parties. For most of the last year lenders discounted the opening bid from the amount they were owed by nearly 40 percent, last month that dropped to 33.7 percent,” he says. “The percentage of sales that were discounted also declined, from nearly 90 percent one year ago, to just 75 percent in December.’

On an average daily basis, cancellations only increased 3.5 percent -- a smaller increase than expected given the Obama administration’s drive to make trial loan modifications under their Home Affordable Modification Program permanent, Mr. O’Toole says.

“Based on the timing of these cancellations, we believe 21 percent were canceled due the statutory requirement that a foreclosure sale be held within one year, thus forcing cancellation; 61.9 percent were likely due to some form of loan workout, whether it be through a HAMP modification, short sale or refinance; and 17.1 percent most likely due to a filing error,” he says.

In the Central Valley, ForeclosureRadar reports the following foreclosure activity by county. The number of Notices of Default for last month are listed first, followed by Novembers in parentheses and by December 2008 in brackets.

Dubai’s First Foreclosure May Open Floodgates in Worst Market

Zainab Fattah from Business week wrote an interesting article that describes the ailing real estate market in Dubai. Dubai used to be the safe bet for real estate investors. Property prices quadrupled since 2002, the year when foreigners were allowed to start buying properties. The first foreclosure filing was recently recorded which challenged some long standing traditions and laws. What does this mean to us? My take is that investors that were flocking to Dubai are going to be looking to secure properties in other areas. Where you might ask? My guess is the USA.

Dubai’s First Foreclosure May Open Floodgates in Worst Market
January 11, 2010, 04:40 PM EST
By Zainab Fattah

Jan. 11 (Bloomberg) -- Dubai’s housing rout sent prices down 52 percent in the past year, prompting some homeowners to abandon their cars and mortgage payments and flee the country. Not one received a foreclosure notice. Until now.

Barclays Plc. won the sheikdom’s first foreclosure cases in court, clearing the way for lenders holding about $16 billion of Dubai home loans to take action when borrowers don’t pay. Islamic lender Tamweel PJSC, the emirate’s biggest mortgage bank, has several of its own foreclosure claims pending and estimates about 3 percent of its mortgages are in default.

“Banks will be more aggressive in pursuing legal action if they see the process is efficient,” said Antoine Yacoub, a banking analyst at Moody’s Investors Service Inc. “They were trying to avoid the courts and restructure most of their loans, but once they see a precedent has been set, they will be encouraged to push more cases through.”

The successful foreclosures by Barclays may open the floodgates in Dubai’s property market, which went from the world’s best in 2008 to the worst after credit dried up and speculators who had fueled price increases left the market, according to Deutsche Bank AG. Moody’s estimated in September that 12 percent of the 27,000 residential mortgages in the sheikdom would default within 12 to 18 months. Banks and developers until now have avoided the process of reclaiming homes through the courts, barred by tradition and an arcane legal process that few understood. The Barclays and Tamweel cases may change that, because they show that a 2008 mortgage law -- setting out rules for default, foreclosure and repossession -- is working.

Mortgage Law

The law requires lenders to give homeowners 30-day notice of their intent to pursue a foreclosure, said Jody Waugh, a partner at law firm Al Tamimi & Co. in Dubai. Courts then review the case and can issue a debt judgment that turns the property over to Dubai’s Land Department for auction. Waugh estimates the process may take two to four months.

Barclays, Britain’s second-largest bank, said in an e- mailed reply to questions that it won the foreclosure orders, without providing details of the cases. The ruling shows that Dubai’s market is “evolving and is poised to come at par with other mature markets of the world,” the bank said.

Both lenders and developers in the United Arab Emirates have tried to stem rising defaults through out-of-court settlements with distressed customers after falling prices left buyers with mortgages worth more than their properties. That has helped minimize the amount of bad debt on their balance sheets and kept repossessed houses off a market that’s already suffering from too much supply. Provisions for bad loans in the U.A.E. surged 68 percent by to 32 billion dirhams ($8.7 billion) as of November, compared with a year earlier.

Abandoned Homes

Before the mortgage law was passed, lenders and builders could resort to the courts to enforce contracts, though they didn’t have the right to foreclose. Tamweel’s pending cases, filed almost two months ago, involve homes abandoned by owners who left Dubai at the onset of the global financial crisis, Chief Executive Officer Wasim Saifi said. Tamweel’s default rate has been “hovering between 2.5 percent and 4 percent for the past six months,” he said. As alternatives to foreclosures, lenders in Dubai have extended payment periods and developers allowed customers with several properties to return some of them. The absence of mortgage securitization gives U.A.E. lenders makes it easier for lenders to restructure loans than their counterparts in the U.S., where mortgage debt was often sold on to investors.

Foreign Banks

U.K.-based Standard Chartered Plc and HSBC Holdings Plc top the list of foreign banks providing mortgages in the U.A.E., according to Deepak Tolani, senior research associate at Al Mal Capital PSC.

“While it is not Standard Chartered’s preferred approach, foreclosure is a legitimate course of action should a borrower not meet their obligations,” the bank said in a statement. HSBC declined to comment on the issue when contacted by Bloomberg, while Islamic mortgage lender Amlak Finance PJSC didn’t respond to e-mailed questions.

Banks are unlikely to head to the courts to foreclose on properties en masse because of concerns that large numbers of repossessed properties on the market will drive prices lower, said Saud Masud, a Dubai-based real estate analyst at UBS.

While auctioning a few properties “will be easy,” hundreds or even thousands of foreclosure sales may draw buyers away from new and secondhand properties, Masud said.

‘Slippery Slope’

“It’s a slippery slope,” Masud said. “Mass auctions may reprice the property market in a meaningful way as investors prefer to pick real bargains in auctions.”

A cultural stigma attached to forcing people out of their homes has also deterred foreclosures. That may not protect speculative investors who helped drive prices up by buying several properties with the aim of selling at a profit soon after.

“The mortgage law has given clarity and certainty to the exact process that must be followed by anyone wishing to enforce a mortgage,” said Waugh, whose firm is currently handling fewer than 10 repossession cases.

Foreigner Population

Dubai’s population, which is about 90 percent expatriate, may drop by 8 percent in 2009 and another 2 percent in 2010, UBS AG estimated in March. Dubai’s immigration department doesn’t provide regular statistics on visas.

Citizens make up only about 20 percent of the overall U.A.E. population, which largely consists of workers from countries including Pakistan, the U.K. and Lebanon. Workers have one month to leave the country after their work visas are canceled.

Dubai first allowed foreigners to own property in 2002. That led real estate prices to quadruple in the following six years, helped by a growing expatriate workforce and speculation fueled by borrowing.

The U.A.E. last year scrapped a rule that automatically qualified homeowners in Dubai for a permanent residency visa. Owners of properties valued at 1 million dirhams or more are now required to renew residency visas every six months. About 65,000 residential units will be completed in Dubai by 2011 and the emirate needs to create a minimum of 100,000 white-collar jobs to satisfy oncoming supply, Nomura said on Oct 15. Deutshe Bank estimates that 30,000 units may be delivered by the end of 2010.

Faster Process

“When people talk about litigation in the Middle East, they’re concerned over the possible time it would take to obtain a judgment,” Waugh said. “The speed at which it appears judgments may be obtained under the mortgage law is a real, positive sign for banks.” The Barclays cases were filed in November, he said.

The U.A.E.’s central bank in October proposed reducing the time it takes for a loan to be classified as non-performing by half to 90 days. Banks “most probably” will be asked to comply during the first quarter of this year, said Sofia El Boury, a banking analyst at Shuaa Capital PSC. So far, no properties have been auctioned, according to Mohammed Sultan Thani, assistant director general at the Dubai Land Department. Requests may start pouring in this year as banks give up on other alternatives, he said.

“Amicable solutions are hard to reach when a buyer lost his job,” or when a property is worth less than the amount owed on it, Thani said.

Lending Swelled

Mortgage loans totaled 137.6 billion dirhams in July 2009, central bank data shows. About 25,000 to 30,000 mortgages have been taken in the U.A.E. with over 95 percent of them in Dubai, analysts say.

The central bank estimates that real estate accounts for about 13 percent of total loans in the U.A.E. Shuaa’s El Boury said the real figure is “much higher” and official numbers aren’t realistic “given the financing contributions to real estate construction and development in the U.A.E.” The new mortgage law applies to only some kinds of Islamic lending, Waugh said. Shuaa estimates about 25,000 mortgages were extended by Tamweel and its competitor Amlak alone. The two lenders, which control more than half of the U.A.E’s mortgage market, are set to merge this year. Shares of both companies have been suspended since November, 2008.

Negative Equity

The biggest risks to banks come from loans underwritten after 2007, which are “most probably in deep negative equity by now,” Moody’s Yacoub said. Also at risk are Islamic Istisna’ mortgages where a buyer doesn’t make any payments until the property is delivered, he said. Barclays said the court’s decisions will renew lenders’ faith in Dubai’s legal system, “which could result in bigger lending mandates specifically for mortgage business.”

Judging by the first cases, the process seems to be working, Al Tamimi’s Waugh said. “Like anything, there are a few teething problems that are being resolved, but the fact that we have obtained judgments so quickly is positive.”

Empty Houses Full Of Trouble

In the January 10th edition of the St. Petersburg Times, Michael Van Sickler and Jamal Thalji report on an ever increasing problem throughout the US. When a house is in imminent foreclosure or has been foreclosed upon, in many instances it is left abandoned. Besides becoming a burden for the bank, the community and the realtors that may be trying to sell the property, the house can be a source of crime and hazards. Squatters claim the empty homes as their new place to live. Thieves, who travel under the cloak of darkness, will store their ill gotten booty in empty houses during the day time.

Be vigilant when you are traveling in the neighborhoods where you sell homes. More importantly, be supportive of solutions that solve the problems of vacant homes. Can anyone say Short Sale?!


Modified Loans Can Dent Credit

In the Business Section of the St Pete Times (January 10th edition), James Thorner wrote a great article that surprised me. The scope of the article involved the negative effects of loan modifications on credit score. Prior to reading this article, I was always under the assumption that a loan modification had no impact on credit scores. Mr. Thorner reports that, "If you accept a modification through Making Home Affordable, you'll probably pay for it with a lower credit score. In some cases the impact could be as much as 100 points."

Note that this applies to people that are current on their payments!! Meg Reilly, spokesperson for the US Treasury indicates, "Borrowers, including borrowers who are are current on their loans but are asking for modifications based on imminent default, are certifying that they are unable to pay their mortgage and need government assistance. These borrowers are a greater credit risk than borrowers who are not in imminent default and it is appropriate that the additional risk be reflected in their credit profile."

So, buyer beware!




Whitney Ray from News Channel 7 in Panama City Beach has reported on 2 very sensitive subjects: Loan Modifications and Mediations with lenders.

Ms. Ray reports that after December 31st, one must be a licensed mortgage broker and hold a license from the state of Florida in order to do loan modifications. There are many companies that have jumped into the fray by setting up shop as loan modification companies. So, if any of your clients are considering loan mods, make sure that they are working with a licensed entity.

I knew about the new loan mod law, but hadn’t read much on mediations. In my opinion, this is a great step in helping people stay in their homes. As Ms. Ray reported, there have been successes when mediations have been put into place. I will be watching how this plan is rolled out and how it is implemented.

Foreclosure Rule Changes In Florida
Floridians facing foreclosure will ring in the New Year with a better shot at saving their homes.
Posted: 8:41 PM Dec 29, 2009
Reporter: Whitney Ray


Floridians facing foreclosure will ring in the New Year with a better shot at saving their homes. An estimated 500-thousand Floridians will be in some stage of foreclosure when the ball drops signaling the start of 2010. Help from the banks, the courts, and the state could help more people keep calling home, home.

The New Year will bring new tools for borrowers looking to renegotiate their loans. Attorney General Bill McCollum talked Bank of American into being more accessible.

“We will see a sizeable number of people; come the first of the year, in this state, on the ground trying to meet face to face with people.”

At the stroke of midnight on December 31st, no longer will loan modifying businesses be able to practice without a state licenses. Bill Spann, Chief of Staff of the Office of Financial Regulation, is already screening thousands of applicants.

“There were some complaints and it’s yet another portion of the industry that we are tightening up on.”

Borrowers in danger of losing their homes will have more opportunities to work it out with lenders. The state’s highest court is mandating mediation for people who want to stay in their homes.

Negotiations between the lender and the borrower will have to begin soon after foreclosure proceedings have been filed.

Marc Tapps of North Florida Legal Services represents 450 people trying to save their homes. Tapps says face to face meetings will help families stay in their homes.

“Every time I’ve gone to mediation and there’s been a lender rep there we’ve walked away with a deal.” And more deals being made, means more families get to stay in their homes.

More than 5-thousand businesses have applied for a license with the office of financial regulation. People caught modifying loans without a license could face five years in prison or a 5-thousand dollar fine.

A very interesting article was written that highlights one of the many reasons (that I have discussed) that banks don’t want to foreclose on houses. Simply put, foreclosures can ultimately shut a bank down. Something not mentioned in the article is that banks will tend to negotiate more on high end homes as compared to lower end (i.e. mortgaged) homes. Why you may ask? Two reasons:

1. Affordability – Banks know that if they take a $100,000 house back into their swelling inventory, 80% of the population can afford this house. So, the likelihood of the lender selling this house quickly is high. On the other hand, a much smaller percentage (lets say 3%) of the population can afford homes of $1,000,000 or more. So, if they take these homes back they run the risk of sitting on them for an extended period of time. When they sit on these houses, the value of the property (in today's market) goes down, they continue to pay for upkeep (maintenance, taxes, insurance etc.) and they expose themselves to potential liability (slip and falls in the house, vandalism etc.)

2. Insolvency – The reason banks are being shut down is because they become insolvent which means their performing assets are outweighed by their liabilities. These liabilities include houses that they take back in foreclosure. If a bank is owed $1,000,000 on a house that they foreclose on, the banks bottom line is affected, in the negative, by $1,000,000. A bank can take back ten (10) $100,000 homes and have the same NEGATIVE affect on their bottom line as One (1) $1,000,000 home. Do you get the picture?

As banks fail, we as tax payers also suffer. When the FDIC recently took over the failed Republic Federal Bank, it cost the FDIC (Us!) $122.6M. Multiply this by the other 132 bank failures that have occurred this year (the most since 1992) and you begin to sense the enormity of the problem. Short sales can be a solution to this problem. Call me and ask me how!

In Florida, Foreclosures are Fueling Bank Failures – 13 So Far This Year
December 12, 2009 by Staff

Miami’s daily newspaper called it a “Friday ritual” for Florida, another bank collapse, in a state that usually is in the top three for foreclosure filings or “underwater” mortgages.

And the two trends – bank shutdowns and foreclosures – are closely intertwined, regulators and analysts agree. Yesterday, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. said it sold Miami-based Republic Federal Bank’s branches, deposits and most of its assets to 1st United Bank of Boca Raton, just two counties to the north in South Florida. The failure is the 13th this year in Florida and is expected to cost the FDIC’s insurance fund $122.6 million.

“It (Republic Federal) failed because it experienced significant losses in its residential mortgage and commercial real estate portfolio,” FDIC Spokesman Greg Hernandez told The Miami Herald. “You couple that with a weak real estate market and it’s a formula for failure.”

So many bank failures have emerged in Florida, and neighboring Georgia, that the FDIC said it would open a “temporary satellite office” with about 500 workers in Jacksonville, Fla., located near Georgia’s border, to facilitate the closings of banks in both states.

This week, RealtyTrac, an online marketplace for foreclosures, reported that Florida posted the nation’s second highest state foreclosure rate in November, with one in every 165 properties receiving a foreclosure filing during the month. Florida took the No. 2 spot from California, which registered the nation’s third highest foreclosure rate — one in every 180 housing units falling into foreclosure.

A recent separate study of homeowners in negative equity nationwide showed that “underwater mortgages” are heavily concentrated in five states: Nevada (65 percent); Arizona (48 percent); Florida (45 percent); Michigan (37 percent); and California (35 percent). The Florida bank failure was one of three announced by the FDIC. All three cost the agency’s cash-strapped deposit-insurance fund a total of about $252 million.

Also on Friday, federal regulators seized Valley Capital Bank of Mesa, Ariz., and sold the one-branch bank’s deposits and assets to Enterprise Bank & Trust of Clayton, Mo.

Kansas regulators shut down SolutionsBank of Overland Park, marking the third bank to fail in Kansas this year. The FDIC sold the bank’s deposits, branches and assets to Arvest Bank of Fayetteville, Ark.

The 133 failures so far this year mark the largest number of bank collapses since 1992, when 181 lenders were shut down. Regulators and analysts expect the number of bank failures to remain high through next year.

Bob Tedeschi from the New York Times wrote a timely article on short sales. His observation is that they can take a ton of time. One factor that he cites involves 2nd and 3rd position lien holders that are holding out for more money than the the first lien holder will “allow”. I must ask each and everyone of you, as a real estate professional how do you handle it when a closing hinges on this scenario:

A second lien holder demands $40,000 when the 1st lien holder is only allowing them $3,000? Make the assumption that the buyer won’t bring $37,000 CASH to the table and the seller doesn’t have $37,000 either. Sorry, a prom note isn't the correct answer (do you really think a prom note is in the best interest of the home owner when there is another solution? I don’t!)

Some of you may “volunteer” their real estate commission but I would guess the majority of you can’t afford to give up that kind of commission. We deal with this EXACT situation on a monthly basis when we purchase short sales. No...I'm not going to give you the answer here. If your interested in learning how we deal with this predicament without harming the homeowner, buyer or requiring the realtor to contribute one red cent of their commission, call me or email me!

By BOB TEDESCHI
Published: December 11, 2009

SHORT sales — in which mortgage lenders agree to accept less than what is owed, allowing borrowers to escape foreclosure — were expected to grow easier this year after the Treasury Department proposed industry guidelines to navigate these complex transactions.

But that has not yet happened, industry experts say, largely because lenders and investors who hold the liens on second mortgages and home equity credit lines often fight for a larger piece of the short sale proceeds.

In late October, the Treasury Department officially adopted the guidelines, first proposed in April, which include suggestions for how these second-lien holders might be paid in such situations. Lenders and short sale specialists say the new measures could help when they go into effect in April 2010, simply because they offer some structure to a process that has often been chaotic.

Until then, lenders and foreclosure counselors say, homeowners can continue to expect a painfully slow process that sometimes fails, and can ultimately lead them back to foreclosure.

“It’s been tough sledding,” said David Sunlin, Bank of America’s real estate management executive. “We’ve been wanting to improve the short sale process, but our focus this year has been on retention efforts,” he said, referring to loan modifications and other foreclosure-avoidance initiatives.

Mr. Sunlin says that more borrowers are seeking short sales this year than in years past, thereby further straining the bank’s ability to handle them in a timely manner. He declined to provide specific numbers.

Real estate lawyers and mortgage industry executives say it can take as long as nine months to complete a short sale.

Lenders say they prefer loan modifications but will accept short sales because they lose less money on such transactions than they do in foreclosures, which often require them to carry the house for months before selling it.

Short sales still show up on a borrower’s credit history, but lenders are generally willing to offer them a new mortgage two years later, according to Mr. Sunlin. After foreclosures, borrowers typically must wait at least five years before a bank is willing to grant them mortgages, he said.

The Treasury guidelines focus on a range of elements in the short sale process. They suggest, for instance, that lenders offer second-lien holders up to $3,000 of the short sale proceeds, with Treasury reimbursing lenders up to $1,000 for doing so.

Under the guidelines, homeowners who are considering a short sale are encouraged to speak with their lenders early in the process about an acceptable sales price for the house, rather than simply contacting a lender when a buyer has made an offer.

And owners who complete a short sale will receive $1,500 from the federal government for relocation costs.

Travis Hamel Olsen, the chief operating officer for the Loan Resolution Corporation in Scottsdale, Ariz., which represents servicers and investors in short sale negotiations, said the Treasury Department’s incentives would do little to encourage second-lien holders to agree to a short sale. Many delinquent borrowers have second liens, mortgage industry executives say.

In some states, like Connecticut, New Jersey and New York, second-lien holders can pursue a borrower for the unpaid balance of a loan after a short sale. That point is often a major hurdle for parties in a short sale, especially if the second-lien holder knows the homeowner can liquidate other assets.

Against this backdrop is the ticking clock of a home sale negotiation.

Susannah Gillette, the director of program quality and impact at Neighborhood Housing Services of New York City, a housing counseling agency, said that one property in the Bronx had been through three prospective buyers since April. And in that short sale, she added, there is just one lien holder.

John Gittelsohn and Margaret Collins from Bloomberg wrote a very detailed article that describes banks increasing propensity to approve short sales. While lenders attempt loan modifications, it has been shown that approximately 25% of approved loan mods end up back in foreclosure. So, banks have 2 choices...either foreclose and carry the house in their inventory (thus weighing their bottom line down) or approve a short sale.

According to the writers, 40,000 short sales were closed during the first half of 2009. This represents a 6 fold increase of short sales as compared to the same period in 2008. What’s more striking, though, is that for every short sale there were 25 foreclosures started or completed!

While the Obama administration has offered financial incentives for lenders and servicers to close short sales, it is my opinion that banks are recognizing that a short sale is less expensive than a foreclosure. Some industry insiders state that a short sale can save a lender 10-15% when compared to a foreclosure. According to the article, losses on prime loans going through the foreclosure process averaged 49 percent versus 34 percent for a short sale as of Oct. 1, according to a Nov. 10 report by Laurie S. Goodman, senior managing director of Amherst Securities Group LP. For subprime loans, losses averaged 73 percent for a foreclosure compared with 59 percent for a short sale, Amherst reported.

Banks Take Losses on Short Sales as Foreclosures Soar
By John Gittelsohn and Margaret Collins

Dec. 4 (Bloomberg) -- Drew Schlosser tried for two years to sell his three-bedroom Punta Gorda, Florida, waterfront condominium for less than he owed on its two mortgages. The deal only went through last month when Wells Fargo & Co. agreed to take a $165,000 loss on the loans.

Even after he had an offer of $155,000 for the property, it took five months for the San Francisco-based lender to approve the purchase, a so-called short sale, in which the bank accepts less than the balance owed on a property. Schlosser said earlier offers had fallen through as bidders lost faith the bank would take less than the $320,000 in two mortgages.

“It was just kind of a mess,” said Schlosser, 31, a market research company director living in Estero, Florida. “You really have to get buyers who are patient.”

Banks are beginning to go along with short sales in increasing numbers, three years into a U.S. housing slump that pushed the economy into a recession and cut resale values by 30 percent from the peak in July 2006. Short sales almost tripled to 40,000 in the first six months of 2009 from the same period a year earlier. Yet for each short sale, there were 25 foreclosures started or completed in the first half of this year, according to data from the Office of Thrift Supervision and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.

“It’s really finally dawning on banks that they’re better off with a short sale,” said Richard Green, director of the Lusk Center for Real Estate at the University of Southern California in Los Angeles. “I think banks were in denial.”

Obama Pressure

Wells Fargo, Bank of America Corp. and JPMorgan Chase & Co. this year have hired and trained more staff, developed software systems for expediting short sales, and increased marketing of short sales to delinquent borrowers.

Banks are increasing such sales under pressure from the Obama administration and lawmakers who criticized them for favoring foreclosures and delaying short sales, Green said. Lenders and loan servicers also stand to receive up to $2,000 in incentives to close short sales under a Treasury Department plan unveiled Nov. 30.

“Judging by how slowly the modification plan is up and running, it doesn’t lend confidence this is going to jump start things,” Mark Zandi, chief economist with Moody’s Economy.com, said in a phone interview. “They’re saying the right things, but nothing so far suggests it’s going to work in a measurable way.”

The increase in banks agreeing to take losses on mortgages is helping some home buyers and real estate brokers.

‘Lucky Deal’

Pat Meislik, 63, started looking for a house in San Diego in March and said she felt locked out of the California market until short sales in her price range became available.

“There were times when I had looked at homes before and could only afford a condo,” said Meislik, an accountant and financial analyst.

Meislik closed on a three-bedroom “fixer upper” for $280,000 in May. “By the time it ended I felt lucky.”

Lender Countrywide Financial Corp., now part of Bank of America, lost about $150,000 on the $406,000 loan to the previous owner, said Meislik’s realtor Deborah Reed. Wells Fargo settled the second $47,252 mortgage on the home for less than 10 cents on the dollar, she said.

“The tide is turning,” said Reed, who works at Coldwell Banker in San Diego, where the price of a single family home has dropped 38 percent since the peak, according to the S&P Case- Shiller Home Price Indexes. “All of a sudden the banks are being more cooperative.”

More Short Sales

Reed said she completed four short sales in the past four months and the banks agreed to as much as $400,000 in losses.

Lenders have been reluctant to do such sales because they didn’t have procedures for employees to approve a financial loss for the company, said Alan White, assistant professor at Valparaiso University School of Law in Valparaiso, Indiana.

“A short sale requires somebody to stick their neck out and make a decision,” said White, an expert in consumer law and bankruptcy. “There are not good structures in place to incentivize losses.”

Bankers also have been slow to sign off on short sales because homeowner associations, mortgage insurers and second- lien holders may not agree to the terms of the deal, said Michael Frantantoni, vice president of single family research at the Mortgage Bankers Association.

Loan Modifications

The first choice for lenders has been to try to keep borrowers in their homes, offering loan modifications as an alternative to foreclosure, Frantantoni said. More than half of the modifications of delinquent mortgages re-defaulted within a year, according to a Sept. 30 report by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.

“The single biggest problem was the lack of a vehicle or mechanism at most banks to handle short sales,” said Walter Molony, a National Association of Realtors spokesman. “You could say they were shortsighted in dealing with the problem.”

Pressure is building to approve short sales as the number of delinquent mortgages has grown to 3.2 million and an estimated 7 million foreclosures loom in the next two to three years, according to Irvine, California-based RealtyTrac Inc., which compiles and sells U.S. mortgage delinquency data.

New Treasury Department guidelines for foreclosure alternatives scheduled to take effect in April 2010 will require lenders to consider borrowers for a short sale on their primary residence 30 days after missing two consecutive payments on a modified loan or after the borrower requests a short sale.

Treasury Plan

The Treasury Department would pay up to $1,500 for a homeowner to relocate, $1,000 to loan servicing companies that accept a sale and a maximum of $1,000 to help settle a second mortgage or subordinate lien. A lender must agree to release the borrower from all liability for repayment for the mortgage, under the Treasury plan.

In July, Wells Fargo began mailing notices to delinquent borrowers advising them that short sales might be an option to avoid foreclosure.

“When we determine that a loan is not affordable for the customer -- either because a modification was denied or failed - - we obtain the value of the property, run it through our loan decision tool and then send a letter to the customer advising them of our short sale program, including the short sale price we are willing to take on the property,” Debora Blume, a spokeswoman for Wells Fargo Home Mortgage said in an e-mail.

‘Pick a Pay Loans’

Wells Fargo is focusing on delinquent borrowers in Florida and California homeowners with “Pick-a-Pay” loans originated by Wachovia Corp., Blume said. Wells Fargo acquired Wachovia in December 2008 and owns the “Pick-a-Pay” loans outright, said J.K. Huey, the bank’s senior vice president overseeing short sales and bank-owned properties. That allows the company to approve a short sale without consulting investors or parties that can hold up transactions.

“Pick-a-Pay” mortgages have among the highest rates of negative equity, because borrowers could select their monthly payments, often paying less than the interest, with the difference added to the principal. That formula means that total loan debt was increasing at a time property values were falling.

Wells Fargo held $87.8 billion of such loans as of Sept. 30, down $7.5 billion from the end of last year. Wells Fargo Chief Financial Officer Howard Atkins said on an Oct. 21 earnings call that the bank is reducing the number of loans with “negative amortization potential.” As of the end of the third quarter, 26 percent of the loans in that portfolio now have minimum monthly payments that fully cover the interest due so that the total principal does not grow, up from 16 percent at the end of last year.

As of Sept. 30, Wells Fargo had modified 43,500, or 22 percent, of the distressed loans to reduce borrowers’ payments, Atkins said.

Reaching Out

JPMorgan doubled the number of staff trained to handle short sales after adding 5,000 people since Jan. 1 to deal with distressed mortgages, said Thomas Kelly, a spokesman for the New York-based bank’s home lending division.

Chase services 10.3 million mortgages worth $1.4 trillion, according to Kelly. Of its portfolio, Chase reported 422,000 loans more than 60 days delinquent, about one third of which were in loan modification programs, according to a Nov. 10 Treasury Department report on the Obama administration’s Making Home Affordable Program.

“We’re reaching out to people who are struggling with the Obama loan modifications or our own,” Kelly said. “Approaching customers is a very recent phenomenon.”

Bank of America, the nation’s largest loan servicer, had one of the lowest loan modification rates, with 14 percent of problem loans in trial workout plans as of Oct. 31, according to the Obama Administration.

The Charlotte, North Carolina-based bank started a “cooperative short sales” program in October and may close its first short sale through the program this month, said Dave Sunlin, senior vice president for foreclosure and real estate management.

Pay-Option Mortgages

Many are borrowers with pay-option adjustable-rate mortgages issued by Countrywide Financial Corp., Sunlin said. BofA bought Countrywide, once the nation’s largest mortgage originator, for $4 billion in stock in 2008.

Short sales benefit a neighborhood because they clear out stagnant properties that may have an adverse effect on values, said Sean Shallis, a senior real estate strategist with Weichert Realtors in Hoboken, New Jersey. Shallis has one home with bank approval for a short sale and three others waiting approval on the same street in Jersey City with views of the Manhattan skyline.

“In every case we had multiple offers from people who had plenty of money to put down,” Shallis said. “Americans are out there still buying homes and trying to move it along.”

Cutting Losses

Short sales also help the bank, because foreclosed properties lose more value when they are vacant or a homeowner vandalizes a house on the way out, Sunlin said.

“We typically expect a 10 to 15 percent decrease of loss severity with a short sale,” Sunlin said.

Losses on prime loans going through the foreclosure process averaged 49 percent versus 34 percent for a short sale as of Oct. 1, according to a Nov. 10 report by Laurie S. Goodman, senior managing director of Amherst Securities Group LP. For subprime loans, losses averaged 73 percent for a foreclosure compared with 59 percent for a short sale, Amherst reported.

“The loss severity of short sales is lower but it’s not low,” Goodman said.

For a borrower’s credit history, a short sale is typically reported as “settled” and considered as severe as a foreclosure, said Maxine Sweet, vice president of public education for Experian PLC, the world’s largest credit-reporting company. The impact of a short sale on a credit score is similar to that of a foreclosure. It may drop a credit score of 780 to 620, according to Minneapolis-based FICO Corp.

Hardship Letter

For sellers like Drew Schlosser, who bought 10 properties in Florida as investments during the housing bubble, getting a short sale was a relief even if the process was difficult.

Schlosser said he had to provide Wells Fargo a hardship letter, demonstrating that his financial situation merited a short sale. He also had to provide pay stubs, bank account information and past tax returns. To avoid fraud, the bank also required evidence that the transaction was an arms-length sale and not to one of his relatives, he said.

“They don’t agree to do it because you’re upside down,” Schlosser said. “If they think you can pay for it they’re not going to let you out of it.”

Kathleen Howley and Dan Levy wrote a very interesting article regarding short sales in the Luxury arena (they define this as properties that are mortgaged over $1M). They point out that people that have mortgages in excess of $1M are defaulting at TWICE the rate of people that have other mortgages. They attribute this to falling values, job losses and the fact that few if any of the new government programs address these types of delinquent mortgages. Also, the value of peoples investment portfolios have taken a beating in the last year. Many rely on this income to pay bills.

Comments in the article also point to discretionary income that is being spent on these houses. Meaning that many of these properties are 2nd and 3rd homes. Owners cant justify laying out the cash in an attempt to save anything but their primary home.

Last year the percentage of mortgages in excess of $1M that were delinquent 90 days or more was 4.7%. The same rate this year is 12%. These numbers are according to data from First American CoreLogic Inc., a Santa Ana, California-based research firm. What this tells me is that the higher end properties are falling victim at a much higher rate than lower priced homes. According to Scott Simon, managing director at Pacific Investment Management Co., a Newport Beach-based investment firm, "The reason the low end stopped falling is because the government stepped in with affordable loans. There is no political will to bail out a million-dollar house."

We are seeing more and more high end homes come on the market that are overleveraged. We are also seeing lenders giving higher discounts on these homes because they can’t afford to take them back in their inventory. On the flip side, we are also seeing many savvy buyers scooping up these properties at very affordable prices. SO, if you are not addressing the high end market, you need to!

Luxury Homeowners in U.S. Use 'Short Sales' as Defaults Rise
Homeowners with $1 million-plus mortgages are defaulting at almost twice the U.S. rate and many are turning to short sales


By Kathleen M. Howley and Dan Levy

(Bloomberg) — Homeowners with mortgages of more than $1 million are defaulting at almost twice the U.S. rate and some are turning to so-called short sales to unload properties as stock-market losses and pay cuts squeeze wealthy borrowers.

"The rich aren't as rich as they used to be," said Alex Rodriguez, a Miami real estate agent with JM Group USA Inc., whose listings include a $2.9 million property marketed as a short sale because the price is less than the mortgage, leaving the bank with a loss. "People have reached the point where they can't afford the carrying expenses of a $2 million home."

Payments on about 12 percent of mortgages exceeding $1 million were 90 days or more overdue in September, compared with 6.3 percent on loans less than $250,000 and 7.4 percent on all U.S. mortgages, according to data from First American CoreLogic Inc., a Santa Ana, California-based research firm. The rate for mortgages above $1 million was 4.7 percent a year earlier.

As defaults on the biggest mortgages rise, borrowers such as Steve Holzknecht are turning to short sales to exit loans that now are larger than the market value of the house. In such a transaction, the lender agrees to accept less than a 100 percent payoff on a mortgage to expedite the property's sale.

Holzknecht, 53, last month cut the asking price for his 7,280-square-foot home in Kirkland, Washington, by $550,000 to $1.25 million, lower than the balances of his two mortgages. Holzknecht, the former owner of Four Suns Inc., a Seattle luxury homebuilder that went out of business two months ago, constructed the Craftsman-style home in 2000. He declined to identify his lenders or the amount he owes.

COMMON PLIGHT
"It's not uncommon to see this situation on the high end of the market—homes selling for less than it would cost to build them," said Holzknecht's agent, Joe Flick of Roanoke Group in Seattle. The property came on the market eight months ago priced at $1.85 million, he said.

Porter Michael Peterson, a 33-year-old linebacker for the National Football League's Atlanta Falcons, bought a mansion near Tampa, Florida, four months ago for $1.1 million—almost half the amount of the mortgage taken out by the sellers three years earlier, according to real estate records. Reggie Roberts, a spokesman for the Falcons, didn't return a call seeking comment.

Short sales almost tripled to 40,000 in the first six months of 2009 from the same period a year earlier, according to data from the Office of Thrift Supervision. The bank regulator doesn't break out short sales by size of mortgage.

UPSIDE DOWN MORTGAGES
"You are just starting to see the tip of the iceberg with luxury short sales," said Adrian Heyman, owner of Property Advisors, a real estate broker in Scottsdale, Arizona. "A lot of wealthy people are upside down in their mortgages and they just can't afford the second or third vacation home anymore."

There are 114,000 home loans of more than $1 million, according to First American. About a quarter of all mortgaged homes in the U.S. have loan balances bigger than their current value, known as being upside down or underwater, the data company said.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average lost more than half its value as it tumbled to a 12-year low in March. The number of U.S. households with a net worth of more than $1 million, not counting primary residences, fell to a five-year low of 6.7 million last year from a record 9.2 million in 2007, according to Spectrem Group, a Chicago-based consulting firm.

The financial-services industry was among the hardest hit by the recession. While Goldman Sachs Group Inc. set aside a record $16.7 billion in the first nine months of the year for employee bonuses, some Wall Street executives will see pay cuts, according to Johnson Associates Inc., a New York-based compensation-consulting firm.

DISTRESS
Year-end bonuses for people at hedge funds, asset-management firms and insurance companies probably will drop an average 20 percent, the firm said.

"There's a lot of distress," said Tracy McLaughlin, co-owner of Morgan Lane Real Estate in Ross, California, north of San Francisco. "You have hedge-fund guys whose funds evaporated and a year-and-a-half later they're still not working."

The entry-level segment of the housing market was aided this year by an $8,000 first-time buyers tax credit that pushed resales to a 6.1 million annual pace in October, the highest since February 2007, the National Association of Realtors said in a Nov. 23 report.

President Barack Obama signed a bill last month extending the program into next year. The new version keeps the first-time buyer benefit and makes a smaller credit available to some move-up buyers. It can't be used for homes priced above $800,000.

LUXURY MARKET LEFT OUT
The Federal Reserve set out in January to lower fixed mortgage rates by purchasing $1.25 trillion of bonds backed by home loans. The 30-year fixed rate for so-called conforming loans that can be bought by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac dropped to an all-time low of 4.71 percent in the week ended Dec. 4, according to McLean, Virginia-based Freddie Mac, the second-largest U.S. mortgage financier. The rate rose to 4.81 percent last week.

The Fed purchases haven't affected the high end of the market because they exclude so-called jumbo loans. Mortgages above the $729,750 limit set by Congress for the nation's highest-priced markets cost almost 1 percentage point more than conforming loans, according to Keith Gumbinger, vice president at HSH Associates, a mortgage-data company in Pompton Plains, New Jersey. That's quadruple the historic spread.

"There is no refinance market for you if you are underwater and outside the Fannie and Freddie framework," Gumbinger said. "High-end neighborhoods are all suffering from the same problems of diminished income at a time when there is little equity to work with."

TRAPPED BY MARKET
Masoud Bokaie, co-founder of engineering firm BORM Associates Inc. in Irvine, California, owes $2.6 million on a 3,664-square-foot house with marble floors and granite counters about 10 miles (16 kilometers) away in Newport Beach. He's waiting to hear whether lenders Luther Burbank Savings and Wells Fargo & Co. will approve a short sale.

He received an offer last month "close to" the loan balances, said Shirley Cameron, his agent at Coldwell Banker Platinum Properties in Irvine, who declined to specify how much. Bokaie said he doesn't want to pay $7,000 a month in net costs including the property's mortgages and taxes when real estate values in the area continue to tumble.

"What's the point when the market is going in the other direction?" Bokaie said in an interview.

The U.S. median home price was $173,100 in October, 25 percent lower than its July 2006 peak, according to the National Association of Realtors. Prices fell 7.1 percent from a year earlier, the slowest pace of the year.

MORE DECLINES EXPECTED
"The reason the low end stopped falling is because the government stepped in with affordable loans," said Scott Simon, managing director at Pacific Investment Management Co., a Newport Beach-based investment firm that runs the world's largest bond fund. "There is no political will to bail out a million-dollar house."

Luxury home prices probably will drop another 5 percent before reaching a bottom in September 2010, according to Sam Khater, senior economist at First American.

Those declines may lead to losses on jumbo mortgages that dwarf the "haircut," or discount to full value, that banks take on short sales or foreclosures of moderately priced homes, said Rodriguez, the agent with JM Group in Miami.

"When the bank takes a loss on a $3 million property it's a lot bigger than the loss on a home with a $150,000 mortgage," Rodriquez said.

Tami Luhby of CNN Money reports on what many of us thought but didn’t actually know. Only 4% (which represents just over 31,000 homeowners) of troubled home owners have received LONG TERM relief from mortgage modifications. A proportionate number of people have been denied long term help due to reasons outside the control of lenders/servicers (i.e. people not making payments, not supplying the necessary paperwork etc.) The $75B plan called for helping 4,000,000 people!

Only about 4% get long-term mortgage help
Servicers provide permanent modifications to 31,382 troubled borrowers, according to first report issued by Treasury Department. An equal number have been denied.

By Tami Luhby, CNNMoney.com
Last Updated: December 10, 2009: 6:22 PM ET

Is Obama's foreclosure rescue plan working?

Homeowners in trouble are having mixed results applying for President Obama's foreclosure prevention plan. CNNMoney.com readers tell us their tribulations and triumphs trying to get their loans modified or refinanced.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Only about 4% of troubled borrowers have received long-term help under the Obama administration's foreclosure prevention program, Treasury officials said Thursday.

A nearly equal number of trial modifications have been denied permanent assistance, the report showed. The reasons include not making monthly payments on time, not submitting all the necessary paperwork and not qualifying for reasons such as insufficient income.

The report, the first comprehensive tally of permanent modifications made, shows that loan servicers have converted 31,382 people from trial adjustments to long-term assistance as of Nov. 30.

But 30,650 people in trial modifications have been denied, according to Treasury officials.

The dearth of permanent modifications has fueled concerns that the $75 billion plan will fall far short of its goal to help up to 4 million delinquent homeowners.

The number of troubled borrowers currently in trial modifications rose to 697,026, up from 650,994, a month earlier.

"Our focus now is on working with servicers, borrowers and organizations to get as many of those eligible homeowners as possible into permanent modifications," said Phyllis Caldwell, chief of Treasury's Homeownership Preservation Office.

Banks and the administration have come under fire in recent months as delinquent borrowers languish in trial modifications. Lawmakers lambasted servicers and Obama officials at a congressional hearing Tuesday for not doing more to help homeowners facing foreclosure.

Last week, the administration announced it was ramping up its oversight of loan servicers' conversion operations, sending in SWAT teams to break up any logjams, and requiring banks to submit updates twice daily on their efforts. Administration officials called financial executives to Washington this week to urge them to quicken the conversion pace.

"We're not satisfied yet with how this program is unfolding," said Treasury Assistant Secretary for Financial Stability Herbert Allison at the House Financial Services hearing. "The servicers have a lot of work to do, and we're holding them accountable for their performance."

While the permanent modification figures are disappointing, there is still time for the Obama administration to turn the program around, said Alan White, a law professor at Valparaiso University. But he would like to see a big increase in the numbers in the next month or two.

"Treasury is aware there is a problem," White said. "We'll see if they are able to do something about it."

Thursday's announcement came hours after a report showed the foreclosure crisis might be mitigating somewhat. Foreclosure filings fell by 8% in November, the fourth consecutive month of declines, according to RealtyTrac, an online marketer of foreclosed properties.

Under the president's plan, delinquent borrowers are put into trial modifications for several months to make sure they can handle the new payments and to give them time to submit their financial paperwork. Once the modification becomes permanent, servicers, investors and homeowners are eligible to receive thousands of dollars in incentive payments.

If they qualify for a long-term modification, borrowers can keep making the lower payments for five years, after which time the interest rate is set at the rate at the time of the adjustment, or about 5% today. Borrowers in modifications are saving an average of more than $550 a month.

Loan servicers say they are having trouble getting the necessary documents from borrowers.

Some 375,000 people should be eligible to receive long-term relief by year's end. But only one-third of homeowners who have made at least three trial payments have submitted all the needed forms, Treasury officials have said. Some 20% have not submitted any paperwork. Banks and government agencies have hired outside companies to knock on borrowers' doors to assist them with completing the paperwork.

Homeowners, however, maintain that their financial institutions are constantly losing the paperwork.

Donna Belanus, who just made her fourth trial payment to Wells Fargo, has repeatedly faxed her financial information and hardship letter to her loan servicer after being told her file was incomplete. The Elkhorn, Wis., resident was told a month ago that she'd receive a decision soon, but she's still waiting.

"If you give them everything, they should have an answer," said Belanus, who saw her monthly payments drop nearly $350 under the trial modification. "I don't want to lose my home because they take too long. It's uneasy not knowing what's going to happen."

A Wells Fargo spokesman said Belanus' file is complete and is in the review process. She should be notified of a decision within 45 days.

Once their files are complete, borrowers may be denied long-term help if they don't meet the program's criteria.

At JPMorgan Chase (JPM, Fortune 500), for instance, some 29% of borrowers offered trial plans did not make the required payments and are not eligible for permanent modifications, the bank reported. Another 51% have made the three required payments but have not provided all the needed paperwork.

The bank has launched a program to call borrowers 36 times, reach out by mail 15 times and make at least two home visits to retrieve the required forms.

About 20% have met all the criteria and the majority are expected to be put in long-term modifications soon, the bank said.

So far, some 4,302 borrowers at Chase have received permanent modifications, while another 16,131 have been approved for long-term help. The servicer has offered trial modifications to 199,033 borrowers.

"We continue to work very hard to convert customers from a trial modification to a permanent modification that lowers their monthly payment, but it has been a struggle," said Charlie Scharf, head of retail financial services at Chase.

Al Yoon has delivered yet another very interesting article regarding short sales. While the government has offered incentives to lenders and servicing companies in the past, this is the first attempt to limit the amount of time a lender has to respond to a short sale offer.

HAMP (Home Affordable Foreclosure Alternatives Program) allows mortgage servicers 10 days to “approve or disapprove a request for a short sale.” This is a very noble cause and I truly hope it works. What I don’t understand is what the penalties will be if they don’t approve or disapprove the short sale within 10 days of submittal.

What's interesting is that junior lien holders are still open to demand more than what is allowed by senior lien holders. HAMP speaks to an “aggregate cap of $3000 for junior lien holders.” However, if the 2nd lien holders don’t want to accept the $3000 they can continue to negotiate. I guess that’s what good lobbyists will do for you!

Treasury sets guidance to simplify "short sales"

By Al Yoon
Mon Nov 30, 6:58 pm ET

NEW YORK (Reuters) – The U.S. Treasury on Monday set long-awaited guidance on a plan for mortgage companies to speed "short sales" of homes and other loan modification alternatives to stem a rising tide of foreclosures.

The Home Affordable Foreclosure Alternatives Program provides financial incentives and simplifies the procedures for completing short sales, a growing practice in which a lender agrees to accept the sale price of a home to pay off a mortgage even if the price falls short of the amount owed, according to an announcement on the Treasury's website.

Guidelines address barriers that have often sidelined short sales by setting limits on the time it takes a bank to approve an offer, freeing borrowers from debt and capping claims of subordinate lenders. The incentives, first announced in May, expand on the government's Home Affordable Modification Program, known as HAMP, that has seen limited success in lowering payments for distressed homeowners. The Treasury earlier on Monday stepped up pressure on mortgage companies to make permanent the 650,000 trial modifications they have started.

"While HAMP program guidelines are intended to reach a broad range of at-risk borrowers, it is expected that servicers will encounter situations where they are unable to approve" or offer a modification, the Treasury said in its announcement.

Financial incentives for completing short sales or similar deed-in-lieu transactions -- in which the deed is simply transferred to the lender -- include a $1,000 payment to servicers, and a maximum of $1,000 to go to investors who sign off on payments to subordinate lien holders, the Treasury said. Borrowers would receive $1,500 in relocation expenses.

Short sales are favored by real estate agents and community groups over foreclosure because they can preserve the borrower's credit rating and leave the property in better condition than when a homeowner is evicted. While primary lenders typically realize steep losses, their recovery is typically far better than under foreclosure.

But short sales have been frustrating for borrowers and real estate agents, often hung up by negotiations with multiple lien holders and mortgage insurance companies. Real estate agents have complained that sales fall through as lenders bicker over the sales price, what they should receive from the proceeds, and whether the borrower will be held accountable for the debt in the future.

Among requirements, mortgage servicers have 10 days to approve or disapprove a request for short sale, and when done the transaction must fully release the borrower from the debt.

It also prohibits mortgage servicing companies from reducing real estate commissions on the sale, a practice that has dissuaded many agents from taking short sale listings.

In one of the most contentious issues gumming up negotiations between lenders, the guidance caps the aggregate proceeds to subordinate lien holders at $3,000.

Second lien holders in recent months have begun demanding more money from the first lender, seller, buyer or agent in exchange for releasing their claim, agents have said. Because primary lenders would face larger losses in a foreclosure, some subordinate lenders have felt empowered, the agents said.

The largest second-lien holders are Bank of America Corp, Wells Fargo & Co, JPMorgan Chase & Co and Citigroup Inc.

Second lien holders may proceed with a short sale outside of the Treasury program, if they felt the cap was too low, a Treasury official said in October.

"If there was a short sale program that didn't recognize the second lien holder position, it could have pretty damaging consequences for the industry," Sanjiv Das, chief executive officer of CitiMortgage, said in an interview last week.

Alejandro Lazo of the LA Times has written an article that will be sure to raise some eyebrows. In this foreclosure heavy environment many people don’t understand the consequences of simply walking away from a mortgage and allowing the lenders to foreclose. It’s not like you used to hear it where people simply “turned in their keys” (in fact I don’t think it was ever as simple as that!). Foreclosures can have dire impacts on individuals.

An obvious effect of a foreclosure is on your credit score. If you have a foreclosure on your record, the likelihood of you being able to purchase a house with lender financing in the near future is remote (this TYPICALLY stands true for a “deed in lieu”........if you don’t understand what I mean, call me or email me).

Homeowners who have their house foreclosed upon also run into the very real possibility of secured deficiency judgments. After foreclosure a bank can secure a judgment by garnishing wages, stripping bank accounts and/or liening other properties. The banks ability, however, to go after judgments vary from state to state......another reason to seek counsel.

Suggest to your clients that they seek counsel that understands foreclosure defense. Make sure that these attorney's are speaking to your clients about options they may have PRIOR to starting the short sale process.


Letting your home go into foreclosure does have consequences
By Alejandro Lazo
November 29, 2009


As job losses mount and Americans are faced with mortgage payments they can no longer afford, many are asking: Should I stay or should I go?

Bailing out on your home loan and opting to rent may make economic sense in some circumstances, particularly if you are saddled with a big mortgage payment on a home that has dropped steeply in value. But there are serious consequences -- financial, legal, emotional and ethical -- attached to the decision.

"There is no angle that you can look at that situation and think it is a great idea," said Bruce McClary, a spokesman for ClearPoint Credit Counseling Solutions. "It should be saved as the very last option that you have available, and you should look at every possible alternative."

Turning your back on your home and your mortgage can ruin your credit score even if it is already tarnished by a default on your house note. That could complicate other future financial transactions, including renting a new place and buying a car.

Nevertheless, some say such drastic action should be reserved as an option of last resort, particularly with the number of Americans still "underwater," or owing more on their mortgage than the home is worth. About 21% of U.S. households in single-family residences found themselves in this situation, Zillow.com reported this month.

Glenn Kelman, chief executive of the online real estate brokerage, contends that giving up should be an option.

"I think there are a lot of people who don't walk away from their house for moral reasons that are economically irrational," he said. "The problem is that we live in a reputation-based society, and people will track you down and never trust you again."

So be ready for that. And also be aware that your credit is not the only thing at risk.

J. Scott Bovitz, a Los Angeles bankruptcy attorney, said a distressed borrower should be prepared for a host of potential legal and tax consequences.

Banks in California can pursue two routes of foreclosure, judicial and nonjudicial, he said.

In a nonjudicial proceeding, which is the most common for someone who owns a home as the primary place of residence, the lender can't come after you for the money you still owe. A judicial foreclosure, though less common, can result in a debtor still owing the bank money even after the home is taken back.

Even if you escape your lender, Uncle Sam may still come after you. The Internal Revenue Code considers foreclosure a forgiveness of debt and therefore taxable income. If you are insolvent -- your debts are more than your income -- then you could be forgiven that debt, Bovitz said, but some folks might still face taxes after foreclosure. And that can come as a surprise.

Gail Cunningham, a spokeswoman for the National Foundation for Credit Counseling, said those homeowners who think they might face a financial shock, such as losing a job, need to seek housing counseling early on. The counselors shouldn't charge a fee for their services and should be approved by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

"The sooner the better, because the longer you wait, the deeper and more complex the problem becomes," she said.

Walking away should be considered only if another agreement can't be reached with your lender such as a loan modification or selling the house short of the balance of your outstanding mortgage, Cunningham said.

Some experts have contended that because of the sharp increase in foreclosures during the housing bust, Fair Isaac Corp., which developed the nation's most widely used credit-scoring formula, FICO, may reconsider how it weighs such transactions in the future.

"The question that FICO will be asking itself is, is a foreclosure in 2008 and 2009 the same as a foreclosure in 1998, 1999 or 2003 and 2004?" said Todd J. Zywicki, a bankruptcy expert at George Mason University School of Law in Arlington, Va.

"This is a once-in-a-century real estate market."

Fair Isaac spokesman Craig Watts said that though it is too soon to tell how the company might account for the complex mortgages offered during the boom and how they changed consumer behavior, he cautioned that foreclosures still serve as good predictors of consumer behavior in the eyes of FICO and many lenders.

"There is nothing about the recession that changes the dynamic that the score is designed to evaluate," Watts said. "Yes, there are more people going into foreclosure, but they are not going into foreclosure in dramatically different ways than they have in the past."

Julianne Pepitone of CNNMoney.com reports on a very disturbing fact: 1 in 4 mortgages are underwater. This doesn’t mean that 1 in 4 mortgages are in foreclosure it just means that the mortgages don’t support the underlying debt. Some people will continue to hang in there and pay on a mortgage that doesn’t equate to what the underlying properties are worth. Others will choose not to pay. Ms. Pepitone reports , “The majority of underwater mortgages are heavily concentrated in five states that have particularly suffered from the housing bust: Nevada, at 65%; Arizona, at 48%; Florida, at 45%; Michigan, at 37%; and California, at 35%.”

It looks like foreclosures are going to be with us for a long time. The question is, “What are you doing about it?”

1 in 4 mortgages 'underwater'
Report shows 10.7 million borrowers are stuck with homes that are worth less than the mortgages they owe.
By Julianne Pepitone, CNNMoney.com staff reporter
Last Updated: November 24, 2009: 12:19 PM ET


Foreclosure plague: It's spreading

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- In a sign that more foreclosures could be on the horizon, 23% of people with mortgages owe more than their home is worth, according to a report released Tuesday.

Almost 10.7 million U.S. mortgages were "underwater" as of September, said research firm First American CoreLogic.

Another 2.3 million homeowners are within 5% of negative territory, the report said. The two figures combined comprise almost 28% of all residential properties with mortgages.

Negative equity, also called an "underwater" or "upside down" mortgage, has become more common as home values plummet. The report is closely watched because borrowers who are underwater are more likely to be foreclosed.

Would you walk away from your house?
Foreclosures have been rampant for some time, but lately the tide of decay had seemed to be slowing -- so Tuesday's report could dent optimism for the housing market over the next few months.

On the other hand, the trend that turned so many mortgages upside-down -- falling home prices -- has reversed the past six months. The S&P/Case-Shiller HomePrice Index has reported two consecutive quarters of increasing prices.

If home prices continue to go up or, at least stabilize, fewer mortgage borrowers will find themselves underwater in the coming months.

CoreLogic changed its methodology for the third quarter -- now it accounts for payments that reduce principal, and it no longer assumes home equity credit lines have been maxed out. Using the old method, 33.8% of borrowers would have been underwater in the third quarter compared with 32.2% in the previous quarter, according to a CoreLogic spokeswoman.

State totals: The majority of underwater mortgages are heavily concentrated in five states that have particularly suffered from the housing bust: Nevada, at 65%; Arizona, at 48%; Florida, at 45%; Michigan, at 37%; and California, at 35%.

These five states have been especially beleaguered because of a high rate of prime loans that went bad. Many of those loans were option-adjustable rate mortgages, in which borrowers could choose to make minimum payments that were so low they did not even offset the interest being accumulated.

When that accumulated debt reaches a certain point -- usually 10% to 25% more than the original principal -- the option-ARMs loans are recast into fixed-rate mortgages. When that happens, many borrowers cannot afford the new payments.

Christopher Rugaber from the Associated Press reports on troubling new on our economy. While jobless claims have fallen about 22% since spring, companies are still reluctant to hire new employees. They are trying to do more with less. What is more troubling is that the number of homeowners that are either in foreclosure or have missed at least one payment hit a record high for the 9th straight quarter. Fixed rate loans accounted for nearly 33% of past due loans as compared to 22% during the same time last year. This tells me that foreclosures are touching all parts of our economy.

New jobless claims unchanged, foreclosures rise
By CHRISTOPHER S. RUGABER (AP) – 3 days ago

WASHINGTON — The number of newly laid-off workers seeking unemployment benefits was unchanged last week, remaining above the level that would indicate the economy is adding jobs.

New jobless claims have fallen about 22 percent since spring. But companies' reluctance to hire is weighing down the housing market — and the economy's fledgling recovery.

The proportion of homeowners with a mortgage who were either behind on their payments or in foreclosure hit a record high for the ninth straight quarter, the Mortgage Bankers Association reported Thursday.

Driven by rising unemployment, fixed-rate loans to people with good credit accounted for nearly 33 percent of new foreclosures last quarter. That compares with just 21 percent a year ago.

The Labor Department said first-time claims for jobless benefits amounted to a seasonally adjusted 505,000 last week. That was the same as the previous week's revised figure, and it matched analysts' expectations. A year ago, there were 533,000 initial claims.

The four-week average, which smooths out volatility, fell for the 11th straight week to 514,000, the lowest level in nearly a year.

Some economists said the report was an encouraging sign that job losses in November will decline from last month's total. Employers cut a net total of 190,000 jobs in October, down from 219,000 the previous month.

Economists at Deutsche Bank are forecasting that net job losses will fall to 125,000 in November. But the economy needs to add about 125,000 jobs a month just to keep the unemployment rate from rising.

Separately, the Conference Board said its index of leading economic indicators rose 0.3 percent last month, less than analysts had expected. That indicates a slow, bumpy recovery next year.

The index forecasts economic activity by measuring jobless claims, stock prices, consumer expectations, building permits for private homes, the money supply and other data.

A gauge of consumer expectations, which are dropping as unemployment continues to rise, weighed down the index. Uneasy consumers likely will curtail their spending, which powers about 70 percent of the U.S. economy.

The stock markets fell in morning trading. The Dow Jones industrial average dropped about 160 points, and broader indexes also declined.

While the steady decline in claims is evidence that firings are decreasing, most economists say weekly claims would have to fall to about 425,000 for several weeks to signal that the economy is actually adding jobs. Some economists put the number higher, around 475,000.

Even as claims are falling and the economy has started growing, the unemployment rate is rising. It jumped to 10.2 percent in October from 9.8 percent, the highest level in more than 26 years, the government said earlier this month.

The economy grew at a 3.5 percent annual rate in the July-September quarter, the government said last month. But many economists expect growth to slow in the current quarter. Recent reports on industrial production and housing have been disappointing.

The number of people continuing to claim benefits, meanwhile, dropped by 39,000 to 5.6 million for the week ending Nov. 7, the department said. The figures on continuing claims lag behind initial claims by a week.

But the continuing claims figure does not include millions of people that have used up the regular 26 weeks of benefits typically provided by states. They are receiving extended benefits for up to 73 additional weeks, paid for by the federal government.

Nearly 4.2 million people were receiving extended benefits in the week ended Oct. 31, an increase of 120,000 from the previous week.

Congress added 14 to 20 weeks to the extended program Nov. 6, the fourth extension since the recession began and the longest total extension on record. That boosted the total number of weeks a person could collect unemployment to as much as 99 in the hardest-hit states.

But more than 1 million people will run out of unemployment benefits in January unless Congress quickly extends federal emergency aid, a nonprofit group said Wednesday. The November extension didn't address an underlying problem: The emergency unemployment compensation program, including all additional weeks, expires at the end of this year.

Some employers are continuing to lay off workers. In a securities filing Thursday, AOL said it plans to cut about a third of its work force once it is spun off from the media conglomerate Time Warner Inc. That would amount to nearly 2,300 of the roughly 6,900 workers at the struggling Internet company.

Hartford, Conn.-based health insurer Aetna Inc. this week said it will cut 625 jobs, or nearly 2 percent of its staff, and will make a similar job cuts in the first quarter of 2010 due to the lagging economy and the potential impact of health care reform.

Several state governments also announced layoffs, including Pennsylvania, Indiana and Maryland.

AP Business Writer Tali Arbel in New York and AP Real Estate Writer Alan Zibel in Washington contributed to this report.

Joseph Williams from Boston.com reports that another government concern is running out of money. FHA acknowledged that they are burning through their cash reserves at an astronomical rate. What this means is that they will request more money from the government which will fire up the printing presses and devalue our dollar. It will be interesting if FHA’s policies towards first time home buyers will be effected.

According to Mr. Williams, “The FHA does not make loans itself, but insures against default. Borrowers are willing to buy the insurance because FHA-backed loans require down payments of only 3.5 percent of the purchase price. But Donovan said the agency is considering raising the minimum down payment, as well as insurance premiums for borrowers - moves that would mean fewer people would be able to get loans. When credit markets seized up at the height of the financial crisis, Donovan said, FHA picked up the slack and now holds as much as 30 percent of the mortgage market - including guaranteeing more than half of all home loans held by African-Americans and nearly 60 percent of mortgages held by Latinos.

Overall, it insured nearly a quarter of all new loans made this year, including about half of all loans to first-time homebuyers. The FHA backs about 5.3 million mortgages, up from about 4 million three years ago.”

Scary facts!

FHA runs low on cash, fueling bailout concerns
Fears hit if prices slip; But audit sure of solvency
“It is absolutely critical that going forward, we build that cushion back up,’’ Housing Secretary Shaun Donovan said.
By Joseph Williams

WASHINGTON - The Federal Housing Administration, which propped up the collapsing housing market last year, acknowledged yesterday that it has drained its cash reserves to dangerously low levels, heightening concerns that it might need a taxpayer bailout.

The agency, which guarantees loans for many first-time homebuyers, could be hit if housing prices lose ground or if a new wave of mortgage defaults, triggered by double-digit unemployment, crashes into the market in the coming months.

If the FHA runs into financial trouble, it could make it more difficult for borrowers to get loans, particularly first-time buyers.

Housing Secretary Shaun Donovan said while an independent audit showed that the FHA burned through its backup fund as defaults and foreclosures spiked during the mortgage crisis, the analysis also showed that the agency should remain solvent under “most economic scenarios,’’ including higher unemployment and mortgage defaults.

Nevertheless, “it is absolutely critical that going forward, we build that cushion back up,’’ Donovan said at a news conference.

The FHA’s cash reserves have plummeted to $3.6 billion, compared with $685 billion in outstanding insured loans - a ratio of 0.53 percent that is far below the 2 percent required by Congress and a fraction of the 6.4 percent reserve ratio in fiscal 2007. In Massachusetts, FHA backs 44,000 home loans, slightly less than one percent of its national loan portfolio. The Bay State’s default rate is 0.56 percent of loans, less than half the national rate of 1.25 percent.

While agency officials say they have kept high standards on the creditworthiness of borrowers, critics say those homebuyers are not immune to default - particularly if job losses keep soaring and the recent increase in home prices doesn’t stick. About 17 percent of FHA borrowers are at least one payment behind or in foreclosure, compared with 13 percent for all loans, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association.

“Real risks remain to the taxpayers,’’ said Sarah Rosen Wartell, a former FHA official who is now executive vice president of the Center for American Progress, a Washington think tank. The agency, she said, “has a lot of serious problems’’ as it navigates an uncertain housing market and a fragile economy.

Donovan and FHA Commissioner David Stevens said they are carefully monitoring economic conditions.

Representative Barney Frank of Massachusetts, chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, said he’s concerned that higher unemployment could curtail the agency’s ability to back loans. “We’re just going to keep watching them carefully’’ to determine whether they need congressional help to stay above water, he said.

Frank also said he has proposed taking $2 billion from funds repaid after the Wall Street bailout to “lend money to people facing foreclosure because of unemployment. I am pressing hard to get that done. I believe we can substantially reduce that second wave if we do that.’’

The FHA does not make loans itself, but insures against default. Borrowers are willing to buy the insurance because FHA-backed loans require down payments of only 3.5 percent of the purchase price. But Donovan said the agency is considering raising the minimum down payment, as well as insurance premiums for borrowers - moves that would mean fewer people would be able to get loans.

When credit markets seized up at the height of the financial crisis, Donovan said, FHA picked up the slack and now holds as much as 30 percent of the mortgage market - including guaranteeing more than half of all home loans held by African-Americans and nearly 60 percent of mortgages held by Latinos.

Overall, it insured nearly a quarter of all new loans made this year, including about half of all loans to first-time homebuyers. The FHA backs about 5.3 million mortgages, up from about 4 million three years ago.

Yesterday, RealtyTrac Inc., a foreclosure listing firm, reported that the number of households that received a foreclosure-related notice fell in October, the third straight monthly decline. “Foreclosures are still far higher than we want them to be, but we do appear to have them on the right path now,’’ Donovan said.

“None of us has a crystal ball. None of us knows what the economy is going to look like,’’ he said. “The issue is, we need to return those reserves to a higher level to protect taxpayers’’ and avoid asking Congress for bailout money.

The FHA audit “is a major wake-up call for FHA and the lending community, but no reason to panic,’’ John A. Courson, the Mortgage Bankers Association’s president and chief executive officer, said in a statement yesterday. The reserve requirement, he said, was set up to make sure the agency could survive “the stress of a major housing and mortgage event. It is safe to say that FHA is facing that type of event today.’’

Can you say, “Law Suit”?! The high volume of foreclosures must have gotten to Chase! They actually admitted to accidentally selling a couples house at a foreclosure auction! Chase says that they are working with the couple to rectify the situation.

An observation here is that the different departments within a lender/servicing company may not be speaking with one another. The involvement of an attorney may have also helped matters.

Bank Accidentally Sells Couple's Home
Bank Cites 'Confusion' For Error

PHOENIX -- Despite being up-to-date on their modified mortgage payments, an Arizona couple found that their bank was foreclosing on their home, KPHO-TV reported. "You work so hard. Put a lot of money down on your house. You pay your taxes. You pay your mortgage, and it's all stolen from you," said Jeff Zerner, the homeowner. He and his wife, Yanthy, found out about the foreclosure when the new owner posted a notice on their door Nov. 4. "I get this notice that says you have five days to vacate the property," he said. "So I called the number (on the notice) and I say, 'Who are you?' and they say, 'We're the legal owners of this house. It went up for foreclosure.' "

Just days before, the Zerners thought their home was safe. They had finished their trial modification with Chase and were led to believe they would qualify for a permanent modification.

"We paid Chase several hundred dollars, which they accepted in good faith," said Zerner. "I feel extremely ripped off." Chase officials admit they made an error by selling the house.

They told KPHO-TV in a statement, "We apologize for the confusion over the modification actions and the parallel foreclosure steps Chase takes as a precaution. We have reached out to Ms. Zerner to discuss where we go from here."

Loan modifications and foreclosures are parallel processes. In the Zerners' case, the sides failed to communicate with each other to halt the foreclosure until it was too late. Banks can buy back homes they've sold in foreclosure or rescind the sale. They can also pay to relocate a family to another home.

What will they think of next?!! Alejandro Lazo from the Los Angeles Times reports that Fannie Mae has decided to turn landlord! They continue to burn money (they just requested an additional $18B (that’s Billion) from our government last week (remember...the government owns them!)) at an extraordinary rate. Some feel that this move is an attempt to generate some income in a down market. Others speculate that Fannie doesn’t want to bring more bank owned properties into their swollen inventory. What's hypocritical about this program is that the government strictly prohibits the lease back (to the home owner) of a property that is purchased in short sale.

On the other hand, this MAY turn into something positive for those that are about to lose their homes. The program is designed to keep people in their homes by exchanging their deeds for a year long rent back of their home. There are several conditions of the program (click on the link to read the entire article to understand what these conditions are.)

As a suggestion, if one of your clients or friends is in a predicament where they may lose their house to foreclosure, suggest that they ask the lender/servicing company that they send their mortgage payments to who owns their loan. If the owner/investor is Fannie Mae, they want to explore this lease back option.

Fannie Mae to allow borrowers in foreclosure to lease back homes

The mortgage giant's move is part of an attempt by lenders to keep a wave of foreclosed properties from slamming a housing market that has shown some signs of recovery.

Fannie Mae's move to let some people losing their homes to foreclosure lease back their homes is part of an attempt by lenders to keep a wave of foreclosed properties from slamming a housing market that has shown some signs of recovery. (Joe Raedle / Getty Images / October 1, 2009)

By Alejandro Lazo
November 6, 2009


Mortgage giant Fannie Mae said Thursday that it would throw a lifeline to some people losing their homes to foreclosure by allowing them to lease those properties back for up to a year at market rental rates.

The move is the latest in a series of steps by lenders trying to manage inventories of foreclosed homes on their books in an attempt to keep a wave of properties from slamming a housing market that has shown some signs of recovery.

The news came as Fannie Mae reported a net loss of $18.9 billion in the third quarter ended Sept. 30, compared with a $14.8-billion loss in the second quarter and a $29.4-billion loss in the third quarter last year.

The latest loss pushed Fannie Mae's government regulator Thursday to request $15 billion from the Treasury Department. It was the fourth time the Washington company had drawn on its federal financial lifeline since Fannie and its sister firm, Freddie Mac, were seized and placed under government stewardship.

By reducing the supply of cheap foreclosures on the market, Fannie Mae's Deed for Lease Program would add to other efforts by the federal government to aid the housing market, analysts said.

Jay Ryan, Fannie Mae's vice president of equity investments, said the program would help to stabilize neighborhoods. The firm said Thursday that the program would qualify only those borrowers who had exhausted other options, such as a loan modification.

"If you keep more people in their homes, it's better for the community, and hopefully fewer vacant homes on the market will help stabilize those communities," Ryan said. "If someone still wants to live in their home, be it for the kids wanting to stay in the school district or the family wanting to remain embedded in their community, this gives them another opportunity."

The program also would allow Fannie to produce some income from the properties -- many worth less than their mortgages, or "underwater" in industry terms -- as it waits for home prices to recover.

"This is a very wise business decision because these loans are underwater, and they are not going to get all of the money," said Richard Green, director of the USC Lusk Center for Real Estate. "Fannie has an incentive to keep the homes reasonably maintained because they are going to want to sell them one day."

Bruce Marks, a housing activist and critic of the lending industry, said the program was a distraction from efforts to push lenders to modify loans.

"Their mission is to provide homeownership and yet now they want to get into the landlord business. It is outrageous," said Marks, executive director of the housing nonprofit Neighborhood Assistance Corp. of America. "The issue has to be to force these banks to restructure mortgages, not let them off the hook."

Fannie didn't say how many homeowners it expected would qualify for the program. To participate, a borrower must agree to convey all interest in a property to the lender. The company recorded 1,996 people agreeing to such a transaction in the first nine months of the year, according to a filing Thursday with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In California, Fannie held $475 billion in loans at the end of the third quarter, of which 5% were "seriously" delinquent.

The home must be a borrower's primary place of residence. A borrower-turned-tenant would have to document that the new market rental rate is no more than 31% of his or her gross income and be released from any subordinate liens on the property.

The efforts mirror a program by Freddie Mac of McLean, Va., which offers month-to-month leases to people who have lost their homes to foreclosure. Tenants must agree to allow the home to be shown to potential buyers and allow the company to market it for sale.

Fannie's program isn't for everyone. Some borrowers would be better off pursuing loan modifications or other solutions.

Scott Hempel, 38, said he was underwater on a home he owns in Riverside but he has kept up his mortgage payments. Hempel, a production manager for Dow Jones & Co. in Dallas, said he was forced to relocate to his new job in October 2007. He tried to sell his Riverside home but the plunge in home values made it impossible. Hempel said he would like to conduct a short sale -- selling the home for less than the value of the mortgage -- but was told by Bank of America that Fannie guidelines required him to be in default.

"I could walk away and do what everybody else is doing, but I am trying to get out of the house without doing that," Hempel said.

To make matters worse, he said, he will lose his $90,000-a-year job as the plant he works at winds down its operations.

A Bank of America spokeswoman confirmed that Hempel was denied a short sale based on Fannie Mae's guidelines.

Complaints that lenders won't negotiate with borrowers unless they go delinquent on their mortgages have been common during the unfolding housing bust and economic meltdown. The loan modification plan sponsored by the Obama administration this year was designed to encourage lenders to reach out to borrowers heading for trouble before they actually defaulted.

alejandro.lazo@latimes.com

Dick Hogan from News-Press.com points out what many may not know. Foreclosures are not limited to the $100,000 homes that are always in the news. More and more we are seeing higher priced homes that entering the foreclosure scene. Many homes lie partially built. Due to the size and complexity of these homes, they can take a longer time to complete as compared to their spec home brothers. As a result, buyers simply don’t move in because their home is already “upside down.”

So whether you are buying or selling, don’t forget higher priced homes.

Upscale foreclosures rise in Lee County
Expensive homes become affordable
DICK HOGAN • DHOGAN@NEWS-PRESS.COM • NOVEMBER 3, 2009


That expensive house you covet might not be quite so expensive in a few months.

Experts say more high-end foreclosures are being filed, more houses are under construction and fewer people are moving in — all adding up to pull down prices in Lee County.

“The cream is coming,” predicted Jeff Tumbarello, director of the Southwest Florida Real Estate Investment Association, which compiles monthly statistics on foreclosures.

In October, there were 1,628 foreclosures filed, down 40 percent from October 2008’s all-time high of 2,665.

But the foreclosures in recent months, though fewer in overall numbers, are showing signs that the middle class is starting to lose its houses. Tumbarello said, for example, a third of the houses that went into foreclosures over the past six months were pool homes.

That’s because the houses going into foreclosure now are increasingly in the higher range, said Brett Ellis, a real estate agent with Re/Max Realty Group in Fort Myers.

Less expensive homes are already at a rough balance of supply and demand, he said, but what constitutes a high-end house depends on the area: more than $100,000 in Lehigh Acres but closer to $200,000 in Fort Myers.

Kerry Collier, a real estate investor and broker, said she and two business partners bought a house in Estero that had been foreclosed on and will close on it this week for close to their $285,000 asking price.

But she said she expects houses even a little more expensive — about $300,000 or more in Estero — will be coming down in price soon.

“If you look at the MLS (multiple listing service), there’s a lot out there,” said Collier, the owner of Collier & Associates Real Estate and HomesByOwner.com.

Even as a wave of foreclosures approaches the market, new construction is actually increasing in Lee County, said Brad Hunter, who directs Metrostudy's market research operations in Southwest Florida.

In the third quarter, starts for detached single-family homes in subdivisions rose to 194 from 91 starts in the previous quarter, according to a Metrostudy report that came out last week. At the same time, vacant inventory rose from 703 houses to 728.

Builders have made reducing their inventories a priority over the past year, Hunter said, but “now it’s at a point where when a builder sells a house, they have to build a house just to have enough houses to sell.”

But those houses being built now will face a lot of competition from the foreclosures coming back onto the market, Hunter said. Up to now it’s been mainly subprime mortgages for inexpensive houses, but now prime loans are starting to show up.

“There’s still another wave of foreclosures coming and that will bring another round of price declines.” Hunter said. “Those homes will be a greater competitive threat to the homebuilders than the first wave.”

If this isn’t a timely article, I don’t know what is! The editor for the San Francisco Chronicle says it all, “Quiet as it's kept, if homeowners had more legal advice and legal power to negotiate with lenders, the foreclosure epidemic might have turned out to be as threatening as the common cold.” I have made mention of this many, many times before. It’s refreshing to hear it from others!

The editor also comments that, “(lawyers) have better success at negotiating with lenders and potentially finding workable solutions that avoid foreclosure.” Lawyers are also trained to decipher the garbage that is spewed out of some lenders mouths when it comes to the terms and conditions of approval letters.

Melanca Clark, counsel at the Brennan Center says that, "In (California), you'd need a lawyer to raise an affirmative claim about your foreclosure. And you'd need a lawyer to determine if the lender had predatory terms, or had induced you into a refinance you didn't need, as we're finding so many of them did, which could help you contest the foreclosure. An average homeowner isn't going to know something like that."

No matter where you are or who you are....sellers MUST HAVE Legal representation during the pre foreclosure process!

Those near foreclosure need law on their side
San Francisco Chronicle Editorial

As the nation's economic crisis drags on, we'll hear more and more about the financial and political mistakes that fueled it. But what about the legal mistakes?

Quiet as it's kept, if homeowners had more legal advice and legal power to negotiate with lenders, the foreclosure epidemic might have turned out to be as threatening as the common cold.

More than 8 million American families are expected to lose their homes to foreclosure over the next four years. Foreclosures destabilize families and depress entire neighborhoods' property values. Experts believe that they will be the major reason why it's going to take the housing market years to recover.

This is serious business. And yet the laws in most states don't take foreclosures very seriously. In 30 states, including California, mortgage holders who allege that homeowners have fallen behind in their payments can auction off their homes without the intrusion of any judicial process. In 33 states, including California, homeowners don't even have to be personally served with a foreclosure notice. Tenants have stronger protections.

Making matters worse is the fact that most homeowners don't have access to lawyers, who have better success at negotiating with lenders and potentially finding workable solutions that avoid foreclosure. According to a new report from the Brennan Center for Justice, cuts to civil legal aid programs have deprived poorer homeowners of representation during one of the most critical proceedings of their lives. Many counties don't keep this information, but they dug up information on the ones who do, and the numbers are staggering. Eighty-four percent of foreclosure defendants with subprime or nontraditional mortgages in Queens County, N.Y., went without full representation, for instance.

In California, which doesn't even have judicial proceedings for a foreclosure, having a lawyer is even more important if someone wants to save her house.

"In (California), you'd need a lawyer to raise an affirmative claim about your foreclosure," said Melanca Clark, counsel at the Brennan Center. "And you'd need a lawyer to determine if the lender had predatory terms, or had induced you into a refinance you didn't need, as we're finding so many of them did, which could help you contest the foreclosure. An average homeowner isn't going to know something like that."

Fortunately, California legislators have recognized that there's something wrong with the status quo - especially because few states have been hit harder by the foreclosure crisis. The Sargent Shriver Civil Counsel Act, signed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger last month, establishes a two-year pilot program to provide counsel for poor people in crucial civil cases like child custody and housing. California is the first state to create a program of this kind.

"We're very hopeful that other states will follow what California is doing," Clark said.

When it comes to homeowner protections, though, California still has a lot of work to do.

The Legislature should start by expanding access to the courts for people who are facing foreclosure. Sacramento will whine about the broken budget as a reason to avoid this, but one of the best ways to increase tax revenue is to help people stay in their homes.

Once these homeowners have their day in court, they're going to need access to legal counsel. That means - yes - increased funding for civil aid clinics. But the state could also lobby Washington to lift the onerous federal funding restrictions on the Legal Services Corp. (The corporation is the major source of federal funding for civil counsel for the poor.) These restrictions have tied many legal clinics' hands, and lifting them wouldn't cost taxpayers a dime.

It's more important than ever for California to re-examine its foreclosure statutes and make these changes. The "crisis" has passed. The pain is just beginning.

Tom Kelly from the Herald Net publication wrote a very interesting article regarding bank owned financing. While we don’t purchase bank owned properties, I am sure many of you that are reading this are involved in bank owned properties (also known as REO’s). Apparently, several lenders require buyers of their properties to finance their purchase (if they aren’t paying cash) through them! Mr. Kelly points out that this is, apparently, legal.

So the lesson learned is that if you are going to purchase a bank owned property ask the listing agent if the lender/owner has any requirements for you or your buyer to use their institution to fund the transaction. It may save them a ton of time in not having to get preapproved by a lender that may not be allowed to fund the deal. Hope this helped!

Lenders pickier on foreclosure financing
By Tom Kelly

Remember when lenders were content to sell foreclosed homes to any qualified buyer? Their popular message was “we’re in the lending business, not in the real estate business.”

With the large number of real-estate-owned homes overwhelming most mortgage lenders and driving many others out of business, it’s curious that some are making stringent demands on how foreclosed homes are financed.

A few lenders are even requiring that they supply the financing for any foreclosed property in their portfolio.

The policy took Tom Lasswell, a mortgage professional with Guild Mortgage in Lynnwood, completely by surprise. Lasswell recently had a pre-approved borrower who found a bank-owned property. While the buyers were highly qualified, the lender who owned the property let it be known that two other parties were interested in the parcel.

“Our clients’ offer was accepted, but only if they got a loan from the lender who held the property,” Lasswell said. “If they wanted the home — which was perfect for them — they had to get a loan with that lender and close with them. If our clients did not comply with those terms, the lender with the foreclosure would move on to the next person in line.”

No specific loan terms were discussed or promised. The potential buyers simply had to accept that the financing would come from the lender holding the property.

“I’ve known some builders that require borrowers to be pre-approved or pre-qualified through their affiliate companies or relationships, but the borrower has not been required to use those services as a part of the contract. They have always been able to choose.”

Is it even legal for a bank to ever dictate where a borrower obtains financing?

Joseph Vincent, general counsel for the state Department of Financial Institutions, said a lender can require a borrower to secure financing when the lender is acting as the “seller” of the property.

It is a violation of the Federal Anti-Tying Law for a bank, its holding company or affiliate to condition a loan on the purchase of specific property. However, it is not a violation if the institution is telling any would-be buyers that, as seller, it will not sell the property to them unless they obtain a seller-financed loan for that purpose.

However, if the bank, savings association or one of its subsidiaries or its holding company required more than the seller-financed loan, that extra requirement could be an illegal tying arrangement, according to Vincent.

For example, a bank sells you an office building it owns through foreclosure, the terms of which are 20 percent down payment and an 80 percent bank-financed purchase loan. So far, so good. But the terms also require that, as a condition of purchase, you agree to use Property Manager X or Remodeling Consultant Y. The bank, savings association or one of its subsidiaries or its holding company has a beneficial ownership interest in or less-than-arm’s-length relationship with Property Manager X or Remodeling Consultant Y. This would likely be an illegal tying arrangement, Vincent wrote.

Vincent cited the legal case Sharkey vs. Security Bank & Trust Co., where a bank’s tying arrangement constituted a violation because the bank required a customer to purchase real estate from the bank as a condition for obtaining a loan. The court sided with the customer, and rejected the bank’s argument that the customer must prove the arrangement was “anti-competitive.”

When 2008 finally came to an end, there were approximately 871,000 foreclosed, or bank-owned homes, in the United States, up from 414,000 at the close of 2007. More than 5 percent of all performing mortgages were 60 or more days delinquent, pointing to a potentially precarious situation.

TransUnion, the huge credit and information-management company, expects that percentage to double in 2009 as more adjustable rate mortgages and Option Arm instruments click in to their adjustment mode. These adjustables, approximately $321 billion strong and scheduled to re-set before 2012, could well drive the number of real-estate-owned homes to more than 2 million. Most of these properties are vacant, creating a drag on neighborhoods and lessening the desire of many other homeowners to hang on.

Do Mortgage Lenders Make More Money When a Loan Goes into Foreclosure?

I read, with interest, an article by Ilyce Glink. In the article titled, “Do Mortgage Lenders Make More Money When a Loan Goes into Foreclosure?” she points out that loan servicing companies ( companies that collect monthly mortgage payments and distribute them to investors) make MORE money by foreclosing when compared to doing loan modifications. In addition, Ms. Glink states, “The report examined foreclosures made from 1995 through 2009 and found that loan servicers make more money by offering forbearance (where the homeowner is given a specific period of time to not make payments in an effort to regroup financially) or payment plans than by cutting principal or offering reduced interest rate payments.” So for those of you who wonder why they just don’t slash the principal.......it’s all about the money!

Two other interesting passages from the article are, "Loan modifications inevitably cost the servicer something. A servicer deciding between a foreclosure and a loan modification faces the prospect of near certain loss if the loan is modified, and no penalty, but potential profit, if the home is foreclosed."

Moreover, the report found that financial incentives offered to mortgage servicers by the government to help homeowners avoid foreclosure do not equal the profits servicers make through foreclosure. The lack of "third-party oversight allows servicers to pursue foreclosure instead of effective loan modifications that would benefit homeowners as well as investors." Credit rating agencies and bond insurers do monitor servicers, NCLC found, but they, too, generally push for foreclosure instead of loan modifications.”

Also recall that roughly 60% of home owners who do modify their loans, end up in foreclosure within 6 months. The reason is that the modifications that are done do not provide home owners with a sustainable solution but rather a simple band aid. While loan modifications make great fodder for the politicians, there are many forces acting against them.

Do Mortgage Lenders Make More Money When a Loan Goes into Foreclosure?

Glink, Ilyce - Real Estate Matters
October 30, 2009


Have you fallen on hard times? Do you need your mortgage loan modified?

Just flip on the television or radio, or surf the Internet, and you will find countless ads placed by companies offering to help you get a loan modification.

The only problem is, it's tough to know if they truly will be able to help you. Why? A new study reveals that servicers actually make more money when a loan goes into foreclosure than if it is modified.

In fact, mortgage servicers -- companies that collect monthly mortgage payments and distribute them to investors -- have found it's cheaper to foreclose on homeowners than to offer loan modifications that would benefit homeowners and investors, according to "Why Servicers Foreclose, When They Should Modify, and Other Puzzles of Servicer Behavior," a new report from the National Consumer Law Center (NCLC).

As every good investor knows, net profit isn't just about the rate of return. It's also about how well you hold down the expenses associated with that investment.

Most homeowners assume that foreclosure is a money-losing proposition for lenders and investors. There's a lot of talk that with a short sale, a lender might only lose 10 to 20 percent of an investment. But with foreclosures, lenders might settle for 20 to 30 cents on the dollar.

These numbers would seem to point mortgage lenders and investors toward doing more loan modifications.

But the way the system has been set up, lenders, investors and mortgage servicers may have different priorities, and they are certainly compensated in different ways.

As the recent RealtyTrac foreclosures number showed, the third quarter of 2009 had the highest number of foreclosures on record.

"The country is in the midst of a foreclosure crisis of unprecedented proportions. Millions of families have lost their homes, and millions more are expected to lose their homes in the next few years," noted Diane E. Thompson, an attorney with NCLC and author of the study.

Thompson argues that reduced home values and high unemployment are pushing homeowners to the edge financially.

"With home values plummeting and layoffs common, homeowners are crumbling under the weight of mortgages that were at best only marginally affordable when made," she explained.

The report examined foreclosures made from 1995 through 2009 and found that loan servicers make more money by offering forbearance (where the homeowner is given a specific period of time to not make payments in an effort to regroup financially) or payment plans than by cutting principal or offering reduced interest rate payments.

According to the report, "Loan modifications inevitably cost the servicer something. A servicer deciding between a foreclosure and a loan modification faces the prospect of near certain loss if the loan is modified, and no penalty, but potential profit, if the home is foreclosed."

Moreover, the report found that financial incentives offered to mortgage servicers by the gov ernment to help homeowners avoid foreclosure do not equal the profits servicers make through foreclosure. The lack of "third-party oversight allows servicers to pursue foreclosure instead of effective loan modifications that would benefit homeowners as well as investors." Credit rating agencies and bond insurers do monitor servicers, NCLC found, but they, too, generally push for foreclosure instead of loan modifications.

"The people who could change the way servicers are doing business -- Congress, the administration, and the Securities and Exchange Commission -- and the market participants who set the terms of engagement -- credit rating agencies and bond insurers -- have failed to provide servicers with the necessary incentives to reduce foreclosures and increase loan modifications," Thompson said.

The report suggests the following changes in order to encourage more loan modifications: regulate loan originations; mandate loan modifications before foreclosure; fund quality loan mediation programs; provide for principal reductions on existing loans through the Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) program and through bankruptcy reform; increase automated and standardized loan modifications for borrowers in default and provide a safety net for borrowers who do not qualify for a standardized modification; ease accounting rules for loan modifications to facilitate standardization and encourage long-term loan modifications; require loan servicers to be more transparent and uniform in how loan modifications are reported; and limit fees charged to borrowers.

Commercial: Is the other shoe dropping?
A commercial calamity may be upon us sooner than you think. As the author points out in the article titled, “Commercial: Is the other shoe dropping?” at the end of June 2009, Florida banks had $5.1B (that’s BILLION) in commercial and related loans on their books that were in default. That number was up 15 fold (15 TIMES) the same number in 2006. An even more astonishing number is that $530 BILLION in commercial loans (nationally) will be coming due in the next three years.

Here in lies the issue. Unlike residential loans that can be financed over 30 (and even 40 years), commercial loans are typically financed over 3 to 10 years. The end game after this period was to either sell or refinance the underlying notes. The issue that many commercial owners have is that by the end of their loan term, their properties have dropped in values which prohibits a quick sale (except via a short sale). It also prohibits a refinance for obvious reasons.

Well the guys and girls in the commercial lending sector have their own version of loan modifications. It is commonly known as the “extend and pretend” program where they will extend the existing loan lines for a short period of time. But....guess what? If the owner can’t afford the loan before maturity they wont be able to afford it after. In addition, more and more commercial owners don’t see the logic in paying off (or down) a note on a property that, in many cases, has dropped in value by millions.

So what happens? Owners walk and banks take back properties? Yes, this does happen. However, like their residential brethren, commercial loans can also be shorted. Ask me how.


Commercial: Is the other shoe dropping?

MIAMI – Oct. 21, 2009 – Commercial real estate vacancy rates in Florida have followed the state unemployment rate upward as it doubled in two years. But empty spaces and falling rental rates aren’t why there’s talk of a coming bust in commercial real estate.

For that explanation, turn to property values – down 35 percent since 2007, says Moody’s Investors Service – and the banks.

The fortunes of commercial real estate and Florida banks are joined at the hip.

Florida banks have $56 billion in loans for commercial real estate on their books – 34 percent of bank assets, according to FDIC reports.

They aren’t doing well. Severely distressed loans at Florida banks, as a percentage of assets, are 15 times what they were in 2006. At the end of the second quarter, Florida banks had $5.1 billion in commercial, apartment and construction and land development loans in default, up from $274 million in 2006, according to FDIC reports.

The worry is that commercial real estate owners won’t make good on the estimated $530 billion in loans maturing nationally in the next three years, triggering a new wave of bank failures and killing any budding recovery.

“A challenging situation right now. There’s no question about that,” says Bill Moss, senior managing director and Florida regional manager for CB Richard Ellis.

How we got here ...

The fallout

In the late 1980s, money from S&Ls fueled overbuilding. The culprit now, as in the residential market, is again easy credit, but this time it led to overvaluing, not overbuilding. The juice came in part from commercial mortgage-backed securities. Commercial property loans were bundled into securities sold as investments. Industry newsletter Commercial Mortgage Alert says such securities issues nearly tripled to $230.2 billion in 2007 from 2003.

Property prices inflated. At the peak in 2007, buyers were paying the highest multiples of a building’s rental income in at least 30 years. “Money was so accessible that people were buying buildings at ridiculous prices,” says Damien Madsen, a partner at Morrison Commercial Real Estate in Orlando. “When the music stops ... all of a sudden you’re owning something you overpaid for.”

Florida, with $2.1 billion in delinquent loans backing such securities, was third in the nation as of July, accounting for 8 percent of the national total, according to Horsham, Pa., credit-rating agency Realpoint. Agents for securities have filed foreclosure actions this year over properties ranging from a shopping center in Pembroke Pines to a warehouse in Miami.

The dynamic

Commercial developers and many buyers finance their purchases with interest-only loans for fairly short periods, three to 10 years, to be paid off with a balloon payment at the end. The traditional exits are to sell or borrow again. The sales door is as good as shut. The few buyers out there want bargains.

The question then becomes who will refinance the billions in commercial real estate loans maturing nationally in the next three years. Values have fallen so far that refinancing is problematic at best. Consider an office building bought at the peak for $25 million and financed with a $20-million loan, for an 80 percent loan-to-value ratio. If it’s now worth only $20 million, the owner’s equity is gone. A lender isn’t likely to refinance the full $20 million debt since it would amount to loaning 100 percent of the property’s value. The owner, down $5 million already, isn’t going to be eager to put in more equity.

Notice that the issue isn’t occupancy. “A lot of these projects that could be challenged by this are very successful projects - 90 percent occupied,” says Moss of CB Richard Ellis.

Seth Werner, CEO of Hollywood-based Cypress Creek Capital, for example, says his portfolio, assembled for $400 million, has an average leverage of 70 percent. Now lenders want to lend only 50 percent and want guarantees. “Most of us are not going to pay off the balance of the loans when they mature,” Werner says. “We’ll have to see when the deal comes to maturity whether it makes sense to extend or sit down and talk about a restructuring.”

The solution

The solution thus far has been for borrowers and lenders to agree on short extensions that have been described as “extend-and-pretend” and “kick the can down the road.” In the early 1990s, as commercial real estate values fell, lenders took over many failed projects and discounted rent or sold the failed projects to buyers who discounted rent – all of which only forced down the value of viable competing properties.

To avoid that cascade of falling values, says John Carey, managing partner at Whitehall Realty Partners in Jacksonville, “The feds have got to instruct the banks to be flexible.” Otherwise, “market values will plummet.”

In August, the Obama administration extended a bailout program to help the sector. Duane Stiller, president of commercial real estate owner and researcher Woolbright Development in Boca Raton, says lenders are only delaying the inevitable. Banks will have no choice but to clean up their books, breaking the impasse between buyers and sellers over values. Job growth – which usually lags in a recovery anyway – will at first just fill now-empty desks, not create enough demand to drive rental rates high enough to justify the levels of the 2007 peak and ease the refinance crisis. Industry insiders say it will be at least a year until the bottom is reached and a few years to sort out the wreckage. “It’s like after a hurricane – we’ve got a big mess to clean up,” Stiller says.

Around the state

Miami: A worsening outlook for Latin American economies isn’t good news. Scandal-plagued Stanford Financial left 90,000 square feet behind when it closed. Developer Tibor Hollo bought a 3-acre Brickell property for less than half the $70 million it fetched four years ago. The office vacancy rate is 15 percent. With trade falling, the industrial market is seeing the highest vacancies in five years. Retail is holding up.

Broward: The market has $147 million in distressed office property. Industrial vacancies have risen for 12 quarters, while one north Broward property sold for 55 percent of its 2005 price.

Orlando: With an overall 17.4 percent office vacancy rate, rents are stabilizing. The airport market is strongest. The industrial market, dependent in Orlando on storing retail goods and building supplies, is seeing the worst vacancies in a decade. The industrial vacancy rate was 14.3 percent in the second quarter compared to 9.5 percent the year before. The retail vacancy rate was up to 8.4 percent last year.

Palm Beach: At 22.5 percent, Palm Beach County has one of the highest office vacancy rates in the nation. Two new office buildings in Boca were completed empty. The industrial vacancy rate is 11.9 percent.

Tampa Bay: Being the back office for national companies works against the Bay area in an era of consolidation. The Pinellas office market is faring worse than Hillsborough’s. In retail, community centers are doing the worst with a 9.1 percent vacancy rate. The industrial vacancy rate is 8.9 percent.

Jacksonville: A minor miracle in Florida commercial real estate: In the second quarter, rental rates in the industrial market were down only 7 percent to 10 percent for Class A space and more space was actually leased than vacated. Not so in other sectors. Bank consolidation hurts as shown by an overall office vacancy rate of 19.9 percent. The retail rate is 10.6 percent.

Bay Area homes still taking a hit
The last article I commented on involved the increasing number of foreclosures in the Florida market. Not to be outdone, Northern California is weighing in with their own housing maladies.

Eve Mitchell from the Contra Costa Times noted a 116.4% rise in the number of homeowners that received a notice of default in September of 2009 compared to the same period last year. During the same period, the number of homes that were foreclosed on by banks decreased by 41.6%. Eve suggests that this decrease may be due to president Obama’s loan modification program. While don’t entirely I agree with her position, I hope she is correct. Unfortunately the lasting effect of these loan mod programs tend to be short lived. As many as 60% of these homeowners fall back into foreclosure after 6 months.

So from coast to coast foreclosures continue to plague our society. There are ways to help home owners through these trials and tribulations. If you are interested in learning more, call me or email me. Have a great weekend!


Bay Area homes still taking a hit
By Eve Mitchell
Contra Costa Times

More homeowners in the Bay Area received a notice of foreclosure — the first step in the foreclosure process — in September compared with a year ago while at the same time the number of foreclosed homes that became bank-owned properties declined. Last month, 3,916 homeowners received notices of default, a 116.4 percent increase from a year ago, but 2,484 foreclosed homes became bank-owned properties, a 41.6 percent decrease from a year ago.

The slowdown in banks taking back homes after homeowners fail to bring payments up to date is likely the result of loan modification programs that are in place, said Daren Blomquist, marketing and communications manager for www.realtytrac.com , which released to the report today.

"All of that did have the effect of somewhat bringing down the (bank-owned properties) as lenders tried to figure out if (borrowers) qualified for any foreclosure prevention programs," he said.

The Obama administration's loan modification program, which rolled out in March, has helped about 500,000 homeowners lower their home loan payments, federal officials announced last week.

But while the number of people losing their homes to banks is down from a year ago, there was an 8.5 percent increase from the second to third quarter in bank-owned properties, said Blomquist. In the three-month period ending in September, 4,260 Bay Area homes became bank-owned properties, compared with 3,927 in the three-month period ending in June.

That quarter-to-quarter increase is linked to the foreclosure process working its way through earlier loan modification and foreclosure moratoriums aimed at keeping people in their homes, Blomquist said.

"There is still pent-up foreclosure activity that needs to work through. So we would expect (bank-owned) numbers to continue to ramp up as lenders work through more of the loans and figure out if they qualify for a loan modification or not,'' he said.

The RealtyTrac report defines the Bay Area as Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, San Francisco and San Mateo counties.

Last month in the Bay Area, 3,107 homes, or 107 percent more than a year ago, entered the notice-of-trustee sale stage. That stage clears the way for a foreclosed home to be sold at an auction, either to a third-party or to the bank. In most cases, such homes end up becoming bank-owned properties.

Notice of trustee sales in the Bay Area stood at 7,937 in the third quarter, or a 22.5 percent increase from the second quarter. However, notices of default stood at 10,679 in the third quarter, a 3.4 percent decrease from the second quarter.

New Foreclosure Wave May Swamp Florida Market

Mr. Charles Smith, in the article titled, “New Foreclosure Wave May Swamp Florida Market” feels that more foreclosures are ahead in the Sunshine State. He acknowledges that there are signs of recovery but the growing wave of job losses, exotic mortgages and property devaluations continue to depress the market.

Ten percent of all loans were in foreclosure in August. An independent agency showed that there is an increasing number of loaned that are delinquent but not in foreclosure yet. These loans, unless brought current will contribute to an increase in foreclosures.

Houses are selling but at lower price points. The median price dropped to $142,000 in Florida which represents a 19% decline over last year. This phenomenon contributes to future delinquencies by causing a drop in market values in areas that are hardest hit by foreclosures.

It appears that short sales and foreclosures are going to be with us for quite a bit longer.


New Foreclosure Wave May Swamp Florida Market
News Service of Florida - Oct 24th, 2009

While Florida’s real estate market is showing some signs of life, industry watchers fear another major wave of foreclosures is poised to swamp the state.

With unemployment rising to 11 percent, home prices falling, and adjustable rate mortgages issued during the 2006 housing boom set to tick upward, the stage is set for more delinquencies, analysts said.

“We think there’s a lot of foreclosures that are just starting to make their way into the pipeline here,” said Amy Baker, coordinator of the Legislature’s Office of Economic and Demographic Research. “They really haven’t hit yet.”

A new report by the independent LPS Mortgage Monitor shows that 10 percent of Florida mortgages were in foreclosure in August – the highest rate in the country and almost triple the national average.

A steadily rising number of delinquent loans also have not yet plunged into foreclosure nationally, the report showed – hinting that plenty more homes could be headed that way in coming months.

LPS termed these troubled loans the “shadow foreclosure inventory,” and pointed out that it is double the number of actual of foreclosure starts. In Florida, one-in-five mortgages are in foreclosure or delinquency – almost twice the national average and the highest level in the U.S.

“Housing sales are rising,” said Tim Becker, director of the University of Florida’s Bergstrom Center for Real Estate Studies. “But foreclosures just put more homes back into the inventory of unsold homes. You’re not going to get Florida’s economy going again until you cut down this inventory.”

More than 1 million Floridians are currently out-of-work, with the construction industry among the hardest hit. Some 62,700 housing-related jobs have been lost in the past year, state officials said.

Becker said that declining home prices – while boosting sales for 13 straight months – are also contributing to the foreclosure rise. Owners whose home values have dropped significantly – leaving them “under water” – have no incentive to continue paying mortgages and may let their homes lapse into foreclosure.

Florida’s median home price for September fell to $142,000, state Realtors reported Friday. That’s down 19 percent from a year ago and $5,400 lower than Augusts' median sales price. Meanwhile, a backlog of foreclosures in Florida’s court system reduces the risk that these delinquent homeowners will be.

“You’re seeing more people employ the “put option,” with their mortgages,” he said. “They’re saying “put (the loan) back on the bank.” Still, homes are selling as prices drop – steering dollars into the state treasury through real estate transaction and sales taxes, although Florida officials acknowledge a $2.6 billion budget shortfall looms next year.

Realtors, though, said falling prices could spur an economic rebound by reigniting Florida’s population growth – which declined this year for the first time since shortly after World War II.

“It’s a buyer’s market right now,” said John Sebree, lobbyist with the Florida Association of Realtors. “Maybe people see these prices and say, `I don’t have to sell my home in Indiana to find a good deal in Florida.’”

Second foreclosure wave likely to hit commercial property

If I have said it once I have said it many times......take out the long board because the commercial short sale wave is coming! In my “travels” I am starting to hear that the “commercial lenders are becoming more reasonable when evaluating short sale offers.” What this means is that short sales (whether residential or commercial) are going to be with us for a long time. Let me know if you have any owners of over leveraged commercial properties.

Second foreclosure wave likely to hit commercial property

The economy and the real estate market are slowly bouncing back.

But experts fear that a second wave of foreclosures is rolling in and this time, commercial real estate is the target.

Broken fences, graffiti and trash litter a vacant lot near Central Expressway and Walnut Hill Lane in Dallas.

Forty two acres of rocky landscape, it was meant to be the foundation for a redevelopment vision filled with apartments, retail stores and restaurants.

But the vision crumbled.

"It's kind of an eyesore. I just would like them to do something, make some progress," said neighbor Charles McFarland.

The multi-million dollar project is now facing foreclosure and set to go to sale next month.

More vacant lots are going to pop up in North Texas and all over the nation.

The commercial real estate market is facing its own crisis, and it's a market worth trillions of dollars.

Over on Turtle Creek, a for lease sign stands on a site, where the plan was to build a boutique hotel.

Experts say developers are putting projects on hold or heading into foreclosure because of the economy.

"We are seeing more and more foreclosures. We are seeing circumstances that a person who owns the property can't make their interest payments or loan payments. The banks are working with them, but it's sad to report it's going to be an ugly scene," said SMU professor, Mike Davis.

Tough times are expected until 2011, according to Brad Crumpecker, a Dallas financial analyst.

"Everything right now with the credit markets for commercial real estate is sort of in limbo," he said.

Crumpecker says there's money to lend. It's just harder to come by and more expensive.

Lenders are tightening their belts, turning away developers with good credit.

"Even if you have been making your payments and you go to your bank for a refinance on your commercial real estate loan, it may well be that they don't have the capacity to refinance you," he said.

Experts say Texas is standing on better ground, compared to other states, because it didn't over build. However, there's a rocky road ahead.

Foreclosure Rate Rises 17 Percent

As compared to the 1st quarter of 2009, foreclosure rates rose 17% in the second quarter of 2009. This is despite foreclosure prevention plans implemented by the government and several lending institutions. Rising unemployment continues to be the culprit behind many of these foreclosures. The article also points out that Option ARMS (where a borrower picks their payment over a period of years) is also a contributing factor. When the low payment period ends, the higher payment oftentimes buries the borrower causing them to miss payments. The article points out that, “More than 15 percent of these types of loans were seriously delinquent during the second quarter, compared with 5.3 percent of all mortgages, according to the report, and 10 percent were in the process of foreclosure.

Foreclosure Rate Rises 17 Percent

The number of homes lost to foreclosures rose about 17 percent in the second quarter of this year despite the launch of an extensive government program aimed at helping borrowers save their home, according to government data released Wednesday.

Completed foreclosures reached 106,007 during the second quarter, compared with 90,696 during the first three months of the year, according to the report by the Office of Thrift Supervision and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, which regulates banks. Their quarterly report examines 64 percent of outstanding mortgages in the country.

The increase was primarily the result of various government and industry foreclosure moratoriums, the report said.

Efforts to keep borrowers in their homes increased during that same period, including the implementation of the Making Home Affordable plan. Under that plan, lenders are paid to lower a borrower's monthly payments. Government data has shown that since the program was launched in March, nearly 400,000 borrowers have been helped. The Obama administration aims to complete 500,000 loan modifications by November.

But even as that program ramps up, rising unemployment continues to hamper foreclosure prevention efforts. The level of foreclosure actions started during the quarter stayed steady, while the number of seriously delinquent borrowers -- those who had missed at least two payments -- increased 10 percent, according to the report.

The mortgage data "continued to reflect negative trends influenced by weakness in economic conditions including high unemployment and declining home prices in weak housing markets," the report said.

The report also reflected the risks still posed by hundreds of thousands of risky home loans known as option adjustable-rate mortgages, which reset to significantly higher payments. With these "option ARMs," also known as pick-a-pay loans, a borrower chooses how much to pay each month, often less than the interest due. But the payments on these mortgages eventually rise significantly, putting the borrower at risk of losing the home.

More than 15 percent of these types of loans were seriously delinquent during the second quarter, compared with 5.3 percent of all mortgages, according to the report, and 10 percent were in the process of foreclosure. "The risks of these loans and geographic concentration caused them to perform significantly worse than the overall portfolio," the report said.

Many mortgage modifications push payments .... higher

The talk of the town has been mortgage modifications. What this article points out that in many instances, the modifications leave the homeowner worse off for the long term.

The problem arises from lenders rolling all of the past due payments, interest, penalties etc etc back into what is owed. When the new mortgage amount is calculated it is oftentimes much higher than the original amount. This action does serve the purpose of keeping families in homes longer (which is good), but it burdens them with a new bill that is very difficult to handle. More and more, people slide right back into default with the higher payments.

The governments March initiative focuses on interest rate reduction rather than on principal reduction. The writer of this article suggests that this too contributes to the high volume of “re-defaults”. The programs are not focusing on permanent debt reduction but rather on a quick fix. The article states that 90% of modifications to date have strapped the borrowers with higher principal balances on their mortgages.

So while mortgage modifications can help some homeowners, all need to be cautious and fully understand the long term impact of a modification. They can’t simply focus on the instant gratification that they receive from a modification.

Many mortgage modifications push payments .... higher

Tens of thousands of financially strapped homeowners who have asked lenders to lower their mortgage payments are instead winding up with higher monthly payments and larger debts on their homes. Homeowners who were hoping for lower payments are discovering to their dismay that lenders roll late fees, back taxes or other costs into the principal, sometimes turning a difficult payment into an impossible one. That is one reason that many reworked mortgages are sliding back into default.

It's too early to know if this pattern will continue under the Obama administration's $75 billion initiative to get lenders to reduce monthly payments for homeowners struggling to make their mortgages. A total of 360,165 mortgage modifications are now in a three-month trial period under the government's plan announced in March. But the initiative focuses on reducing interest rates rather than cutting principal, which has been found to be one of the most effective modifications for helping homeowners avoid defaulting a second time (known as a "re-default").

Of loans modified from Jan. 1, 2008, through March 31, 2009, monthly payments increased on 27% and were left unchanged on an additional 27.5%, according to a recent report by banking regulators. Many modified mortgages fall delinquent — 25% to 40%, depending on the type of mortgage — often because of homeowners' loss of income or additional outstanding debt, according to a report last month by CreditSights, a financial research firm.

"Payments have gone up …. (and) the payment relief can last for the first few years and then go up (again)," says Alan White, assistant professor of law at the Valparaiso University School of Law in Valparaiso, Ind. He has studied the subprime mortgage situation for 10 years. "(The lenders) focus on today and not on the future." Even under the Obama plan, they don't focus on permanent debt reduction, White says.

The majority of borrowers who've gotten mortgage modifications have seen their overall principal balance go up, according to an analysis by CreditSights and ICP of about 660,000 mortgages modified this year. In about 90% of the modifications, the principal balance after a modification was larger, CreditSights said.

Hit with a 1-2 punch

That's the situation facing Samantha and Steve Jensen. When the couple bought their $550,000 home in Scottsdale, Ariz., six years ago, they thought they'd found the perfect place to raise their three children.

But when their adjustable-rate mortgage reset to a higher rate, they could no longer afford the monthly payments that jumped by about $1,000 a month, to $3,300. So they were relieved when their bank in June offered to modify their mortgage by lowering their interest rate.

Under the modification they were to pay $2,600 a month — but then they discovered they also had unpaid property taxes. Once the bank added taxes to their principal, they say, their monthly mortgage payment grew to $3,500. They got a modification in June and are now two months behind on their mortgage payments and facing possible foreclosure.

"The bank could have done more and reduced our principal," says Samantha, 40, a special education teacher. "You have the anticipation of relief and then you realize it's not going to make it better. It's like being punched in the stomach twice."

How most modifications work

A mortgage modification can take several forms. Lenders may allow borrowers to skip payments and then add the skipped payments to the amount of the loan. They may reduce the interest rate charged, extend the loan term, or reduce the total amount of the loan by forgiving principal.

Many lenders say that reducing principal remains the modification of last resort.

More than 80% of loan modifications that Wells Fargo has done in the past three months have led to lower payments for borrowers, but most involve rate reductions, the bank says. Wells Fargo has done more than 240,000 modifications, and more than 30,000 of those have been under the Obama administration program.

At CitiMortgage, about 92% of modifications involve reducing rates, lengthening terms of the loan, or both. About 8% provide principal reduction.

Providing relief to borrowers is complicated because of the financial interests of the parties on the other side of the loan. Many mortgages are commonly sold to investors, and borrowers' payments are collected by servicers, which may be the original lender or a different company.

Certain types of loans cannot be modified without the investors' approval. Lenders and investors may shy away from reducing a mortgage's principal balance because that requires them to write down the value of the loan. But temporarily reducing interest payments while adding to the mortgage's principal avoids any loss.

Some research suggests lenders may gain financially if they don't modify a mortgage at all.

According to a paper published this year by the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, more than 30% of delinquent borrowers fix their situation on their own and are able to pay even if no action is taken.

Another reason lenders might resist modifications is the combined impact of high re-default rates and falling property values in many markets. A lender might calculate that helping a borrower avert foreclosure now only risks a deeper loss if the house goes to foreclosure anyway a year later.

And some lenders say even if they modify loans, so many homeowners are underwater — meaning their homes are worth less than their mortgages — that some borrowers are defaulting on purpose, "walking away" after the lender has spent money and time renegotiating the loan.

"We have customers who can afford the payments but are underwater. They default not because they have to, but because it's better for them," says Jack Shackett, Bank of America's head of credit-loss prevention. "They can act like they want the modification and then they still default, so they've stayed for three to four months in the house for free."

The Obama administration's plan tries to overcome some of these barriers by imposing a three-month trial period during which borrowers must pay the renegotiated mortgage, discouraging them from walking away.

Also, the emphasis under the Obama administration plan is on getting lower monthly payments for homeowners.

Servicers must follow an established process to reduce the monthly payment to no more than 31% of the borrowers' gross monthly income. To do that, lenders will first reduce the interest rate on the loan and then extend the original term of the loan to up to 40 years.

"In the past, modification increased the burdens on borrowers. Under the president's plan, it reduces payments to a meaningful level," says Michael Barr, assistant secretary for financial institutions at Treasury. "Investors and servicers get incentives and are paid only if loans succeed."

Under the program, mortgage holders and investors receive a one-time government payment of $1,500 for each modification agreement completed with borrowers who are current when they begin the program.

Short-term vs. long-term help

Mounting unemployment and loss of income threaten to complicate efforts to prevent foreclosures, even for mortgages that are substantially modified. That's why some banks and economists are pushing for short-term personal loans to the jobless, or a break for several months in making payments.

A recent Federal Reserve Bank of Boston study suggests that to reduce foreclosures, the government should shift its focus from providing mortgage help to directing more financial assistance to those who lose their jobs. The authors say one strategy might be giving loans or grants to individual homeowners for a year or two to help them through difficult periods so they don't lose their homes.

Some lenders are already trying similar tactics on their own. Bank of America is occasionally offering temporary mortgage forgiveness for three to six months in hopes the borrower will find a new job in that time. It is pushing the government to initiate such a program nationwide.

"Our view all along is that that will be a very effective way to address the problem," says Paul Willen, one author on the Federal Reserve study. "A lot of what's being done is a misplaced focus on modest, long-term relief when what they need is fast, short-term, massive relief (due to job loss)."

One such homeowner is Carol Cole, 71, who received a modification in February that cut her payments from more than $3,000 a month to $2,500. That's still $500 more a month than she was paying when she bought her $575,000 house in Santa Rosa Beach, Fla., about five years ago.

With income from her spa business falling, she's worried she'll become delinquent on her mortgage as soon as this winter. Cole has applied for another modification, but she says her bank has told her she has to wait 12 months to qualify for help. Her lender, Bank of America, said it had to deny her request for a further modification because the investor who holds her mortgage does not participate in the government's modification program. However the bank is continuing to pursue the case.

"It's a terrible challenge (making the payments) and I'm trying not to fall behind, but it's going to get to the point I can't make it," Cole says. "This affects your health, your relationships. You don't eat or sleep."

California Hotel Foreclosures Triple in Travel Slump

Hotel foreclosures in California more than tripled in the first nine months of this year as business travelers and vacationers cut spending.

With a decrease in personal and business travel comes an influx of commercial foreclosures that involve hotels. While the article focuses on the California market, other markets that include Florida are starting to see the same trend. Markets such as LA and San Diego have an oversupply of hotel rooms which drives occupancy rates down. When occupancy goes down, revenue goes down. When revenue goes down, mortgage/interest payments aren’t met. When banks don’t get paid they foreclose. As you may remember we also will look at distressed commercial property to purchase. Call me with any questions.

California Hotel Foreclosures Triple in Travel Slump

Hotel foreclosures in California more than tripled in the first nine months of this year as business travelers and vacationers cut spending.

Foreclosures including the 400-room St. Regis Monarch Beach resort in Dana Point climbed to 47 in January through September from 15 a year earlier. Properties in default more than quadrupled to 259, Irvine, California-based Atlas Hospitality Group said in a statement. Atlas specializes in selling hotels. The survey didn’t include states other than California.

Declining occupancy rates and a dearth of credit for refinancing loans obtained during the U.S. real estate boom are squeezing the travel industry. Loans secured by more than 1,500 hotels with a total outstanding balance of $24.5 billion may be in danger of default, according to Realpoint LLC, a credit rating company that tracks the performance of securities tied to mortgages on commercial property.

“Urban areas are dependent on a mix of business, convention and leisure travel,” said Robert Mandelbaum, research director for PKF Hospitality Research in Atlanta. “There’s been a tremendous decline in business and convention travel.”

Lodging owners are struggling after adding rooms and properties from 2004 to 2007, when financing was easy to come by because banks could bundle loans into commercial mortgage-backed securities and sell them on to investors. About $83.4 billion in hotel-backed securities were issued in those years, according to Realpoint.

Trouble in L.A.

“We see higher default numbers in L.A. County and San Diego County because of the sheer volume of hotels,” Alan Reay, president of Atlas Hospitality, said in a telephone interview. “A lot of new product has been added in those counties.”

More than 70 percent of troubled California hotel loans originated between 2005 and 2007, Reay said. Nearly 2,500 of the state’s hotels were financed or refinanced during those years, accounting for about 25 percent of the entire supply, he said.

Occupancy in the top 25 U.S. travel markets fell to 61 percent in the first eight months of the year from 69 percent a year earlier, according to Smith Travel Research in Hendersonville, Tennessee.

Riverside, California, outside of Los Angeles, had nine hotels in foreclosure through September. San Bernardino was home to six and Los Angeles had five, Atlas said.

Another 28 Los Angeles hotels were in default, according to Atlas. Occupancy there dropped to 65 percent in January through August from 75 percent a year earlier, according to Smith Travel.

“Los Angeles is a gateway city,” Mandelbaum said in a telephone interview. “Prior to 2009, we were enjoying the influx from foreign travelers. That also has tapered off due to this global economic decline.”

San Diego had 26 hotels in default and San Bernardino had 23, Atlas said.

Banks' delays threaten $8,000 tax credit for many home buyers

The article focuses on the presumed expiration of the $8000 tax credit for first time home buyers, it also discusses a fact that I was unaware of. The State of Florida has a program ( Florida Home Buyer Opportunity Program ) that will advance the $8000 credit to the eligible home buyers for use at closing. For those of you in other states, your local realtor board and mortgage companies should have details on similar programs that may exist in your state.

While the article is negative in nature (I know your shocked that the press takes a negative approach to everything!), this tidbit of information may help buyers that you are working with. Many people thought that they had to wait to secure the $8000 until after their 2009 tax return was filed.

Even though the writer comments that an extension to the program is unlikely, he also points out that, “The credit was meant to spur home purchases in 2009, and premature talk of extending the giveaway into 2010 might encourage home buyers to postpone purchases.” So write your Congressional Representative and ask them to extend the credit!

Banks' delays threaten $8,000 tax credit for many home buyers

About 130 of broker Craig Beggins' 189 pending home sales contracts are short sales. • They are the type of transaction that closes only if lenders waive part of the unpaid mortgage balance, a process that can take months for some banks to approve. • But a huge segment of the local home buying market can't wait that long. They are eager to tap the government's $8,000 First-Time Home Buyer tax credit, which expires at the end of November. • "A lot of the short-sale buyers are first time home buyers. Now they're in a time crunch," said Beggins of Century 21 Beggins Enterprises in Apollo Beach. "The chance of 130 of our short sales closing by Nov. 30 is nonexistent." • That's what happens when two parts of the home buying machine fail to work in synch. With anywhere from one-third to one-half of Tampa Bay home sales going the short-sale route, accessing the $8,000 tax credit can be problematic. • To be sure, the tax credit wins nothing but praise from Realtors, house hunters and home builders. The credit is for first-time home buyers, defined as those who haven't bought a home for at least three years. It was included in the federal stimulus program passed in February and applies to homes bought from Jan. 1 through Nov. 30. • Unlike last year's $7,500 home buyer tax credit, this year's giveaway doesn't have to be repaid as long as you keep the home as your primary residence for three years.

Even if you owe no taxes in 2009, the government will send you a check.

An estimated 1.4 million home buyers across the country, including 106,000 in Florida, have claimed the credit already. But with the deadline less than two months away — and little indication so far that Congress will extend the freebie — real estate agents and home builders are warning buyers away from shilly-shallying with the bank.

"I don't do short sales and foreclosures. The lending institutions are too difficult to work with," Tampa Realtor Sue Paskert said. "It takes forever to get it done. I've tried to encourage buyers to stay away from them and find motivated sellers."

That's the advice home buyer Sheray Sharby took. When the single mother of a young son started her house hunt earlier this year, looking to claim the $8,000, the Air Force master sergeant bid on two Hillsborough properties. One was bank-owned. The other was a short sale. In both cases, the sales wouldn't close without bank consent.

Spurned on both deals, Sharby found a nonforeclosure home in Gibsonton's Kings Lake neighborhood, giving the seller 12 hours to accept or reject her $136,900 offer. The seller accepted.

"Now I've got a place for my little guy and myself. I was tired of living in apartments," she said. "The tax credit is a good idea. Something's got to be done. Sales have picked up. I notice a lot of houses I was looking at have been sold."

Home builders face similar time crunches if they want customers to tap the government dough. David Pelletz, regional president with Standard Pacific Homes, has marketed unsold, completed homes in places like the Asbel Creek and Country Walk communities in central Pasco County.

Waiting the typical four months to build your home from scratch just won't work if the tax credit's an issue.

Lennar, another major player in Tampa home building circles, launched a Web site to promote the government giveaway under the slogan "8,000 reasons why now is the time to buy."

"Through the summer, we definitely had a rush of people. We estimated it's created about 30 percent of sales," Pelletz said of the credit. "If the house isn't started already, it isn't going to make it to the deadline."

Some states, including Florida, have sweetened the deal even further.

They created a cash advance program so home buyers could use the credit for their down payment instead of waiting to collect next year after filing 2009 taxes.

In early August, the state released $30 million toward the Florida Home Buyer Opportunity Program. Pinellas, Hillsborough, Pasco and Hernando counties share $2.7 million of that money, enough to finance 335 home purchases at $8,000 apiece.

"People don't always have money at the closing," said Hills borough Realtor Lisa Mann. "Some people just need the extra help to get in. Most of them are paying more rent than it costs to get a house. It's the down payment and closing money that prevents some buyers from owning."

Pinellas Realtor Tom Loulakis is a big proponent of the tax credit, but is pulling his hair out over bank inaction on short sales. The National Association of Realtors is lobbying for an expansion and extension of the credit, arguing that Nov. 30 is too soon to call it off.

"They're ringing my phone off the hook: 'Can you get this closed before the credit closes?' '' Loulakis said. "Unfortunately, the banks are unreliable on short sales. Some take seven weeks. Some take seven months."

Extension seems unlikely.

Home builders and Realtor trade groups have bombarded Congress with requests to extend the tax credit, but legislators, already reeling from accusations of budgetary extravagance, have yet to commit. Realtors even suggest expanding the credit to $15,000, which critics argue is a blatant special interest handout. Congress' silence has a purpose: The credit was meant to spur home purchases in 2009, and premature talk of extending the giveaway into 2010 might encourage home buyers to postpone purchases.

U.S. Treasury set to finalize home "short sales" plan

Finally some good news from the Government! It appears that they are in the process of finalizing plans for additional incentives to mortgage companies to approve short sales. The amount of time some lenders/servicing companies are taking to approve short sales borders on crazy! Hopefully additional incentive will assist in getting more approved. A quote from the article states "Presumably, the Treasury is trying to help facilitate a transaction that will result in less loss to the lender than in the case of a foreclosure," John Burns consultants said in a research note dated Oct 1 alerting clients of an impending Treasury announcement.

U.S. Treasury set to finalize home "short sales" plan

The U.S. Treasury will soon finalize a plan to expand its incentives for mortgage companies to include "short sales" as a way to stem a rising tide of foreclosures, according to a Treasury spokeswoman.

"Short sales," or sales of homes for less than the balance on existing mortgages, are seen as a key way to supplement other efforts such as loan modifications to steady housing. Unlike most modifications, "short sales" eliminate the problem of negative equity that has become a big reason for defaults as home prices have plunged.

The incentives, first announced in May, would expand the government's Home Affordable Modification Program that has seen limited success in lowering payments for hundreds of thousands of homeowners deemed eligible. Just 12 percent of homeowners eligible have had their loans reworked, leaving millions more foreclosures to come, the Treasury said on September 9.

More short sales may alleviate fears that a raft of "shadow supply," or foreclosures in the pipeline, will flood the market and deal a blow to the nascent rebound in housing seen over the U.S. summer months, analysts said. The overhang of supply is currently about 7 million units, or 135 percent of a year's of existing home sales, according to Amherst Securities Group.

"What they are trying to do is move some of these foreclosures in the pipeline, and bring them to a resolution before (foreclosure) happens," said Lisa Marquis Jackson, a vice president at Irvine, California-based John Burns Real Estate Consulting. "12 percent of these being modified isn't enough to clean these up."

Realtors express frustrations with banks when trying to negotiate a short sale, which can take four to five months to complete, according to John Burns consultants. Buyers often walk away from sales because banks are slow to respond, or balk at the offer.

The Treasury will use up to $10 billion from a previously announced $50 billion pool of mortgage modification funds for payments to address lender concerns that home prices will continue falling in high-cost areas.

Incentives will be calculated on recent declines of local home prices and average home prices in these markets, the Treasury said in May. They would add to other incentives that servicers can receive for reducing loan payments.

In May, the Treasury proposed lenders would receive a $1,000 payment for allowing the owner to sell the house for less than the amount owed on the mortgage, and accepting the proceeds as full repayment. They can also receive $1,000 for accepting a similar deed-in-lieu transaction, in which the deed is simply transferred to the lender instead of going through a costly foreclosure.

Borrowers who agree to short sales or deed-in-lieu deals can received up to $1,500 in closing costs. Treasury also said it will pay second lien holders up to $1,000 to relinquish their claims in such transactions.

"Presumably, the Treasury is trying to help facilitate a transaction that will result in less loss to the lender than in the case of a foreclosure," John Burns consultants said in a research note dated Oct 1 alerting clients of an impending Treasury announcement.

Second foreclosure wave likely to hit commercial property

If I have said it once I have said it many times......take out the long board because the commercial short sale wave is coming! In my “travels” I am starting to hear that the “commercial lenders are becoming more reasonable when evaluating short sale offers.” What this means is that short sales (whether residential or commercial) are going to be with us for a long time. Let me know if you have any owners of over leveraged commercial properties.

Second foreclosure wave likely to hit commercial property

DALLAS - The economy and the real estate market are slowly bouncing back. But experts fear that a second wave of foreclosures is rolling in and this time, commercial real estate is the target. Broken fences, graffiti and trash litter a vacant lot near Central Expressway and Walnut Hill Lane in Dallas. Forty two acres of rocky landscape, it was meant to be the foundation for a redevelopment vision filled with apartments, retail stores and restaurants.

But the vision crumbled. "It's kind of an eyesore. I just would like them to do something, make some progress," said neighbor Charles McFarland. The multi-million dollar project is now facing foreclosure and set to go to sale next month. More vacant lots are going to pop up in North Texas and all over the nation.

The commercial real estate market is facing its own crisis, and it's a market worth trillions of dollars. Over on Turtle Creek, a for lease sign stands on a site, where the plan was to build a boutique hotel.

Experts say developers are putting projects on hold or heading into foreclosure because of the economy.

"We are seeing more and more foreclosures. We are seeing circumstances that a person who owns the property can't make their interest payments or loan payments. The banks are working with them, but it's sad to report it's going to be an ugly scene," said SMU professor, Mike Davis.

Tough times are expected until 2011, according to Brad Crumpecker, a Dallas financial analyst.

"Everything right now with the credit markets for commercial real estate is sort of in limbo," he said.

Crumpecker says there's money to lend. It's just harder to come by and more expensive. Lenders are tightening their belts, turning away developers with good credit.

"Even if you have been making your payments and you go to your bank for a refinance on your commercial real estate loan, it may well be that they don't have the capacity to refinance you," he said.

Experts say Texas is standing on better ground, compared to other states, because it didn't over build. However, there's a rocky road ahead.

Generation F: foreclosure may scar kids for years

When reading the national news as it pertains to pre foreclosures and foreclosures, I always see articles on the effect foreclosures have on banks, realtors, businesses, animals, condition of houses etc etc. This article is the first article that really hit home with me. It discusses the effects foreclosures have on a new group of people known as ‘Generation F” or Generation Foreclosure.

Who are these people? They cant control what the banks do or don’t do. They had no input on what documents were signed or not signed. They can’t help when it comes to job loss. They have very little input as to how the family unit is run. Have you figured out who I am speaking about yet? Generation F is made up of all of the kids that are affected by foreclosures. I have (4) children myself that range in age from 2 years old to 12 years old. I can’t imagine the effect a foreclosure would have on them.

The facts are that more than 2500 kids per DAY are displaced as a result of a house that they are living in being foreclosed on by a lien holder. Many of these kids are displaced suddenly (at least to them) because there parents either failed to plan for another place to live after there house was foreclosed or just had no other place to go. Kids are ejected from their homes to live in far reaching places. What did they do to deserve this travesty? Nothing!

You may think that I am stating the obvious. Maybe so. What you should be asking is what you can do about this growing problem. Allot of it revolves around awareness. Be aware of what you can do to either eliminate the impact or lessen it. When working with folks that are in foreclosure, that have kids make sure that their eyes are wide open. Push them to plan (EARLY in the process) where they are going to move their family.

Many people are in denial and feel that the time will never come when they have to leave their home. Hopefully the time wont come meaning (the ultimate goal is to keep these families in their homes). If they can’t stay in their homes, make sure an attorney is looking after their best interest AND NO ONE ELSE'S! Make sure that they have a plan in place to move their family in a seamless manner. Most importantly, do your best to make sure they are considering the well being of the children.

Generation F: foreclosure may scar kids for years

We used to worry about latch-key kids.

Now, with banks changing locks on 3,000 homes per day, families can feel fortunate if their kids still have a key that fits the front door.

We’ve heard about all we can handle about what the foreclosure crisis is doing to car sales, home values, the Dow Industrials and unemployment claims. But, experts and policy wonks are just beginning to fathom what being locked out will mean for its youngest and most vulnerable victims: our kids.

Dub them Generation F, for foreclosure. For them, the boogie man has morphed into the repo man.

“Experts tell us the lingering effects of foreclosure on the kids impacted by it and on our communities will remain for years after the economy goes from bust back to boom,” writes Chicago Parent Magazine Editor Tamara O’Shaughnessy, in a forward to this month’s cover story, a six-part investigative series “Locked Out.”

“That means the suffering of our children is only beginning.”

With the national average at .82 children per family, the ranks of Generation F swell by about 2,500 every day. There were 360,000 more of them in July, according RealtyTrac. By the time the recession winds down in 2010, people who earn a living studying child homelessness like Ellen Bassuk say upwards of 8 million kids will have been shown the door to their own homes.

“Children without homes are on the frontline of the nation’s economic crisis. These numbers will grow as home foreclosures continue to rise,” said Bassuk, president of the National Center on Family Homelessness and Associate Professor of Psychiatry at Harvard Medical School.

Generation F
People who study kids and homelessness have a handle on how many kids don’t have a roof over their heads. But, they can’t yet tell how many of them wound up that way because their home was repossessed.

A 2009 Foundation for Child and Youth Well-Being predicts young people will suffer a hodgepodge of hitches from the bubble that burst this decade. Millions more kids will be living in poverty, losing health insurance, witnessing the domestic violence that comes with a family financial crisis and facing burgeoning crime spawning in boarded-up blocks.

At the same time, they’ll be switching schools, living in overcrowded households, and relying on public support systems weakened by anemic tax rolls, says Malcolm Bush, a researcher in low and middle-income communities at the University of Chicago.

In March, UC brought experts from around the country for a groundbreaking forum, “Children and Foreclosures: The Economic Crisis Hits Home.” As families vacate houses and property values dwindle in blocks around them, Bush says, the city coffers collect less tax money and have less to spend on violence prevention, youth programs and schools.

“These cuts have a direct impact on the health, education and protection, that immediately impacts kids,” he said.

Don’t take my kodachrome away

While the field of Generation F still is far from exact science, policy pros have enough facts to get the picture that losing a home isn’t the stuff of Kodak moments.

In fact, the repo man literally confiscated the kodachrome of Dawn and Audrey Tonkinson, two areas Chicago tweens. On the day the eviction company left its wordless memo to the Tonkinsons that time in their sprawling suburban home was up, it hauled away boxes of school art projects and CD’s loaded with pictures of dance recitals, swim meets, gymnastic competitions.

“That was the thing that was really hard on the girls,” said Stacey Tonkinson a 42-year-old elementary school teacher. “It was like they lost a portion of their memories.”

Tisha Canada still has her children’s stories about having no place to sleep and the drawings of sad stick figures that tipped off teachers that something was wrong after school. But don’t ask her to see them.

“I could never find them in a day,” she said. “They’re buried deep in a rented storage space.”

Canada, of Minneapolis, is among more than half of families displaced by foreclosure who find themselves on the streets because their landlord didn’t pay their mortgage.

She also puts a face on the pattern of doubling up.

New York urban policy expert Ingrid Gould Ellen reports a 35 percent spike in New York families checking into homeless shelters the same day the bank reclaimed their house. But workers at Chicago agencies say they’re not yet feeling the influx because families first go through a process of “doubling up,” a cycle of moving in with relatives, then friends, until problems like conflict, transportation, overcrowding, inevitably surface.

Studies show that stuffing in more than 1.5 people per room fosters disease and family violence, Bush said.

“Overcrowding doesn’t just have immediate health ramifications, but also ramifications of family stress and family violence,” he said.

It’s painless to rationalize that all these parents are getting kicked out of their homes because they busted their budgets and listened when lenders sold them a house of cards. It tougher to swallow a story of parents working hard to support their families, making decisions that worked one year and were doomed the next.

It’s even harder to blame the victim when we see a picture of kids packing their bedrooms into boxes.


Theft of fixtures becomes major risk in foreclosures

Several months ago I posted an article regarding the stripping of fixtures from pre foreclosures. I read this article which focuses on the same subject. The bottom line is that if an item is attached to the house it is considered a fixture. A fixture can’t be removed from a house that is going through pre foreclosure. In many states, if not all, this practice is illegal. The article points out that there have been recent prosecutions involving home owners and realtors removing fixtures from homes during the preforeclosure process. The FBI has been involved with these cases.

A suggestion made in the article involves realtors taking interior pictures of the property on the day that the listing is accepted. The pictures are used to fully document what is in the house at the time of listing. You may consider sending copies of the pictures to the home owner with the added note that fixtures can’t be removed during the listing period.

Theft of fixtures becomes major risk in foreclosures

With a $165,000 price tag, the two-story, four-bedroom house for sale in Avondale was a steal.

Three years ago, when the house was new, a family paid $416,000 for it.

But its soaring living-room ceiling, whirlpool bath, three-car garage and pool with a slide and waterfall weren't enough to make it much more than a handyman's special.

Thieves made off with the home's $30,000 custom-kitchen and other fixtures after it went into foreclosure.

Custom cabinets, appliances, granite countertops and other fixtures just disappeared one day.

"These are fixtures that are supposed to be part of the house. They basically took $30,000 out of the kitchen and left," said John Lincoln, the real-estate agent who recently sold the house to buyers who don't mind fixing it.

Julie Halferty, a special agent who oversees the Phoenix FBI Mortgage Fraud Task Force, said no one knows exactly how many foreclosed houses in the Valley have been stripped by former owners, neighbors or strangers.

Those who work in real estate believe the number is in the thousands.

"Without question, probably 85 to 90 percent of houses on the market under $200,000 have been stripped," said Tempe real-estate agent Kim Baker.

"Appliances are the most commonly poached item, but plumbing fixtures and faucets, ceiling fans, light fixtures, water heaters and air-conditioning units are fair game" in the eyes of the strippers, she said.

Halferty said she and her fellow FBI agents "haven't been able to quantify it, but we know it is rampant."

She said that since metropolitan Phoenix foreclosures are up 600 percent since 2005 - half of the homes sold here this summer were bank-owned - she believes stripping is more common here than anywhere else in the nation.

"These crimes are happening with enough frequency that it has caught the attention of law enforcement, Realtors and lenders across our state," said Tom Farley, executive director of the Arizona Association of Realtors.

"Many Realtors are taking photos of the interior of the home as soon as they take a lender-owned listing to document the condition of the property in case of vandalism," Farley said.

Last week, the Maricopa County Attorney's Office announced five recent prosecutions of accused foreclosure strippers, including one involving a real-estate salesman.

Halferty said the task force hopes the information will educate owners of homes in foreclosure, neighbors and others that it is illegal to help themselves to fixtures and appliances in a vacant home.

"Take a look at Craigslist," Lincoln said. "It's full of things that have been stripped out of houses."

Halferty said Craigslist.org tipped the fraud task force to the extent of the problem.

"It is so blatant," Halferty said. "People would advertise that th